Correct. Playback can go over a socket between a backend and
frontend but there is no socket for one backend to send data
to another backend to write the file (nor should there be).
Mythbackend just needs a path to a writable directory.
In other words, the master backend knows how to get
Chad, so what you're saying is that if you want to listen to music it
needs to be stored on an NFS mount (unless it's on a local disk)? So
in other words, if I have a master-backend machine that sits in the
basement with all the tuner cards and storage, and then a lightweight
frontend in my
Alex Brekken wrote:
On 7/9/05, Chad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just wanted to chime in and say that one does need NFS mounts IF
they are using mythvideo/mythmusic. I chose a central location for
these files, and they are a subdir of my existing MythTV recordings
directory, which is
Ok thanks, that makes sense.
On 7/9/05, Michael T. Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alex Brekken wrote:
On 7/9/05, Chad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just wanted to chime in and say that one does need NFS mounts IF
they are using mythvideo/mythmusic. I chose a central location for
these
Hey all, I'm currently running a combo frontend/backend machine which
has a 200 GB hard drive, and one PVR-250 tuner card. I'd like to add
a slave backend which would also have a PVR-250 tuner card and a 160
GB drive.
I feel like I have an OK understanding of how a distributed Myth
system will
On 7/8/05, Alex Brekken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all, I'm currently running a combo frontend/backend machine which
has a 200 GB hard drive, and one PVR-250 tuner card. I'd like to add
a slave backend which would also have a PVR-250 tuner card and a 160
GB drive.
Is the slave just for
On 7/8/05, Alex Brekken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all, I'm currently running a combo frontend/backend machine which
has a 200 GB hard drive, and one PVR-250 tuner card. I'd like to add
a slave backend which would also have a PVR-250 tuner card and a 160
GB drive.
I feel like I have an
Alex Brekken wrote:
Hey all, I'm currently running a combo frontend/backend machine which
has a 200 GB hard drive, and one PVR-250 tuner card. I'd like to add
a slave backend which would also have a PVR-250 tuner card and a 160
GB drive.
I feel like I have an OK understanding of how a
Thanks everyone, it sounds like I should stick with keeping local
drives in the machines.
One question Bruce about the NFS thing. Just so I'm understanding
this correctly, I don't need NFS drives in order for my combo
frontend/backend to be able to play a recording which was recorded on
the
Alex Brekken wrote:
...
One question Bruce about the NFS thing. Just so I'm understanding
this correctly, I don't need NFS drives in order for my combo
frontend/backend to be able to play a recording which was recorded on
the slave's local drive, correct? (including live TV)
NFS would only
10 matches
Mail list logo
