True, but if you have like a ten year old pci one or something, that
should let you boot.
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 22:49:31 -, Will <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Your current PIII has a VGA card now, right? So you can get the OS
> > up-and-running
> > with that. Then add a PVR-350 and get X
Your current PIII has a VGA card now, right? So you can get the OS
up-and-running
with that. Then add a PVR-350 and get X running on it (because at only 800
MHz the
hardware decoder will help with MythTV) then you can remove the VGA card
if you
want. This would make an OK box for NTSC, so start
On 2 Dec 2004 at 10:24, Cook, Garry wrote:
> > What is your display? I run a projector that the PVR-350 can't drive
> > anyway, so for me it's a no-brainer, I use a PVR250.
>
> I'm still a noob, so just getting used to the new acronyms. My main TV
> has an Svideo input, which I believe is NTSC, p
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 30 Nov 2004 at 8:31, Cook, Garry wrote:
>
>> although the answer to #1 has me confused again.
>
> Maybe I can add to your confusion ;-)
Actually Marvin, you cleared up quite a bit for me. Thanks for all of
the great information!
I do have a few remaining questions
Any chance of support for the fusion QAM line of HDTV cards?
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 13:53:33 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 30 Nov 2004 at 8:31, Cook, Garry wrote:
>
> > although the answer to #1 has me confused again.
>
> Maybe I can add to your confusion ;-)
> >
> > >
> On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 16:07 -0600, Neil wrote:
>
> 1. What card should I use to capture regular channels?
Hauppauge PVR-250
> 2. What card should I use to capture hdtv signals(OTA is fine)?
pcHDTV HD-3000
> 3. What software should I use to record those signals to my hard
On 30 Nov 2004 at 8:31, Cook, Garry wrote:
> although the answer to #1 has me confused again.
Maybe I can add to your confusion ;-)
>
> >From what Wayne says, the PVR250 may be better for me, because while I
> don't have HDTV capabilities right now, I will most likely want them in
> the future