On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 09:29:36PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Er, care to be a bit more specific? I'm guessing you're saying that
> there's something wrong with free-java-sdk, but it's pretty unhelpful
> to have no idea why you say that. Is it only that ProjectX is known
> not to compile t
> Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 13:27:35 -0500
> From: "Michael T. Dean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 01/20/06 04:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Well, I just had a total bombout on both ideas. I'm running Unbuntu
> >Breezy, in case anyone has any suggestions. What follows are sketchy
On 01/20/06 04:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Well, I just had a total bombout on both ideas. I'm running Unbuntu
>Breezy, in case anyone has any suggestions. What follows are sketchy
>summaries; if someone wants more details to help debug, I can include
>precise versions and transcripts from my
> Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 21:40:17 +
> From: Nick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 19/01/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Still looking for suggestions on easy ways to either reencode what
> > I've already got at slightly lower rates, or to cut it in ways that
> Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 21:40:17 +
> From: Nick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 19/01/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Still looking for suggestions on easy ways to either reencode what
> > I've already got at slightly lower rates, or to cut it in ways that
On 19/01/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Still looking for suggestions on easy ways to either reencode what
> I've already got at slightly lower rates, or to cut it in ways that
> will not be too difficult..
For cutting that works, I always recommend ProjectX, a Java app.
Howeve
> Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 08:50:46 -0500
> From: Boleslaw Ciesielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> AFAIK, audio has it's own bitrate and it's not counted as part of the
> video bitrate.
Aha! So "bitrate" in the UI is "video bitrate" and not "overall bitrate".
Still looking for suggestio
On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 08:50 -0500, Boleslaw Ciesielski wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I'm using PVR-250's/350's, w/bitrate of 4500 and max bitrate of 6000
> > (e.g., the defaults). I typically record 64 minutes per 1h show
> > (e.g., I pre- and post-roll by 2m). The resulting files are all
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm using PVR-250's/350's, w/bitrate of 4500 and max bitrate of 6000
> (e.g., the defaults). I typically record 64 minutes per 1h show
> (e.g., I pre- and post-roll by 2m). The resulting files are all
> within 1% of 2,500,000,000 bytes (written this way so you know I
>
I've just noticed that the claimed bitrates for MPEG-2 encoding seem
at least 10% lower than what's actually being written. [And there's
question about how to reencode these way at the bottom of this...]
I don't see discussion about this in the archives anywhere.
I'm using PVR-250's/350's, w/bitr
10 matches
Mail list logo
