Re: [mythtv] [PATCH] revised/added protocol extension patch -- ignore last one

2005-05-03 Thread Ed W
Right. There's some benefit to that, I'm just not sure if it's worth the extra time those queries would then take, especially if the frontend were made to use 'em. Although, one _could_ also argue that other projects should just use libmyth/libmythtv instead of reimplementing things from scra

Re: [mythtv] [PATCH] revised/added protocol extension patch -- ignore last one

2005-05-02 Thread Isaac Richards
On Sunday 01 May 2005 10:05 pm, Kevin Kuphal wrote: > Isaac Richards wrote: > >My questions as well, every time this is brought up. libmysqlclient's > > just a cross-compile away for almost any platform. It's tiny, too - if a > > platform's that starved for RAM, it's not going to be capable of >

Re: [mythtv] [PATCH] revised/added protocol extension patch -- ignore last one

2005-05-01 Thread Geoff O'Callaghan
Isaac Richards wrote: On Sunday 01 May 2005 03:32 pm, Brad Templeton wrote: On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 01:45:01PM -0400, Noone wrote: It is a step in the right direction imho. Since the end result would also be the backend caches much of the commonly requested data (recorded list, guide data, ICONS,

Re: [mythtv] [PATCH] revised/added protocol extension patch -- ignore last one

2005-05-01 Thread Kevin Kuphal
Isaac Richards wrote: My questions as well, every time this is brought up. libmysqlclient's just a cross-compile away for almost any platform. It's tiny, too - if a platform's that starved for RAM, it's not going to be capable of displaying much of a UI, either. Just out of curiosity, do yo

Re: [mythtv] [PATCH] revised/added protocol extension patch -- ignore last one

2005-05-01 Thread Isaac Richards
On Sunday 01 May 2005 03:32 pm, Brad Templeton wrote: > On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 01:45:01PM -0400, Noone wrote: > > It is a step in the right direction imho. Since the end result would > > also be the backend caches much of the commonly requested data (recorded > > list, guide data, ICONS, etc.), t

Re: [mythtv] [PATCH] revised/added protocol extension patch -- ignore last one

2005-05-01 Thread Brad Templeton
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 01:45:01PM -0400, Noone wrote: > It is a step in the right direction imho. Since the end result would also be > the backend caches much of the commonly requested data (recorded list, guide > data, ICONS, etc.), the hit shouldn't be that bad. I don't know about the inside

Re: [mythtv] [PATCH] revised/added protocol extension patch -- ignore last one

2005-05-01 Thread Noone
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 03:32:31AM -0400, Isaac Richards wrote: > On Sunday 01 May 2005 02:58 am, Noone wrote: > > > > If it matters much, I think what you're doing is exactly what myth needs. > > Something I noticed awhile ago is myth's reliance (and blocking) on sql > > queries. It looks fine o

Re: [mythtv] [PATCH] revised/added protocol extension patch -- ignore last one

2005-05-01 Thread J. Donavan Stanley
Noone wrote: >The guide definetly needs help. I count about 11 queries just by changing >focus (alt-tab away and back to myth): > >- SELECT NULL (these btw POUND the sql server in mini storms for some reason >.. I haven't dug much into what the hell causes it or why they are needed) >- Time for

Re: [mythtv] [PATCH] revised/added protocol extension patch -- ignore last one

2005-05-01 Thread Isaac Richards
On Sunday 01 May 2005 02:58 am, Noone wrote: > On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 12:53:35AM -0400, David Shay wrote: > > OK, I've decided to go ahead and complete the protocol extensions that I > > would > > If it matters much, I think what you're doing is exactly what myth needs. > Something I noticed awhi

Re: [mythtv] [PATCH] revised/added protocol extension patch -- ignore last one

2005-04-30 Thread Noone
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 12:53:35AM -0400, David Shay wrote: > OK, I've decided to go ahead and complete the protocol extensions that I would If it matters much, I think what you're doing is exactly what myth needs. Something I noticed awhile ago is myth's reliance (and blocking) on sql queries.

Re: [mythtv] [PATCH] revised/added protocol extension patch -- ignore last one

2005-04-30 Thread David Whyte
On 5/1/05, David Shay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Comments,thoughts before I proceed?  Next steps would be to add functions toget guide data, in order to emulate the front-end guide, then add a function to schedule a recording.  Scheduling the recording is a pretty vital one.  Ifwe can make that a p

[mythtv] [PATCH] revised/added protocol extension patch -- ignore last one

2005-04-30 Thread David Shay
OK, I've decided to go ahead and complete the protocol extensions that I would need for most playback functions from alternate frontends. Here are the additional commands and how they work: QUERY_SQL [query statement] Returns all rows and columns of the resultset in []:[] delimited form QUE