On 08/09/05, Dewey Smolka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/8/05, Todd Houle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I thought only the 350 had TV out. And the 150/500 has hardware
> > encoding, but not decoding. If I use a 500 or 150, then I'll still
> > need to find a way to connect the TV...Is ther
On 9/8/05, Todd Houle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought only the 350 had TV out. And the 150/500 has hardware
> encoding, but not decoding. If I use a 500 or 150, then I'll still
> need to find a way to connect the TV...Is there an inexpensive
> way to do that?
> -t-
Video card with
I thought only the 350 had TV out. And the 150/500 has hardware
encoding, but not decoding. If I use a 500 or 150, then I'll still
need to find a way to connect the TV...Is there an inexpensive
way to do that?
-t-
On Sep 6, 2005, at 10:53 AM, Ali Asad Lotia wrote:
The PVR 150 is
The PVR 150 is apparently a pretty decent card. I have a PVR-500 (dual
tuners, but similar to 150) and i've been quite happy. It doesn't have
a decoder on board, but i do that in software on my machine.
On 9/6/05, Anil Gupte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have been using the Hauppauge PVR 350
I have been using the Hauppauge PVR 350 with good success, but for my next
system I am looking to build cheaper. Is there any other card with an
Encoder/Decoder built-in that is cheaper? If not, how stable/reliable is a
card where the processing is being done by the CPU?
Thanx,
Anil Gupte
