Hugo van der Kooij [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 1: sticky acknowledgement
>
> > This is not the correct behavior according to page 7 of the nagios-3.pdf
> > document,
> >
> >"Acknowledgement comments that are marked as non-persistent are
> now
> > only deleted when the acknowledgement is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Paul wrote:
> Hello Nagios-Users,
>
> I have nagios 3.0.4 in Solaris 10. When acknowledge a host that is down
> (with a sticky acknowledgement, and then restart the nagios daemon with a
> kill -HUP, it deletes the acknowledgement.
1: sticky ack
> Don't remember. I'd have to look at the source but you can do that too.
yes, I will if none of the designers recall off the top of their head
--
"I destroy my enemies when I make them my friends"
- Abraham Lincoln
--
Hi all,
I have been running a perl plugin, check_logs.pl, on a RHEL server for several
months (no changes to my knowledge). But, this week the plugin is having
trouble. When it runs, an 'uninitialized value' warning is produced. Below is
the shell output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] plugins]# ./chec
Hello Nagios-Users,
I have nagios 3.0.4 in Solaris 10. When acknowledge a host that is down
(with a sticky acknowledgement, and then restart the nagios daemon with a
kill -HUP, it deletes the acknowledgement.
This is not the correct behavior according to page 7 of the nagios-3.pdf
document,
"
On Nov 12, 2008, at 4:28 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
> Here's a question : by what means does check_disk do it's checking?
> I guess it's using system calls? Which ones? I can look into those
> calls to see if there is a cleaner way around this than writing a
> wrapper script.
Don't remember. I'd ha
> I guess that my expectation is that automounter would wait
> about 10 minutes before unmounting.
I'm not sure why this should matter though. It's job is to mount when
needed, and unmount when not needed.
> I guess that my expectation is that automounter would wait about 10
> minutes before un
On Nov 12, 2008, at 3:57 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
>> Unless the automounter is unmounting it in the
>> time between checks,
>
> Why wouldn't it? That's it's job - to unmount stuff that is not
> needed anymore.
I guess that my expectation is that automounter would wait about 10
minutes before u
> A more likely, and elegant reason is that you have multiple nagios
> daemons running at the same time, one with the current config and one
> with a prior config that was set to check '/'.
Nope, doesn't appear to be
> Unless the automounter is unmounting it in the
> time between checks,
Why wou
On Nov 12, 2008, at 3:06 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
>> Please expand on this. What specifically is flipping back and forth?
>> What is the service output when this is happening? flip-flop behavior
>> is an indicator of accidentally having multiple nagios daemons
>> running
>> at the same time.
>
> R
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kaplan, Andrew H. wrote:
> If I was to go the CentOS route, would the Quick Install procedure available
> for
> Fedora also work for version 5.2 64-bit of CentOS?
I am not familiar with that. But with Centos it is like:
- Install Centos
- Add rpmf
> Right now the screen just refreshed and it's reporting correctly in
> the web GUI :
>
> DISK OK - free space: /opt/corp/projects/BCM_CC 64697 MB (73% inode=99%):
There, one more refresh and :
DISK OK - free space: / 63202 MB (91% inode=94%):
--
"I destroy my enemies when I make them m
> Please expand on this. What specifically is flipping back and forth?
> What is the service output when this is happening? flip-flop behavior
> is an indicator of accidentally having multiple nagios daemons running
> at the same time.
Right now the screen just refreshed and it's reporting correct
-Original Message-
From: Kaplan, Andrew H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 3:54 PM
To: Nagios Users Mailinglist
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios 3.0.5 on Fedora Core 9
Hi Hugo --
If I was to go the CentOS route, would the Quick Install procedure
available
>> I will be implementing Nagios 3.0.5 on a new server, and the operating
>> system in question will be the Fedora Core 9 release.
>>
>> Are there any issues that I should be aware of prior to the installation
>> of Nagios, via yum, onto the server? Thanks.
The Nagios version in FC9 is pretty old.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan McKay wrote:
>> Aha, but maybe this is it! Above was with the automounter running. I
>> turned it off and checked again :
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] linux]# ls -ald /opt/corp/projects/
>> drwxr-x--- 2 root root 4096 2008-07-14 04:28 /opt/corp/proje
On Nov 12, 2008, at 2:39 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
>> Aha, but maybe this is it! Above was with the automounter
>> running. I
>> turned it off and checked again :
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] linux]# ls -ald /opt/corp/projects/
>> drwxr-x--- 2 root root 4096 2008-07-14 04:28 /opt/corp/projects/
>>
>>
Hi Hugo --
If I was to go the CentOS route, would the Quick Install procedure available for
Fedora also work for version 5.2 64-bit of CentOS?
-Original Message-
From: Hugo van der Kooij [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 3:41 PM
To: Nagios Users Mailinglist
Su
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
dale sykora wrote:
> Nagios seems to be a good client monitor system. I was wondering if
> anyone also uses it as a client management system? By management, I
> mean running update scripts and other software on various Linux
> clients.
