Benjamin Pflugmann writes:
>Hi. Does the error log of the master contain any error?
Nothing at all in the master logs.
>Does the new log position make sense?
Yes, the position is ok, and the slave gets the updates. Its just that
strange error messages about dropped connections and 0-byte pack
Hi.
Does the error log of the master contain any error?
Does the new log position make sense?
It hangs always on the same offset. So it doesn't get forward at
all. That's why I assume some priciple error.
There is some file called master.info in the database directory of the
client. Could you
Benjamin Pflugmann writes:
>Hi. My first guess would be that somehow the slave got out of
>sync. I would try to update the slave by hand and see what happens
>after restart.
>Sorry, I don't see what could be the cause.
I tried the following:
on master:
reset master
on all slaves:
slave sto
Hi.
My first guess would be that somehow the slave got out of sync. I
would try to update the slave by hand and see what happens after
restart.
Sorry, I don't see what could be the cause.
Bye,
Benjamin.
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 06:07:29PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
> I have
>Description:
Hi,
I have 28 linux boxes configured identically, 27 as slaves, one as
master. On all 27 slaves, everything works fine, but only on one I have strange
errors in the logs:
011002 17:49:49 Slave: received 0 length packet from server, apparent master
shutdown: (0)
011002 1
