Re: [mythtv] [PATCH] amd64 (-march=k8) frontend crash with ivtv

2005-03-22 Thread Isaac Richards
On Friday 04 March 2005 09:54 am, tommy wrote: > Just a little curious as to why this patch hasn't been applied yet? Is > there something wrong with it? > I have a feeling with the automagic settings.pro in cvs automatically > building for k8 processors this will come up as a problem in the near >

Re: [mythtv] [PATCH] amd64 (-march=k8) frontend crash with ivtv

2005-03-04 Thread tommy
tommy wrote: Isaac Richards wrote: On Tuesday 28 December 2004 01:37 am, tommy wrote: The pointer manipulation in the two lines of code are incorrect for k8 processors, they were causing the frontend to segfault on playback. This hasn't been tested on a 32 bit processor, so if someone could make su

Re: [mythtv] [PATCH] amd64 (-march=k8) frontend crash with ivtv

2005-02-08 Thread tommy
Isaac Richards wrote: On Tuesday 28 December 2004 01:37 am, tommy wrote: The pointer manipulation in the two lines of code are incorrect for k8 processors, they were causing the frontend to segfault on playback. This hasn't been tested on a 32 bit processor, so if someone could make sure it comp

Re: [mythtv] [PATCH] amd64 (-march=k8) frontend crash with ivtv

2004-12-29 Thread Isaac Richards
On Tuesday 28 December 2004 01:37 am, tommy wrote: > The pointer manipulation in the two lines of code are incorrect for k8 > processors, they were causing the frontend to segfault on playback. > This hasn't been tested on a 32 bit processor, so if someone could make > sure it compiles without warn

[mythtv] [PATCH] amd64 (-march=k8) frontend crash with ivtv

2004-12-27 Thread tommy
The pointer manipulation in the two lines of code are incorrect for k8 processors, they were causing the frontend to segfault on playback. This hasn't been tested on a 32 bit processor, so if someone could make sure it compiles without warnings and works that would be great. Cheers, Tom. Index