Michael T. Dean wrote:
On 11/05/05 02:21, ffrr wrote:
Michael T. Dean wrote:
Overscan settings for the NVIDIA cards only apply to TV out.
That settles that then,t hanks.
What happens when you set the /Myth/ overscan to 0?
Mike
The picture seems to maximise, i.e. fit th
On 11/05/05 02:21, ffrr wrote:
Michael T. Dean wrote:
Overscan settings for the NVIDIA cards only apply to TV out.
That settles that then,t hanks.
What happens when you set the /Myth/ overscan to 0?
Mike
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-user
Michael T. Dean wrote:
On 11/05/05 01:12, ffrr wrote:
Overscan settings for the NVIDIA cards only apply to TV out.
That settles that then,t hanks.
However, if you're saying that you're losing the top and bottom of
your picture when a 16:9 video is displayed letterboxed in Myth, then
ov
On 11/05/05 01:12, ffrr wrote:
There is one 'nvidia-settings' and some messages I read say they
adjusted overscan using it, but when I run it, I can find no setting
related to this. Maybe my very old TNT2 card, without TV out (I am
using an external converter) doesn't have these settings.
ffrr wrote:
Nick wrote:
You needn't have to directly edit the config files if your video
drivers provide their own graphical configuration tool. Using my ATI
driver tool, as was able to adjust overscan to make the output centred
on my TV. When I checked the xorg.conf file, it had added the o
Nick wrote:
You needn't have to directly edit the config files if your video
drivers provide their own graphical configuration tool. Using my ATI
driver tool, as was able to adjust overscan to make the output centred
on my TV. When I checked the xorg.conf file, it had added the overscan
comman
On 05/11/05, ffrr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nick wrote:
>
> >On 04/11/05, ffrr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Initially, the bottom 10% or more is missing, a bit too much to ignore.
> >>I tried adjusting the overscan/underscan in the playback setup section,
> >>but it doesn't seem to do
Nick wrote:
On 04/11/05, ffrr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Initially, the bottom 10% or more is missing, a bit too much to ignore.
I tried adjusting the overscan/underscan in the playback setup section,
but it doesn't seem to do what I expected. When I set it to about 10%,
the top and bottom 5
Michael T. Dean wrote:
ffrr wrote:
Initially, the bottom 10% or more is missing, a bit too much to
ignore. I tried adjusting the overscan/underscan in the playback
setup section, but it doesn't seem to do what I expected. When I set
it to about 10%, the top and bottom 5% or more of the pict
On 04/11/05, ffrr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Initially, the bottom 10% or more is missing, a bit too much to ignore.
> I tried adjusting the overscan/underscan in the playback setup section,
> but it doesn't seem to do what I expected. When I set it to about 10%,
> the top and bottom 5% or more o
ffrr wrote:
Initially, the bottom 10% or more is missing, a bit too much to
ignore. I tried adjusting the overscan/underscan in the playback
setup section, but it doesn't seem to do what I expected. When I set
it to about 10%, the top and bottom 5% or more of the picture are
missing. In oth
Initially, the bottom 10% or more is missing, a bit too much to ignore.
I tried adjusting the overscan/underscan in the playback setup section,
but it doesn't seem to do what I expected. When I set it to about 10%,
the top and bottom 5% or more of the picture are missing. In other
words, maki
12 matches
Mail list logo