Re: which solution is better for $count and @cols

2008-10-24 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:31 PM, Fayland Lam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: B one SQLs with some operation SELECT col FROM table WHERE $where while $count is scalar @cols and real cols is splice(@cols, $start, $rows) If you're talking about Perl/DBI, doing that normally loads the entire result set

which solution is better for $count and @cols

2008-10-23 Thread Fayland Lam
well, we have a where $where, and I want some @cols depends on $start, $rows. besides, I want $count too. so we have two solution here. A, two SQLs. 1, SELECT COUNT(*) FROM table WHERE $where 2, SELECT col FROM table WHERE $where LIMIT $start, $rows. B one SQLs with some operation SELECT col

Re: which solution is better for $count and @cols

2008-10-23 Thread D. Dante Lorenso
Fayland Lam wrote: well, we have a where $where, and I want some @cols depends on $start, $rows. besides, I want $count too. so we have two solution here. A, two SQLs. 1, SELECT COUNT(*) FROM table WHERE $where 2, SELECT col FROM table WHERE $where LIMIT $start, $rows. B one SQLs with some

Re: which solution is better for $count and @cols

2008-10-23 Thread Fayland Lam
Thanks very much. D. Dante Lorenso wrote: Fayland Lam wrote: well, we have a where $where, and I want some @cols depends on $start, $rows. besides, I want $count too. so we have two solution here. A, two SQLs. 1, SELECT COUNT(*) FROM table WHERE $where 2, SELECT col FROM table WHERE $where