On 5/27/05, Craig Partin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/25/05, Greg Depasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 5/24/05, Michael T. Dean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > You know what the really annoying thing is. Since Joe Public doesn't
> > > know what HDCP stands for--and typically guess
On 5/27/05, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/27/05, Kyle Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I was looking at TVs at Best Buy recently and thought it was funny
> > > that they had HDCP on all the sets as if it were a feature.
> >
> > Sadly, it's a feature in the same sense that a rob
On 5/27/05, Kyle Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I was looking at TVs at Best Buy recently and thought it was funny
> > that they had HDCP on all the sets as if it were a feature.
>
> Sadly, it's a feature in the same sense that a robber that takes only
> appliances and not jewelry is a featur
> I was looking at TVs at Best Buy recently and thought it was funny
> that they had HDCP on all the sets as if it were a feature.
Sadly, it's a feature in the same sense that a robber that takes only
appliances and not jewelry is a feature that might make him more
acceptable than a robber who ste
On 5/25/05, Greg Depasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/24/05, Michael T. Dean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > You know what the really annoying thing is. Since Joe Public doesn't
> > know what HDCP stands for--and typically guesses it's some "High
> > Definition" thing--the marketing guys
On 5/25/05, Greg Depasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/24/05, Michael T. Dean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > You know what the really annoying thing is. Since Joe Public doesn't
> > know what HDCP stands for--and typically guesses it's some "High
> > Definition" thing--the marketing guys
On 5/24/05, Michael T. Dean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You know what the really annoying thing is. Since Joe Public doesn'tknow what HDCP stands for--and typically guesses it's some "HighDefinition" thing--the marketing guys actually have people believing
they're getting a good thing when the TV s
On 5/25/05, Simon Kenyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 24 May 2005 21:39, Greg Grotsky wrote:> That is horrible. I'm planning on getting a Sammy DLP, only I'm> planning on using the DVI. There's no HDCP on DVI, right? Why would> they even bother putting a restriction like that when you c
On Tuesday 24 May 2005 21:39, Greg Grotsky wrote:
> That is horrible. I'm planning on getting a Sammy DLP, only I'm
> planning on using the DVI. There's no HDCP on DVI, right? Why would
> they even bother putting a restriction like that when you can get
> around it with DVI?
>
> -Greg
>
> On 5/2
Greg Grotsky wrote:
On 5/24/05, Thor Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Another consideration about Samsung, is iirc there was someone on this
list that couldn't get mythtv over the HDMI port. After much
headbanging, he found that Samsung wouldn't accept HDMI without
HDCP...
That is h
That is horrible. I'm planning on getting a Sammy DLP, only I'm
planning on using the DVI. There's no HDCP on DVI, right? Why would
they even bother putting a restriction like that when you can get
around it with DVI?
-Greg
On 5/24/05, Thor Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another consider
Another consideration about Samsung, is iirc there was someone on this
list that couldn't get mythtv over the HDMI port. After much
headbanging, he found that Samsung wouldn't accept HDMI without
HDCP...
-Thor Johnson
On 5/22/05, Bernd Paysan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 22 May 2005 17
On Sunday 22 May 2005 17:52, Boleslaw Ciesielski wrote:
> Matt Mossholder wrote:
> > It's my understanding that this is a limitation of HDMI/DVI, not
> > something that Samsung chose not to implement. It doesn't support
> > enough bandwidth to do 1080p.
>
> This is not true. There are several LCD m
I'm not particularly sure how my LCD did this, but when I took DVI
from my HD cable box, the LCD switched over to 1920x1079 60Hz (per the
info screen on the LCD). It doesn't really seem right that it should
have been able to do this, since its only a 19" LCD that normally has
a native res of 1280x
Matt Mossholder wrote:
It's my understanding that this is a limitation of HDMI/DVI, not
something that Samsung chose not to implement. It doesn't support enough
bandwidth to do 1080p.
This is not true. There are several LCD monitors (e.g. Dell 2405FP) that
support 1920x1200 (progressive of cou
15 matches
Mail list logo
