Re: [mythtv-users] LiveTV isn't flexible enough about its inputs

2005-12-12 Thread Michael T. Dean
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 20:50:27 -0500 From: "Michael T. Dean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >, but I >haven't (yet) tested this thoroughly to see which way it works.) >Would unchecking that option allow LiveTV to grab the appropriate >input from any card, or is

[mythtv-users] LiveTV isn't flexible enough about its inputs

2005-12-12 Thread f-myth-users
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 20:50:27 -0500 From: "Michael T. Dean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >, but I >haven't (yet) tested this thoroughly to see which way it works.) >Would unchecking that option allow LiveTV to grab the appropriate >input from any card, or is this just an architect

Re: [mythtv-users] LiveTV isn't flexible enough about its inputs

2005-12-12 Thread Michael T. Dean
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I -do- have "avoid conflicts with recordings" checked, and I'm reluctant to uncheck it since I'd rather that LiveTV not step on a recording. (Though if -all- that button does is to change the priority of which card gets used for what, It does, as it says in the settin

[mythtv-users] LiveTV isn't flexible enough about its inputs

2005-12-10 Thread f-myth-users
In 0.18.1: [Is this fixed in SVN, given its complete rearchitecture of how LiveTV works? I'm not running SVN, so I can't easily check.] I've got a PVR-350 on an SBE/FE, and some PVR-250's on the MBE. One of the 250's has a composite input hooked to a cable box; all of the x50's have the same RF