Hmmm. I thought they could do 1080i in other non-free OSes, so I bet
it's not a hardware limitation. I mean, they say they can do
2048x1526 (or more depending on the card) over vga. A linux driver
issue is possiable, though (which might include firmware if that is
loaded by the driver.)
I'd giv
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 07:13:17PM -0500, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 12:32:19PM -0800, nate s wrote:
> > > But yes, I would like to see DVI working from linux. I mean I have
> > > seen it (With a Radeon 9200se) but the drivers can't go more than 1600
> > > wide for xvideo as
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 12:32:19PM -0800, nate s wrote:
> > But yes, I would like to see DVI working from linux. I mean I have
> > seen it (With a Radeon 9200se) but the drivers can't go more than 1600
> > wide for xvideo as of now, and the proprietary drivers are limited to
> > older kernels than
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 12:32:19PM -0800, nate s wrote:
> > But yes, I would like to see DVI working from linux. I mean I have
> > seen it (With a Radeon 9200se) but the drivers can't go more than 1600
> > wide for xvideo as of now, and the proprietary drivers are limited to
> > older kernels than
: Re: [mythtv-users] Nvidia DVI vs ATI
> But yes, I would like to see DVI working from linux. I mean I have
> seen it (With a Radeon 9200se) but the drivers can't go more than 1600
> wide for xvideo as of now, and the proprietary drivers are limited to
> older kernels than I hav
> But yes, I would like to see DVI working from linux. I mean I have
> seen it (With a Radeon 9200se) but the drivers can't go more than 1600
> wide for xvideo as of now, and the proprietary drivers are limited to
> older kernels than I have, or so they say..
I haven't heard anything about ati's
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 05:51:31AM +, Simon Williams wrote:
> output at 1080i or 1080p from this card. I have found a not
> unreasonably priced fanless 6800 from gigabyte. Its more than I would
> have thought to spend on just a PVR but with a powerful card like this
> I think UT2K4 would look e
Ok so some hours spent testing various modelines via analogue and
digital has revealed that it is definitely not possible to get DVI-D
output at 1080i or 1080p from this card. I have found a not
unreasonably priced fanless 6800 from gigabyte. Its more than I would
have thought to spend on just a PV
I've never been able to get 1080i working using DVI either. Its ends up
looking "choppy." I'm hoping they'll fix this in a driver release one
of these days ...
Brad Templeton wrote:
On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 06:20:38PM +, Simon Williams wrote:
The image the DVI-D connection produces ( va
> Also seen a Volari V3 card for $45 at Tiger Direct, anybody tried
that.
I've been watching the Volari V3. Here's the readme for the driver for
Linux (the driver hasn't been updated since Sept):
Volari V3 Linux Readme :Update -2004-0815
FAQ:
...clip...
4.Major Known Issues
Ans: All dr
On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 06:20:38PM +, Simon Williams wrote:
> The image the DVI-D connection produces ( valid modeline ) appears as
> if the interlaced fields are shifted vertically out of alignment. With
> one field displaying 10-15 lines higher than the other.
>
> On my search for a card tha
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 13:36:42 -0800, nate s <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agreed. In posting that, I didn't mean to be doing any
> scaremongering. I mostly found it to be usefull information on the
> DVI spec.
>
> I don't at all think that people should shun nvidia and buy only ati
> cards for dvi
Agreed. In posting that, I didn't mean to be doing any
scaremongering. I mostly found it to be usefull information on the
DVI spec.
I don't at all think that people should shun nvidia and buy only ati
cards for dvi now, indeed, I think nvidia cards have better drivers,
and thus may be a better o
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 10:35:16PM -0800, nate s wrote:
> While that's true, that all of the eye diagrams showed were ok, the
> ones with the on-chip nvidia were shown at 141mhz, because they were
> not compliant at 162mhz. This of course only matters at very high
> resolutions.
... and on long c
While that's true, that all of the eye diagrams showed were ok, the
ones with the on-chip nvidia were shown at 141mhz, because they were
not compliant at 162mhz. This of course only matters at very high
resolutions.
-Nate
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 00:03:53 +1100, Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 09:02:34AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> After reading the article re. DVI compliance...
>
> So it looks like ATI cards are working better than NVidia for DVI. I am
> looking
> to by a TV that takes DVI and I am concerned about the compliance of Nvidia
> cards. Are t
16 matches
Mail list logo
