> On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 02:15:53AM -0400, Chris Pinkham wrote:
> > Can you take a look at the attached patch and see if it looks like
> Your patch works for me (I tested it on a garbage 5-minute "find-once"
> recording this morning).
Thanks. I should have been in bed last night hours before I
On Tuesday 21 June 2005 10:13, Robert Tsai wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 02:15:53AM -0400, Chris Pinkham wrote:
> > Can you take a look at the attached patch and see if it looks like
> > it accomplishes the same thing you were going for. I have had a
> > couple complaints about the same bug wit
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 02:15:53AM -0400, Chris Pinkham wrote:
> Can you take a look at the attached patch and see if it looks like
> it accomplishes the same thing you were going for. I have had a
> couple complaints about the same bug with commercial flagging and
> hadn't had a chance to investi
On Monday 20 June 2005 23:22, Robert Tsai wrote:
> I could have sworn this was working way back when I initially
> submitted it (I remember this "find once" case giving me problems back
> then). It's possible that things were subtly busted between the time
> of initial submission and eventual commi
> I could have sworn this was working way back when I initially
> submitted it (I remember this "find once" case giving me problems back
> then). It's possible that things were subtly busted between the time
> of initial submission and eventual commit (lots of things were
> changing).
Can you take
I could have sworn this was working way back when I initially
submitted it (I remember this "find once" case giving me problems back
then). It's possible that things were subtly busted between the time
of initial submission and eventual commit (lots of things were
changing).
The bug is that "find
