On 8/23/06, Gregor Reich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
Is there a possibility to have some tables write-protected while others
in the same db are not (and yet the write-protected ones are updatable
through the replication mechanism, ie. there are tables on a slave
server). I guess that both,
Vielen Dank für die Hinweise; grant ... wird mir weiterhelfen.
Gruss, Gregor.
Dominik Klein schrieb:
Guten Morgen Gregor
beim nächsten mal antworte bitte an die Liste.
Beispiel:
User gregor soll auf datenbank.tabelle1 nur lesend zugreifen können,
auf datenbank.tabelle2 auch schreibend.
Hi all
Is there a possibility to have some tables write-protected while others
in the same db are not (and yet the write-protected ones are updatable
through the replication mechanism, ie. there are tables on a slave
server). I guess that both, LOCK TABLES and read-only in my.cnf, don't
get
Is there a possibility to have some tables write-protected while others
in the same db are not (and yet the write-protected ones are updatable
through the replication mechanism, ie. there are tables on a slave
server). I guess that both, LOCK TABLES and read-only in my.cnf, don't
get this