On 12/9/05, Prashant Nadgir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i tried to access http:./. /nagios browser is prompting for user name and
> passwd
> although i enter correct user name and passwd,i am getting "authentication
> failed or bad passwd "
>
>
> I have created .htaccess in /usr/local/nagios/sbin
i tried to access http:./. /nagios
browser is prompting for user name and passwd
although i enter correct user name and passwd,i am getting
"authentication failed or bad passwd "
I have created .htaccess
in /usr/local/nagios/sbin directory.
I have also put the same file in /usr/local/nagi
I'm not entirely sure I am configuring this properly to achieve my goal,
so I'll state this shortly and then give the details below. The
question comes down to this:
Should a failed service check for a dependent trigger a check of its
parent before continuing? If this is not the case, or
On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 11:17 +1300, Steve Shipway wrote:
> We are running Nagios with LDAP here fine. We use mod_auth_ldap (in
> Apache2), which is much better (I have no experience with authz_ldap, but I
> tried the Muquit one before and it works OK). This returns the username as
> whatever we de
> Purdue has implemented a new security policy that says that
> all passwords, whatever they are for, must be changed every
> 30 days.
Ouch. Sounds like a knee-jerk response. Be prepared for less security as
people find they have to write down these constantly change passwords...
but anyway,
Yes, mine are populating correctly with the short username.
>From the info at the top of a page:
Last Updated: Thu Dec 8 14:02:46 PST 2005
Updated every 60 seconds
Nagios(r) - www.nagios.org
Logged in as cwaters
And when an authenticated user acks an alert, it records the same data.
What was
FYI, in the time it's taking to wait for nagios to start polling
anything after starting it up I decided to look at what it's doing...
This would explain why it starts up and sits around not consuming any
cycles but not polling. Sleep left in the code? These entries in the
log each come af
On 12/8/05, Patrick Rutkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's fixed, I didn't know that the only alloweable user macros were
> $USER1$ - $USER32$; thanks for you help ;)
Well done! And you are welcome.
Aleksey
---
This SF.net email is spons
I'm switching over to using auth_kerb from AD (just because I've done
that, not the authz_ldap).
I'm curious if you both have the username being populated properly in
the "Author" portion of the CGI's when you're adding comments/ ack'ing
events.
I still haven't gotten any suggestions from
I am using authz_ldap and don't seem to have that problem. Can you show the
config for your module? What is your LDAP store??? AD,OpenLDAP...I am
authenticating my users against an M$ Active Directory. Works pretty well.
I would include your .htaccess code as well. That way we can compare them
> > On 12/8/05, Patrick Rutkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > If I put $USER1$ where full path is supposed to be in
> > > checkcommands.cfg then the command starts failing and returning wonky
> > > undefined results. If I acutally type out the full path instead of
> > > using the macro, things
Well my problem isn't that easy. I agree that Acking the Root problem
should be simple and a single click away. However, (from a previous
posting)...
Well I would agree, however I have also posted a question in this list
about Sounds. Nagios does see only one Host as being down, while 99
ar
Can someone confirm my belief on this is proper?
I used this same config several weeks ago ( just changed membership to a
different hostgroup ) and I was not receiving any alerts on this
hostgroup then.
Since moving to 2.0b6 (from b4) I'm changing hostgroup membership back
to this "non-aler
We have been testing out Nagios 1.3 in a distributed monitoring fashion.
Everything seems to be working fine with the exception of the reports
listing the devices in a undetermined status. This is the case whether
the host is actively checking or receiving passive check results. Below
listed is a
You could add a parent to those hosts in order to group them. Then the 100
powered-off hosts would be marked unreachable and you'd only have to
acknowledge that one parent host.
The 'parent' host does not have to be the real network-parent. Just some
reliable host that will help indicate the pow
Greetings, everyone. We (Purdue College of Pharmacy, Nursing and Health
Sciences) have been using nagios for half of a year now, and it has been really
handy. Currently, we are trying to change the way nagios authenticates users.
Purdue has implemented a new security policy that says that all
I have 1.4.1 of the plugins and it was
included in the distribution. I checked the REQUIREMENTS file and didn’t
see any prereqs for getting it to compile and install. I do use check_tcp to
verify that our Meeting Maker software is listening on the proper port, so that’s
probably a valid opt
Well I would agree, however I have also posted a question in this list
about Sounds. Nagios does see only one Host as being down, while 99
are Unreachable. The problem I'm trying to avoid is when the cgi.cfg
has Host, Critical, and Warning sounds turned on, the Nagios webpages
keep sending ou
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when
reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk
being sent to /dev/null
Linux 2.6.9-22.0.1.EL (CentOS 4.2)
Plugins: nagios-plugins 1.4.2
-Shawn
---
This
Greetings list,
On a new installation of Nagios 1.3, I am seeing services go from HARD
OK immediately to HARD CRITICAL when they fail. I have
max_check_attempts set to 3, and the Nagios web interface does indeed
display 'Current attempt: 1/3'.
