Rob Tanner said the following:
> Marc,
>
> The retain_status_information and retain_nonstatus_information options
> are both set to 1 in the default templates at the top of the hosts.cfg
> and services.cfg files and I am specifying those default templates for
> almost all of the service and host e
Hi,
I'm trying to differentiate in my event handler script between a recover
from a critical state and one from an unknown state.
I need to run a script upon a recovery, but only a recovery from a
critical hard state?
Is there a way to do this?
Nagios: Version 1.2
>From config files:
event_hand
Maybe one .cfg file is recursively including itself or another file that
has a cfg_dir or cfg_file directive. Some kind of recursion?
~~BAS
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 16:07 -0700, Nick Hayward wrote:
> Hi, any help you can give would be greatly appreciated.
>
> I receive this output:
> [EMAIL PROTEC
Hi, any help you can give would be greatly appreciated.
I receive this output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/nagios/bin# ./nagios -v
/usr/local/nagios/etc/nagios.cfg
Nagios 2.9
Copyright (c) 1999-2007 Ethan Galstad (http://www.nagios.org)
Last Modified: 04-10-2007
License: GPL
Reading configurati
Probably a typo on your config, the directive is:
retain_status_information, and you are using retain_state_information.
HTH,
Marcel
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 15:21 -0700, Rob Tanner wrote:
> Marc,
>
> The retain_status_information and retain_nonstatus_information options
> are both set to 1 in the
Marc,
The retain_status_information and retain_nonstatus_information options
are both set to 1 in the default templates at the top of the hosts.cfg
and services.cfg files and I am specifying those default templates for
almost all of the service and host entries.
Something else must still be
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nagios-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Tanner
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 4:24 PM
> To: Nagios Users Mailinglist
> Subject: [Nagios-users] Getting state retention to work
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to get state retent
Hi,
I'm trying to get state retention to work, but it doesn't seem to like
me very much. I've set the options in nagios.cfg the way I think they
are supposed to be set (see below) but the retention file continues to
have a size of 0 bytes and state is not retained between restarts. I am
usin
That is correct,
all standard versions of check_nt and check_nc_net Require a -l for the
CPULOAD. Check_nt will give you the error.
As for the result from the window plugin (NC_Net, NS_Clinet, NS_Client++)
they may/may not give a result if using a custom plugin. for example NC_Net
would respond w
Hugo,
thanks for your answer.
Hugo van der Kooij schrieb:
> On Wed, 8 Aug 2007, Matthias Kellermann wrote:
>
>> tonight I got lots of false-positive messages from Nagios. All these
>> messages came from services checked with check_by_ssh. Strange thing is
>> that SSH was running on all servers a
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nagios-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of sujith h
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 6:47 AM
> To: Nagios Users mailinglist
> Subject: [Nagios-users] check_nt
>
> Hi,
>
> I am Sujith H. I have a doubt regaurding the plugin che
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nagios-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Noel Dave
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 11:17 PM
> To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios-users Digest, Vol 15, Issue 5
> {Disarmed} {Fraud?}
>
>
Hi,
I am Sujith H. I have a doubt regaurding the plugin check_nt.
If am using check_nt to monitor the CPULOAD of a windows
machine and not specifying the warning and critical thresholds,
i.e,
./check_nt -H -v CPULOAD
What will the threshold value for the warning state and the critical
state here
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007, Matthias Kellermann wrote:
> tonight I got lots of false-positive messages from Nagios. All these
> messages came from services checked with check_by_ssh. Strange thing is
> that SSH was running on all servers and there were no problems with the
> network connectivity. All othe
Hello list,
tonight I got lots of false-positive messages from Nagios. All these
messages came from services checked with check_by_ssh. Strange thing is
that SSH was running on all servers and there were no problems with the
network connectivity. All other services on these servers had no errors.
15 matches
Mail list logo