Todd Ignasiak wrote:
Is Unichrome2 different than Unichrome Pro?
that was my question too! I didn't find it on the VIA site either.
I dnl'd the latest user donc of K8M800-MLVF and it mentions UniChrome2
not Pro
The Abit KV-80 specs say: "Integrated UniChrome Pro Graphics with
2D/3D/Vide
Is Unichrome2 different than Unichrome Pro?
The Abit KV-80 specs say: "Integrated UniChrome Pro Graphics with
2D/3D/Video controller"
http://www.abit-usa.com/products/mb/techspec.php?categories=1&model=238
The VIA pages on their chipsets with "Unichrome Pro" make plenty of
mention of MPEG2 decod
Todd Ignasiak wrote:
Is there anywhere all of this current status info is covered? The
K8M800 has "Unichrome Pro" integrated graphics, and I see mentions of
XvMC support for Unichrome Pro. But, will these two work together?
Yeah, it would be nice to know more about this.
I have a K8M800
Is there anywhere all of this current status info is covered? The
K8M800 has "Unichrome Pro" integrated graphics, and I see mentions of
XvMC support for Unichrome Pro. But, will these two work together?
On 8/2/05, David Collett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BEWARE:
>
> > decoding. From the u
BEWARE:
> decoding. From the unichrome sourceforge project site says: "It
> provides support for VIA CLE266 and KM400/KN400. K8M800 and
> PM800/CN400 support is still limited." I'm not sure if that
> statement is up to date. I have seen messages from people using the
> CN400.
That stateme
On Aug 1, 2005, at 10:34 PM, Marc Tousignant wrote:
Setup of nvidia + xvmc on Gentoo is well documented and went off
without a hitch using nvidia-kernel 1.0.7667. Over all I was
impressed with the results. Using xvmc I was able to easily playback
1080i clips with about 35% cpu use. Considering t
No, it uses the VIA K8M800. The CLE266 is the oldest chipset that
had this. I believe it was more limited than the later chipsets
(maybe this is the one that didn't support HD.. the others do.)
There are several VIA chipsets that support the hardware MPEG2
decoding. From the unichrome source
On Aug 1, 2005, at 9:13 PM, Todd Ignasiak wrote:
The Unichrome integrated graphics chipsets are available on more than
just Mini-ITX boards. VIA makes P4, Athlon, and even Athlon64 boards
with the Unichrome video.
Is this with the CLE266 chip? I thought that was the only one that
supported
The Unichrome integrated graphics chipsets are available on more than
just Mini-ITX boards. VIA makes P4, Athlon, and even Athlon64 boards
with the Unichrome video.
This seems like an interesting option to me.It allows for the most
offloading of MPEG2 processing, while still using a fast CPU
On 8/1/05, Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have the Myth developers considered adding the OSD grayscale work
> around from Xine to the Myth Internal Player or is that not something
> which is feasible?
There's a patch which enables color OSDs with XvMC, but the real
solution is to use a chromak
On Aug 1, 2005, at 12:52 PM, Donavan Stanley wrote:
Your stated goal was HDTV playback. Given that you're most likely
going to be playing back HD content using Myth not xine then it stands
to reason you'd actually test using Myth.
But seeing as I don't yet have a HDTV capture card yet I ended
On 8/1/05, Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You know, you *might* want to test with Myth instead of Xine since
> > neither of those issues apply to Myth.
>
> I'm assuming by 'Myth' you are referencing the Myth Internal video
> player?
Your stated goal was HDTV playback. Given that you're mos
On Aug 1, 2005, at 9:17 AM, Donavan Stanley wrote:
On 7/31/05, Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I had two issues that for me are critical.
When using xvmc with Xine none of the OSD overlays would work. This
meant no on screen information, subtitles, or closed captions during
playback. I did
On Aug 1, 2005, at 9:15 AM, Donavan Stanley wrote:
On 7/31/05, Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oh yeah, one more thing :) I thought I read that some or all of the
unichrome chips had a limitation on video out where they could not
output 1280x720 (720p) video or above. Obviously this is a pro
On 7/31/05, Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I had two issues that for me are critical.
>
> When using xvmc with Xine none of the OSD overlays would work. This
> meant no on screen information, subtitles, or closed captions during
> playback. I didn't investigate this to much however I think
On 7/31/05, Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh yeah, one more thing :) I thought I read that some or all of the
> unichrome chips had a limitation on video out where they could not
> output 1280x720 (720p) video or above. Obviously this is a problem if
> you're trying to hook your unichrome base
On Jul 31, 2005, at 4:55 PM, Scott wrote:
Another thing I'm interested in is the 'Unichrome' display adapters.
This S3/VIA video chips do full MPEG decoding, not just the iDCT+MC
done with XvMC. I don't know if it is any more/less capable with
things like de-interlacing. Also, the 'Unichrom
On Jul 31, 2005, at 3:06 PM, Todd Ignasiak wrote:
I've been doingh the same analysis on HD playback . I've been doing
XvMC with an FX5200 AGP card. When it's working well, it's very good.
But, I get the "prebuffering pause" issues, which causes choppy
playback
I don't have a tuner in my My
Hi Scott,
I've been doingh the same analysis on HD playback . I've been doing
XvMC with an FX5200 AGP card. When it's working well, it's very good.
But, I get the "prebuffering pause" issues, which causes choppy
playback.
I'm surprised that you were able to do HD playback via the PCI bus. I
Having been on the list for some time I was familiar with nvidia +
xvmc combination and wanted to try it out. I picked up an evga
GeForce FX 5200 PCI adapter and stuck it into my SIS based P4
Northwood 2.4GHz Pundit system. (Note: not the Pundit-R) Setup was
done under Gentoo 2005.0 using a
20 matches
Mail list logo
