On Friday 04 March 2005 09:54 am, tommy wrote:
> Just a little curious as to why this patch hasn't been applied yet? Is
> there something wrong with it?
> I have a feeling with the automagic settings.pro in cvs automatically
> building for k8 processors this will come up as a problem in the near
>
tommy wrote:
Isaac Richards wrote:
On Tuesday 28 December 2004 01:37 am, tommy wrote:
The pointer manipulation in the two lines of code are incorrect for k8
processors, they were causing the frontend to segfault on playback.
This hasn't been tested on a 32 bit processor, so if someone could make
su
Isaac Richards wrote:
On Tuesday 28 December 2004 01:37 am, tommy wrote:
The pointer manipulation in the two lines of code are incorrect for k8
processors, they were causing the frontend to segfault on playback.
This hasn't been tested on a 32 bit processor, so if someone could make
sure it comp
On Tuesday 28 December 2004 01:37 am, tommy wrote:
> The pointer manipulation in the two lines of code are incorrect for k8
> processors, they were causing the frontend to segfault on playback.
> This hasn't been tested on a 32 bit processor, so if someone could make
> sure it compiles without warn
The pointer manipulation in the two lines of code are incorrect for k8
processors, they were causing the frontend to segfault on playback.
This hasn't been tested on a 32 bit processor, so if someone could make
sure it compiles without warnings and works that would be great.
Cheers,
Tom.
Index
