Thanks 1000x. I am back on track.
Regards
Martin
On 6/13/06, Jedrzej Jajor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just found out that the CVS snapshot contains the fixed version.
>
> Regards,
> jj.
>
> Jedrzej Jajor wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > you are comparing different versions of the plugin. In
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Tim,
I would drop nrpe_nt on the Windows server because NSClient++ has its own built
in nrpe client. On the linux box you can use either check_nt or check_nrpe.
I use check_nrpe only I do not use check_nt for anything.
Here is an example that I
Hi David
Perhaps this is my mis-reading of the spec. It appears that there
is no requiremenet for Nagios to intepret the time field as a start
time. Some External Commands have explicit Start Time fields. Disable/En
able notifications do not. Too Bad!
- Dav
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim
Wilson
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 1:05 PM
To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Nagios-users] Connecting NRPE_NT and NSClient++
Hi all,
We're in the process of setting up monitoring of ou
Hi all,
We're in the process of setting up monitoring of our Windows servers
here, and I'm having trouble wrapping my brain around the
relationship between NRPE_NT and NSClient++. I've got both installed
on a Windows server and running as services. I can run a basic
'check_nrpe' from our L
I'm trying to install NagiosWeb2-1.3 but when I try to run nagiosweb.sql
against my empty database to set up the structure I get an error saying
"ERROR 1050 at line 19: Table 'command' already exists"
Does anyone have a solution to this error?
Joe
___
Hi,
I've just found out that the CVS snapshot contains the fixed version.
Regards,
jj.
Jedrzej Jajor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> you are comparing different versions of the plugin. In 1.4.3 there is
> new feature to test i-node usage (--iwarning, --icritical options). I
> suppose the bug is in the "-p" pa
Dear Thomas,
Thanks for the yip it really made me find something new.
Will actually I found that Host dependency is not what I need but
rather parent/child relationship is what will do my trick, by adding
the routers as hosts and have the parent part added to the hosts
config will make nagios fol
Hi,
you are comparing different versions of the plugin. In 1.4.3 there is
new feature to test i-node usage (--iwarning, --icritical options). I
suppose the bug is in the "-p" parameter handling. If you look into the
check_disk.c you can find four assingments around line 464. These are
w_df, c_df,
On 13 Jun, 2006, at 11:02, Mohamed Gombolaty wrote:
> - Will I have to write each host dependency on each router on the
> traceroute or will the dpendncy of the host on a router reachability,
> and then making the router dependant on another router will do the
> trick. (as far as I read the answer
Dear All,
I am currently making host dependencies and I really want to make sure
of the following points, as this will be a big one and I really wanna
make it as short and simple as possible:
- Will I have to write each host dependency on each router on the
traceroute or will the dpendncy of the
11 matches
Mail list logo