On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 08:27:31PM -0800, Chuck Rice wrote:
Upgrade yum, or even better: use apt. :)
The errors from apt-get are even worse. :(
How did they look like?
I have tried updating yum. No Joy.
Things are different, but not better. -Chuck-
Looks like the bug in yum is
At 12:53 PM +0100 12/27/04, Axel Thimm wrote:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
4Suite: Depends: libc.so.6()(64bit)
Depends: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
Depends: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit)
Depends: libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
Depends:
At 5:47 PM +0100 12/27/04, Axel Thimm wrote:
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=fqQSV+MVmQEkpBtA
Content-Disposition: inline
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 08:15:54AM -0800, Chuck Rice wrote:
At 3:43 PM +0100 12/27/04, Axel Thimm wrote:
At 12:41 PM +0100 12/26/04, Axel Thimm wrote:
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=VSaCG/zfRnOiPJtU
Content-Disposition: inline
On Sat, Dec 25, 2004 at 08:04:23PM -0800, Chuck Rice wrote:
When I get an error installing a system for
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 08:04:59AM -0800, Chuck Rice wrote:
At 12:41 PM +0100 12/26/04, Axel Thimm wrote:
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=VSaCG/zfRnOiPJtU
Content-Disposition: inline
On Sat, Dec 25, 2004 at 08:04:23PM -0800,
At 4:03 AM +0100 12/27/04, Axel Thimm wrote:
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=YttKMwf6abDJOSyE
Content-Disposition: inline
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 08:04:59AM -0800, Chuck Rice wrote:
At 12:41 PM +0100 12/26/04, Axel Thimm wrote:
On Sun, 2004-12-26 at 20:27 -0800, Chuck Rice wrote:
Looks like the bug in yum is still there ... :/
Please use apt.
The full output from apt-get is rather large, I can send it if you
want. But it starts with:
snip
I just went through the same thing. I ended up using smart instead. I
