On 9/16/05, Dave Sherohman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 10:31:47AM -0400, Scot L. Harris wrote:
> > I think I am seeing the exact same problem. I just tried to manually
> > adjust the brightness setting on the second tuner on the PVR-500.
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ivtvc
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 12:24:36PM -0400, Scot L. Harris wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 12:17, Chris Camisa wrote:
> > Any suggestions on identifying which of the pvr-500mce cards are
> > potentially flawed?
> >
>
> No idea. I received my card on 9/7/5. So it may be a new problem. Not
> sure w
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 12:17, Chris Camisa wrote:
> Any suggestions on identifying which of the pvr-500mce cards are
> potentially flawed?
>
No idea. I received my card on 9/7/5. So it may be a new problem. Not
sure when the others received their cards so don't know if that is a
good way to det
Any suggestions on identifying which of the pvr-500mce cards are
potentially flawed?
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 11:54 -0400, Scot L. Harris wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 11:10, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 10:31:47AM -0400, Scot L. Harris wrote:
> > > I think I am seeing the exa
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 11:10, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 10:31:47AM -0400, Scot L. Harris wrote:
> > I think I am seeing the exact same problem. I just tried to manually
> > adjust the brightness setting on the second tuner on the PVR-500.
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ivtvctl
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 10:31:47AM -0400, Scot L. Harris wrote:
> I think I am seeing the exact same problem. I just tried to manually
> adjust the brightness setting on the second tuner on the PVR-500.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ivtvctl -d /dev/video2 --set-ctrl=brightness=128
I just tried this
Good idea about testing it in Windows, I thought it just couldn't be
one broken tuner out of two, I figured it had to be the whole card or
nothing, but man was I wrong. Let me tell you, it is really
killer living without my card for this long. I figured they'd
have it right back to me, but of cou
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 09:58, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 10:52:46PM -0700, Stefan Wrobel wrote:
>
> > I had the same problem and thought that it was a configuration problem. I
> > tried and tried and tried to get it to work, but finally I got wise and
> > fired the card up o
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 10:52:46PM -0700, Stefan Wrobel wrote:
> Eolake,
It's Dave, actually... My .sig is just a quote from Eolake (and is
seems that the article I'm quoting has disappeared, so I need to find
a new .sig anyhow).
> I had the same problem and thought that it was a configuration p
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 01:52, Stefan Wrobel wrote:
> Eolake,
> I had the same problem and thought that it was a configuration
> problem. I tried and tried and tried to get it to work, but finally I
> got wise and fired the card up on a windows box ... the 2nd tuner was
> dead. I have since sent it
Eolake,
I had the same problem and thought that it was a configuration
problem. I tried and tried and tried to get it to work, but
finally I got wise and fired the card up on a windows box ... the 2nd
tuner was dead. I have since sent it back to Hauppauge and am
awaiting a replacement. Hopefully
11 matches
Mail list logo
