I seemed to fix the framerate problem I was having. If anyone needs
advice with using a PVR-150 with a VIA KM-400 based board, email me
directly.
On 5/25/05, SB Childe Roland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you had any framerate issues?
On 5/25/05, Rickard Borgmäster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can't tell if a show was recorded on my 150 rather than my 350. Well worth
it, in my opinion. Amazon sells these cards for very cheap too.
82 USD from Amazon U.S., 100 pounds from Amazon UK. This makes PVR-250
bought locally in CZ significantly cheaper than PVR-150 bought from
Amazon UK.
I installed a new, external 300GB 1394 hard drive to act as video
storage. It seemed to be working fine as of this mornig when I left.
I'm sure I'll hear from my 75+ year old Linux using parents if it
fails!
What about live and recorded video? Is the video choppy?
Are the scaling issues
On Wed, 25 May 2005 18:56:01 -0500
SB Childe Roland [EMAIL PROTECTED] hit the keyboard and
punched:
Have you had any framerate issues?
Yes, with older ivtv (something like 0.3.3...) I had low fps and slow
motion like picture. Don't know what I did to resolve it but I think
the problems
On 5/26/05, Milos Prudek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I installed a new, external 300GB 1394 hard drive to act as video
storage. It seemed to be working fine as of this mornig when I left.
I'm sure I'll hear from my 75+ year old Linux using parents if it
fails!
What about live and
On 5/26/05, Milos Prudek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I installed a new, external 300GB 1394 hard drive to act as video
storage. It seemed to be working fine as of this mornig when I left.
I'm sure I'll hear from my 75+ year old Linux using parents if it
fails!
What about live and
I want to warn that we are not very concerned about that stuff. My mom
was taken ill a few weeks ago and I built this quickly so she could
OK. I will use X to run Myth and display recorded shows, not TV out.
Looks like PVR-150 is good enough for me. It's not available yet in my
country, and
Not sure. the most obvious good feature about the 150 is contrary to
the Hauppage site which says the '150 is the priced reduced version of
the 250' it appears that the 150 with the 0.3.3k driver is actually
dual tuner. However I haven't tried recording from the second tuner
yet.
And you won't
On 5/26/05, Robert Kulagowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not sure. the most obvious good feature about the 150 is contrary to
the Hauppage site which says the '150 is the priced reduced version of
the 250' it appears that the 150 with the 0.3.3k driver is actually
dual tuner. However I
That said it could all be smoke and mirrors. Maybe there is only a
single tuner and maybe software is remembering which channel to show
me. I don't know.
The important issue would be setting it up to use both and then seeing
if the MPEG encoder will encode both at the same time. Even with two
What if you have two pvr-150's? will the second video be real then? or
will there be /dev/video0-3?
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 11:12 -0500, Robert Kulagowski wrote:
Not sure. the most obvious good feature about the 150 is contrary to
the Hauppage site which says the '150 is the priced reduced
What if you have two pvr-150's? will the second video be real then? or
will there be /dev/video0-3?
You'll have /dev/video0 with Tuner 0 and 1, /dev/video1 with Tuner 0 and
1, etc.
Ask over on the ivtv list why there are multiple tuner, composite and
s-video devices created for each
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 03:36:55PM -0500, Robert Kulagowski wrote:
What if you have two pvr-150's? will the second video be real then? or
will there be /dev/video0-3?
You'll have /dev/video0 with Tuner 0 and 1, /dev/video1 with Tuner 0 and
1, etc.
Ask over on the ivtv list why there are
You could also use the 0.2 stable drivers. Support for the 150 has
been backported to them as well. It works OK, but still has a few
issues (scaling is not supported). Sound has issues off and on, but I
haven't seen that too much.
Scaling works fine with my PVR-150 and the latest ivtv
What is the current status of PVR-150 support in relation to Myth?
If I use development ivtv drivers, will I get the same functionality as
with PVR-250? Including the ability to use remote control? The same wife
acceptance factor? The same stability?
--
Milos Prudek
On 5/25/05, Milos Prudek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the current status of PVR-150 support in relation to Myth?
If I use development ivtv drivers, will I get the same functionality as
with PVR-250? Including the ability to use remote control? The same wife
acceptance factor? The same
On 5/25/05, Jason Werpy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/25/05, Milos Prudek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the current status of PVR-150 support in relation to Myth?
If I use development ivtv drivers, will I get the same functionality as
with PVR-250? Including the ability to use remote
The development (testing, whatever they're called) ivtv drivers work
great on my box. Running a PVR 250, 250MCE, and 500MCE. IR remote
connected connected to the PVR250 works fine too. I think I'm running
version 0.3.2.r. Super stable, WAF is very high.
I asked about PVR-150.
--
Milos Prudek
On Wed, 25 May 2005 13:20:31 +0200
Milos Prudek [EMAIL PROTECTED] hit the keyboard and punched:
What is the current status of PVR-150 support in relation to Myth?
If I use development ivtv drivers, will I get the same functionality as
with PVR-250? Including the ability to use remote
On Wed, 25 May 2005 13:20:31 +0200
Milos Prudek [EMAIL PROTECTED] hit the keyboard and punched:
What is the current status of PVR-150 support in relation to Myth?
If I use development ivtv drivers, will I get the same functionality as
with PVR-250? Including the ability to use remote
On 5/25/05, Milos Prudek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the current status of PVR-150 support in relation to Myth?
If I use development ivtv drivers, will I get the same functionality as
with PVR-250? Including the ability to use remote control? The same wife
acceptance factor? The same
On 5/25/05, Milos Prudek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the current status of PVR-150 support in relation to Myth?
If I use development ivtv drivers, will I get the same functionality as
with PVR-250? Including the ability to use remote control? The same wife
acceptance factor? The same
Have you had any framerate issues?
On 5/25/05, Rickard Borgmäster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2005 13:20:31 +0200
Milos Prudek [EMAIL PROTECTED] hit the keyboard and punched:
What is the current status of PVR-150 support in relation to Myth?
If I use development ivtv
23 matches
Mail list logo