On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, Frost, Mark {PBG} wrote:
> Hello. We've been noticing that our Nagios host (Red Hat ES 3 release
> 3) has been sending out quite a lot of IPv6 DNS requests (I guess those
> are "" record requests on port 53). As our box is not configured to
> do IPv6, this was a puzzleme
Hello all
The anser is NO The Simatic haven't snmp. The Simatic use 3964R
protocol.
:)
Andreas
Am Mittwoch, den 19.09.2007, 09:47 -0400 schrieb Wolfe, Robert:
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:43:47 +0200
> Andreas Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello all.
> >
> > The Company Siemens w
Hello. We've been noticing that our Nagios host (Red Hat ES 3 release
3) has been sending out quite a lot of IPv6 DNS requests (I guess those
are "" record requests on port 53). As our box is not configured to
do IPv6, this was a puzzlement. At first I assumed it was some weird
resolver libr
On Tuesday 18 September 2007, Marc Powell wrote:
> I presumed that you already had basic authentication set up. If you do,
> it shouldn't ask for one at all. The user should already be
> authenticated to view host/service status information. Apache just
> checks to see if the authenticated user is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Folks,
Yesterday the vmware server where nagios runs needed to get rebootet, so
we rebootet the vm in which nagios runs, as well.
No changes were made to the vmware server or the vm.
But after the reboot nagios can only eighter execute active c
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nagios-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Cole
> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 6:55 PM
> To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Nagios-users] email alerts failing
>
> I've ben chasing an email issue for a
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nagios-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Antonio Pereira
> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 8:59 AM
> To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Nagios-users] Email Notification
>
> Hello,
>
> Commands
> # 'notify
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nagios-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 10:10 AM
> To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Nagios-users] Hello all. A question/quandary for you all
>
>
> Can
Can anyone shed some light on the possible reasons that Nagios sends
notifications as I expect it to for a host down event but not for a service
check
event. When a service goes warning or critical the only group that seems to get
a notification is 'admins'.
Here's the relevant configuration e
Thanks Russell, this worked like a champ. For anyone interested I made a
slight modification to the end of the file to fix the hyperlinks that
come out if the service name includes a space. For example:
perl -pi -e 's|service=mailq size|service=mailq%20size|g' $tmpfile
perl -pi -e 's|service=HTT
Hello,
I have installed sendmail and it seems to work. When I do the following
in a
command line
sendmail -bv [EMAIL PROTECTED] I get this result
[EMAIL PROTECTED] deliverable: mailer esmtp, host duocom.ca., user
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have added sendmail to startup every time it boots.
In Nagios
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:43:47 +0200
Andreas Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> The Company Siemens will install a Simatic for Control in our new Data
> Center.
>
> The Monitor System for Simatic is WinCC.
>
> Has anybody got a plugin for check the state from the Simatic or a
> plug
Andreas, does it has a SNMP agent built in ? If yes you could get
informations through SNMP.
_
Dario B. BestettiOpServices
R. Luciana de Abreu, 471 - Sala 403
Porto Alegre, R
Hello all.
The Company Siemens will install a Simatic for Control in our new Data
Center.
The Monitor System for Simatic is WinCC.
Has anybody got a plugin for check the state from the Simatic or a
plugin for check the Simatic via WinCC?
Or a better idea to check the state?
Thanks for your Help
Marc Powell wrote:
> If this is the only service on the host a pending->OK transition gives
> the host a 'host assumed to be up' designation. The host isn't actually
> checked. Given the limited information I'd have to say that the service
> did flap at some point _or_ you have aggressive host chec
> -Original Message-
> From: Hari Sekhon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 3:13 AM
> To: Marc Powell
> Cc: Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] dont check service when host down
>
> Marc Powell wrote:
> > Hosts are only checked wh
I am wanting to collect alerts from IBM BladeCenters via snmp,
which generates a line of output for each entry in the event log.
I am looking for idea's about how to display the output via
the Nagios front end, I would like to discard any messages that
are of type "INFO", and just keep warnings and
Hello,
I have configured a check log plugin for nagios to check if my log
files check with some patterns. This plugin check the new lines from its
last run and if the pattern check it returns a CRITICAL (or WARNING)
state.
The problem I have with this is that every time a CRITICAL
Marc Powell wrote:
> Hosts are only checked when a service
> on that host changes state. Service goes critical, host is checked.
> Service recovers, host is checked. At no time in between is the host
> checked.
Oh, ok, this seems a little contrary to logic but perhaps I just think
in a strange wa
Marc Powell wrote:
> check returns non-OK, the service is immediately put into a hard state
> and no further retries are attempted. Nagios would then fall back to the
> normal_check_interval for the service check. Beyond the fact that
> services on down hosts are still checked, your scenario WRT
>
Hari Sekhon wrote:
> Andreas Ericsson wrote:
>
>>> Could we make this a feature request?
>> I think you just did, and I think I just shot it down for nagios 2.x.
>>
> To be fair, I wasn't asking for this for Nagios 2.x. Nagios 3.x is the
> development branch, is it not?
>
> Also I still think it
21 matches
Mail list logo
