No 0.2 had a compatibility interface to support 0.1.9.
So the new driver is backwards compatible.
0.1.9 is not forwards compatible which is the dependency you have added.
As for a bug in the driver, I believe it is considered to be Alpha and
therefore subject to change.
John
>
> If any ioctl i
On Friday 04 February 2005 12:34 pm, David Engel wrote:
> If any ioctl interfces actually changed (as opposed to new one's being
> added), it's a bug in the driver. I don't know of any such cases. If
> they had, using Myth compiled for 0.1.9 would have broken when using a
> 0.2.0 driver.
There _