Oddly enough, if I HUP nagios the check attempts
Todd,
I don't have that plugin in my listing, which I thought was kind
of odd but I guess that check_ssmtp = Secure SMTP. Further research has found
that the check_ssmtp plugin is the check_tcp plugin yet forces the -S (SSL)
check. Which explains a lot. I guess I could just use check_
On 12/8/05, Scott Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone would have a script they wrote, or copied from
> somewhere, to acknowledge multiple Devices/Hosts that are down at one
> time instead of having to goto each individual Host and Ack.
>
> I.e., one building is down without
Why not use check_smtp instead? I don’t
think port 25 is an SSL port within sendmail, although I’m no sendmail
expert. I use check_smtp in my configuration and it works fine.
Todd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Pearson
On 12/8/05, Patrick Rutkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If I put $USER1$ where full path is supposed to be incheckcommands.cfg then the command starts failing and returning wonky
undefined results. If I acutally type out the full path instead ofusing the macro, things work again. Sames goes if I
Hi everyone,
I am up to adding our mail servers to our nagios monitoring
list and hit a roadblock with monitoring sendmail. I have tried using the
following command at the cmdline:
./check_ssmtp -w 5 -c 10 -H mail -p 25
But I get the following error message:
CRITICAL - Cannot
I was wondering if anyone would have a script they wrote, or copied from
somewhere, to acknowledge multiple Devices/Hosts that are down at one
time instead of having to goto each individual Host and Ack.
I.e., one building is down without power, and we have 100
Switches/Routers in this buildin
Hi, Patrick. I had some trouble with $USER$ macros too at start, if that's what you are talking about.
But I got it working with some help from the list.
How does it break your configs?
-at
On 12/8/05, Patrick Rutkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm running nagios 1.3 and using the whole $st
I'm running nagios 1.3 and using the whole $stuff$ idea with
resources.cfg breaks my configs, is it supposed to work on 1.3 anyway,
or is this a 2.x specific feature?
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log fil
Title: Passive service freshness check syntax
As a follow, up, setting it as below caused the
freshness checks to start working.
However, in the GUI, they are listed as disabled
problems, not unhandled problems. Which is an issue. When a freshness check
trigger a critical, I want it to be a
Title: Passive service freshness check syntax
Did the methodology for passive service freshness checks change at some point.
I have my config set up as
Check_period none
passive_checks_enabled 1
Active_checks_enabled 1
Which if I recall was to allow active c
It needs to be defined in your checkcommands.cfg or misccommands.cfg before
you define it in your services.cfg.
Todd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick
Rutkowski
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 10:51 AM
To: nagios-users@lists.sourc
I have both check_http and check_disk_smb in /usr/lib/nagios/plugins.
If I try to load a services.cfg with "check_command" set to
"check_http", things work fine; however, trying "check_disk_smb" fails
with:
Error: Service check command 'check_disk_smb' specified in service
'WikiDB/Jason' for host
That is a possibility (only enabling the Host Down sounds). We like
having the sounds for Critical and Warnings as well. Otherwise the NOC
typically will not look at the Nagios webpage. Hence why they stated
the Sound was just 'so' important to them.
If all the devices are Acked then there are
Got it.
Here's what I'm getting now.
--
$ make all
cd ./base && make
gcc -O2 -I/usr/local/lib -D_ALL_SOURCE -D_ANSI_C_SOURCE
-D_POSIX_SOURCE -qmaxmem=16384 -qnoansialias -DUSE_NATIVE_DLOPE
We are trying to monitor (with Nagios, of course) a Microsft web server
set up in a Microsoft "clustered" environment. We have a couple of
issues, one is that when try to ping the cluster address we see
duplicate ping responses:
64 bytes from www.example.com (1.2.3.4): icmp_seq=3 ttl=116 time=
Hi Hugo.
yes thats not error but i dont why i am getting source of nagios main page ?
cos i've 2 computers on one freebsd installed and on the other debian.
nagios pages works fine on Freebsd but something wrong with debian.
couldnt get any page yet.
always getting source codes that says use a brow
Ok. It continues hanging...
Now I changed the REAPER from 5 to 2... Lets see..
Thanks
Fernando
-Mensagem original-
De: Marco Ramos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada: ter 06-dez-05 16:42
Para: Fernando Shayani
Cc: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.
Hi all my first post :)
We have Nagios 2.0b4 up and running and no problems there.
But i have now added som service checks which should only be reported to
certian people. (i.e contact group)
I have defined three contact_groups and 5 contacts in my setup
The problem is that with this perticula
Hi there,
Thank you so much for your fast reply. My contacts.cfg also enable the
following lines,
what else can I do? I was play around it near 1 month but still can't receive
service alert.
Thanks again,
Chung
Nagios 提到:
> Tou have to define it under the contact you wish to use this for.
>
Hi list,
As title, I tried to enable the commands as following:
# 'notify-by-email' command definition
define command{
command_namenotify-by-email
command_line/usr/bin/printf "%b" "* Nagios 1.0 *\n\nNotifica
tion Type: $NOTIFICATIONTYPE$\n\nService: $SERVICEDESC$\n
40 matches
Mail list logo
