Re: very strange but reproducable error in 3.23.35

2001-03-20 Thread Sinisa Milivojevic
Tim Bunce writes: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 02:24:52PM +0200, Sinisa Milivojevic wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > I tested your test case and you are right ! > > We've just discovered a very similar sounding problem immediately after > upgrading to 3.23.35. In our case an update is reporting

Re: very strange but reproducable error in 3.23.35

2001-03-20 Thread Tim Bunce
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 02:24:52PM +0200, Sinisa Milivojevic wrote: > > Hi! > > I tested your test case and you are right ! We've just discovered a very similar sounding problem immediately after upgrading to 3.23.35. In our case an update is reporting 0 zero rows updated which then triggers an

Re: very strange but reproducable error in 3.23.35

2001-03-20 Thread Jan Legenhausen
"Gerald L. Clark" wrote: > > This does not answer your problem, but 'timestamp' is a reserved word. > ...not the complete truth ;-) : 7.34 Is MySQL picky about reserved words? A common problem stems from trying to create a table with column names that use the names of datatypes or functions b

Re: very strange but reproducable error in 3.23.35

2001-03-19 Thread Gerald L. Clark
This does not answer your problem, but 'timestamp' is a reserved word. Jan Legenhausen wrote: > > Hi, > > i just upgraded from 3.23.33 to 3.23.35 and found that a little script of > mine which simply modifys a table went mad completly. > I figured out a testcase which shows at least one of the

Re: very strange but reproducable error in 3.23.35

2001-03-19 Thread Sinisa Milivojevic
Hi! I tested your test case and you are right ! Thank you for a reproducible test case. We will fix it shortly. Regards, Sinisa __ _ _ ___ == MySQL AB /*/\*\/\*\ /*/ \*\ /*/ \*\ |*| Sinisa Milivojevic /*/ /*/ /*/ \*\_ |*| |*||*| mail

Re: very strange but reproducable error in 3.23.35

2001-03-18 Thread Sinisa Milivojevic
Jan Legenhausen writes: > > No other messages at all - simply repeating the query _does_ show the > expected. > - no message in the error log (...would have mentioned this... ;-) > - no special thing in the normal log: > 010318 20:41:44 7 Query alter table t_webmaster change lfd

Re: very strange but reproducable error in 3.23.35

2001-03-18 Thread Jan Legenhausen
> > > Hi! > > I have tested your case and it works just fine for me. > > What error message do you get ?? What i wrote was all i got - so there's just > mysql> update t_webmaster set status=1 where type='Open'; > Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.01 sec) No other messages at all - simply repeating

Re: very strange but reproducable error in 3.23.35

2001-03-18 Thread Sinisa Milivojevic
Jan Legenhausen writes: > Hi, > > i just upgraded from 3.23.33 to 3.23.35 and found that a little script of > mine which simply modifys a table went mad completly. > I figured out a testcase which shows at least one of the strange things > which happen: > > Table definition and data: >

very strange but reproducable error in 3.23.35

2001-03-18 Thread Jan Legenhausen
Hi, i just upgraded from 3.23.33 to 3.23.35 and found that a little script of mine which simply modifys a table went mad completly. I figured out a testcase which shows at least one of the strange things which happen: Table definition and data: CREATE TABLE t_webmaster ( lfdnr int(10) unsigne