On 4/5/05, A. Heinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
I am running very reliably with a PVR-150. I put some notes for the
PVR-150 on the KnoppMythWiki for Knoppmyth R5. They may be a good
starting point for getting a PVR-500 going. I used Jarod's and others
instructions from
Hi Group,
At the moment I'm using Myth 0.18 (knoppMyth install)
along with my PVR250. This works fine, no problems.
But like any man out there, I WANT MORE :)
I'm thinking of buying a PVR150 or PVR500 card to extend
the recording possibilities of MythTv. Is there any reason why
i can't use a
Hi,
There are problems, but they may be fixable in some cases. There is an
issue with the kernel modules used by the two types of cards. Also, a
150 or 500-card seems to require an unstable ivtv version. My PVR-350
and PVR-150 work ok though... now.
Check my blog for info.
/Fredrik
On 6/30/05,
On Mar 29, 2005 11:44 AM, A. Heinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 02:25:52 +0100, Örn Einar Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Þann Föstudagur 25 mars 2005 18:57 skrifaði A. Heinen:
I am running very reliably with a PVR-150. I put some notes for the
PVR-150 on the
On Apr 5, 2005 4:45 PM, Lane Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 29, 2005 11:44 AM, A. Heinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 02:25:52 +0100, Örn Einar Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Þann Föstudagur 25 mars 2005 18:57 skrifaði A. Heinen:
I am running very
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 02:25:52 +0100, Örn Einar Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Þann Föstudagur 25 mars 2005 18:57 skrifaði A. Heinen:
I am running very reliably with a PVR-150. I put some notes for the
PVR-150 on the KnoppMythWiki for Knoppmyth R5. They may be a good
starting point for
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 16:50:53 -0600, Andrew Close [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 14:46:03 -0800, Jarod Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 24 March 2005 14:00, Andrew Close wrote:
i'm semi-hijacking this thread. ;)
has anyone been able to get either of these cards
I'll be happy to add my notes when I can find a good place to buy the
pvr-500 for a reasonable price.
Matt
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:57:31 -0600, A. Heinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 16:50:53 -0600, Andrew Close [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 14:46:03 -0800,
Þann Föstudagur 25 mars 2005 18:57 skrifaði A. Heinen:
I am running very reliably with a PVR-150. I put some notes for the
PVR-150 on the KnoppMythWiki for Knoppmyth R5. They may be a good
starting point for getting a PVR-500 going. I used Jarod's and others
instructions from the IVTV
At 12:20 AM 03/24/2005, you wrote:
Heh, oops. Picture quality is excellent here. :-)
Of course, a lot of that has to do with the signal you're feeding to the card
(or splitter) in the first place. How it compares to a pair of 150s and an
external amp, I couldn't say, but I have no complaints about
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Mollman
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 9:13 AM
To: Discussion about mythtv
Subject: Re: [mythtv-users] pvr150 or pvr500
At 12:20 AM 03/24/2005, you wrote:
Heh, oops. Picture quality is excellent
On Thursday 24 March 2005 06:34, Fred Stein wrote:
I looked up the PVR500 on the Happauge site and read that the card also
has two extra A/V headers on the card if you want to buy the optional
cables to use them. Would this allow you to input two SVideo signals
into the card so you would be
On Thursday 24 March 2005 06:13, Jason Mollman wrote:
At 12:20 AM 03/24/2005, you wrote:
Heh, oops. Picture quality is excellent here. :-)
Of course, a lot of that has to do with the signal you're feeding to the
card (or splitter) in the first place. How it compares to a pair of 150s
and
i'm semi-hijacking this thread. ;)
has anyone been able to get either of these cards to work fairly
reliably[1] with KnoppMyth[2]?
andy
[1] fairly reliably meaning that it's understood certain features of
the cards are not yet supported by the drivers
[2] the greatest Myth distro of all time
On Thursday 24 March 2005 14:00, Andrew Close wrote:
i'm semi-hijacking this thread. ;)
has anyone been able to get either of these cards to work fairly
reliably[1] with KnoppMyth[2]?
I did the bulk of my development work on my PVR-150 and 500 on a Debian box
(mix of testing and unstable,
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 14:46:03 -0800, Jarod Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 24 March 2005 14:00, Andrew Close wrote:
i'm semi-hijacking this thread. ;)
has anyone been able to get either of these cards to work fairly
reliably[1] with KnoppMyth[2]?
I did the bulk of my
At 04:56 PM 03/24/2005, you wrote:
Uh, what? No card has a tuner that changes the channels on a cable box.
That's
done via firewire, serial or something like an IRBlaster. The on-board tuners
can only change their own channels, and that's the same for every card...
Both tuners can be used
On Thursday 24 March 2005 19:22, Jason Mollman wrote:
At 04:56 PM 03/24/2005, you wrote:
Uh, what? No card has a tuner that changes the channels on a cable box.
That's
done via firewire, serial or something like an IRBlaster. The on-board
tuners can only change their own channels, and that's
Anyone have any experience about which way to go on this? The price
is fairly simular when you consider the 500 has two tuners. Any
advantages, gotchas to decide whether to buy two pvr150's or one
pvr500?
___
mythtv-users mailing list
Does the 500 come with the remote?
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:32:00 -0600, Dan Littlejohn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone have any experience about which way to go on this? The price
is fairly simular when you consider the 500 has two tuners. Any
advantages, gotchas to decide whether to buy two
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:32:00 -0600, Dan Littlejohn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone have any experience about which way to go on this? The price
is fairly simular when you consider the 500 has two tuners. Any
advantages, gotchas to decide whether to buy two pvr150's or one
pvr500?
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 12:36, Matthew K. Lee wrote:
Does the 500 come with the remote?
No. The 500 only comes in an MCE variant, the 150 in both a retail and MCE
variant. None of the MCE cards come with a remote.
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:32:00 -0600, Dan Littlejohn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 12:32, Dan Littlejohn wrote:
Anyone have any experience about which way to go on this? The price
is fairly simular when you consider the 500 has two tuners. Any
advantages, gotchas to decide whether to buy two pvr150's or one
pvr500?
With the 500, you need an
I'd definitely go
500, since you don't even need a splitter to get both tuners fed (the signal
is split internally).
Jarod, can you elaborate on this? Does this mean that if I want to
use both of the tuners I can run a single RG6 cable to one of the
inputs, then it'll split the signal off to
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 16:36:32 -0600, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd definitely go
500, since you don't even need a splitter to get both tuners fed (the signal
is split internally).
Jarod, can you elaborate on this? Does this mean that if I want to
use both of the tuners I can run a
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 14:44, John Williams wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 16:36:32 -0600, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd definitely go
500, since you don't even need a splitter to get both tuners fed (the
signal is split internally).
Jarod, can you elaborate on this? Does this
Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 14:44, John Williams wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 16:36:32 -0600, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd definitely go
500, since you don't even need a splitter to get both tuners fed (the
signal is split internally).
Jarod, can you elaborate on this? Does
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 14:52, Phil Bridges wrote:
Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 14:44, John Williams wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 16:36:32 -0600, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd definitely go
500, since you don't even need a splitter to get both tuners fed (the
signal
Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 14:52, Phil Bridges wrote:
Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 14:44, John Williams wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 16:36:32 -0600, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd definitely go
500, since you don't even need a splitter to get both tuners fed
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 15:11, Phil Bridges wrote:
I'd definitely go
500, since you don't even need a splitter to get both tuners fed (the
signal is split internally).
Jarod, can you elaborate on this? Does this mean that if I want to
use both of the tuners I can run a single RG6 cable
30 matches
Mail list logo
