riginal Message -
From: "Kirk Grell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2005 3:40 AM
Subject: Re: [mythtv-users] Building first MythTV back end box...
> You guys are awesome!! Thanks for helping me with
> this.
>
> I'll definitely go with the 150 (p
On 12/16/05, Kirk Grell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You guys are awesome!! Thanks for helping me with
> this.
>
> I'll definitely go with the 150 (probably the MCE
> version).
Here is a comparison shot someone did of a
250 and a 150. You can see what I mean when I said the
150 was softer.
http
On 12/16/05, Kirk Grell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You guys are awesome!! Thanks for helping me with
> this.
>
> I'll definitely go with the 150 (probably the MCE
> version). Smaller board, less heat, cheaper, easier
> to setup, yet good quality. And It didn't even dawn
> on me that I'd be usi
You guys are awesome!! Thanks for helping me with
this.
I'll definitely go with the 150 (probably the MCE
version). Smaller board, less heat, cheaper, easier
to setup, yet good quality. And It didn't even dawn
on me that I'd be using the S-Video input on the card
instead of the tuner. Duh. :)
On 12/16/05, Kirk Grell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I could bump down to PVR-150. Main thing is that I
> really want as high quality of video as I can get
> before transcoding. In terms of MPEG2, does output
> from the PVR-150 look as good as output from the
> PVR-350?
I have one of each.
I t
On 12/16/05, Michael Bochynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 11:30 -0500, George Nassas wrote:
> On 16-Dec-05, at 11:08 AM, Kirk Grell wrote:
>
> > I could bump down to PVR-150. Main thing is that I
> > really want as high quality of video as I can get
> > before transcoding.
On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 11:30 -0500, George Nassas wrote:
On 16-Dec-05, at 11:08 AM, Kirk Grell wrote:
> I could bump down to PVR-150. Main thing is that I
> really want as high quality of video as I can get
> before transcoding. In terms of MPEG2, does output
> from the PVR-150 look as good
On 12/16/05, Kirk Grell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Andrew Close <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 12/16/05, Kirk Grell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I'm building my first MythTV box. It'll be a back
> end
> > > box that I'll admin remotely (web, rsh, ftp, etc).
> > > It's sole purpose r
On 16-Dec-05, at 11:08 AM, Kirk Grell wrote:
I could bump down to PVR-150. Main thing is that I
really want as high quality of video as I can get
before transcoding. In terms of MPEG2, does output
from the PVR-150 look as good as output from the
PVR-350?
The 150 tuner chips are more recent t
--- Andrew Close <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/16/05, Kirk Grell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm building my first MythTV box. It'll be a back
end
> > box that I'll admin remotely (web, rsh, ftp, etc).
> > It's sole purpose right now will be to schedule
> > recordings and transcode them t
On 12/16/05, Kirk Grell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm building my first MythTV box. It'll be a back end
> box that I'll admin remotely (web, rsh, ftp, etc).
> It's sole purpose right now will be to schedule
> recordings and transcode them to smaller video files
> for pulling later to my PC at a
I'm building my first MythTV box. It'll be a back end
box that I'll admin remotely (web, rsh, ftp, etc).
It's sole purpose right now will be to schedule
recordings and transcode them to smaller video files
for pulling later to my PC at a different location.
I'm not planning for any other MythTV
12 matches
Mail list logo