You mi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kaplan, Andrew H. wrote:
> I will be implementing Nagios 3.0.5 on a new server, and the operating
> system in question will be the Fedora Core 9 release.
>
> Are there any issues that I should be aware of prior to the installation
> of Nagios, via yu
> Aha, but maybe this is it! Above was with the automounter running. I
> turned it off and checked again :
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] linux]# ls -ald /opt/corp/projects/
> drwxr-x--- 2 root root 4096 2008-07-14 04:28 /opt/corp/projects/
>
> So I chmodded it 0755 then turned it back on.
Nope, in the w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Ericsson wrote:
> Richard Savage wrote:
>> I think you might have misunderstood. Im not interested in what actions
>> are performed on the actual box, as they cant log into that, im
>> interested in what actions are performed within the Nagios
OK, I checked the perms and they seem fine.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] nagios]$ ls -ald /opt/corp/projects/BCM_CC
drwxrwxrwx 8 otheruser othergroup 1024 2008-10-31 13:52
/opt/corp/projects/BCM_CC
Note that "otheruser" is not nagios. othergroup is one that nagios is
not a member of.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] nag
On 12-Nov-2008, at 14:09 , dale sykora wrote:
Hello,
Nagios seems to be a good client monitor system. I was wondering if
anyone also uses it as a client management system? By management, I
mean running update scripts and other software on various Linux
clients. For instance, I'd like to be
On Nov 12, 2008, at 1:24 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
> Hey folks,
Hey =) Welcome.
> I'm basically calling check_disk with -w -c and -p options. e.g.
>
> check_disk -w 20 -c 10 -p /path/to/autofs/mountpoint/disk1
> check_disk -w 20 -c 10 -p /path/to/autofs/mountpoint/disk2
>
> I've also tried adding
-Original Message-
From: dale sykora [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 2:10 PM
To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Nagios-users] Nagios for client management?
Hello,
Nagios seems to be a good client monitor system. I was wondering if
anyone al
Hey folks,
First, thanks for such a great product. Totally loving Nagios! At
first I found the config really intimidating but after maybe 20 or 30
minutes I had a few hosts banged in and it was all downhill from
there. It's amazingly easy now, I find!
But I'm having the following problem. I
Hello,
Nagios seems to be a good client monitor system. I was wondering if
anyone also uses it as a client management system? By management, I
mean running update scripts and other software on various Linux
clients. For instance, I'd like to be able to tell clients to update a
perl module
I've been running Nagios 3.0.5 on Fedora 9 for a while and runs well.
Make sure you got apache and your compilers, download the Nagios and
Nagios plugins tars and follow the quick install guide for fedora in the
manual.
From: Kaplan, Andrew H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, Nov
Did you search the applicable mailing list archives? I think that would
be a pretty good indicator.
From: Kaplan, Andrew H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 9:43 AM
To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Nagios-users] Nag
Hi there -
I will be implementing Nagios 3.0.5 on a new server, and the operating system in
question will be the Fedora Core 9 release.
Are there any issues that I should be aware of prior to the installation of
Nagios, via yum, onto the server? Thanks.
The information transmitted in this e
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Ericsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 9:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: nagios-user Mailinglist
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Email Notifications
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Please help!
> I have set up eSMTP as relay.The tes
On Nov 12, 2008, at 9:03 AM, Kenneth Holter wrote:
> I think I found one of the causes for the excessive notifacations -
> the notification_interval was set to 0. For almost all our services
> we have a high number (such as 1440), but this current value of zero
> must have made it's way int
I think I found one of the causes for the excessive notifacations - the
notification_interval was set to 0. For almost all our services we have a
high number (such as 1440), but this current value of zero must have made
it's way into the code somehow. This is my current definition:
define service
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Please help!
> I have set up eSMTP as relay.The test from the command line is as follows:
> echo "test" | /usr/bin/esmtp -C ~/esmtp [EMAIL PROTECTED] -f [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] is an outside email address i am sending to from an inside
> email address on o
Please help!
I have set up eSMTP as relay.The test from the command line is as follows: echo
"test" | /usr/bin/esmtp -C ~/esmtp [EMAIL PROTECTED] -f [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is an outside email address i am sending to from an inside
email address on our email server. Do i need to speci
On Nov 12, 2008, at 2:43 AM, Kenneth Holter wrote:
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> The "is_volatile" options is actually already set to "0". :/
That's interesting. That's about the only option that would cause the
behavior you are reporting that I can think of. Are you using event
handlers fo
Richard Savage wrote:
> I think you might have misunderstood. Im not interested in what actions
> are performed on the actual box, as they cant log into that, im
> interested in what actions are performed within the Nagios program.
>
Following your apache log will tell you who visited which pa
I think you might have misunderstood. Im not interested in what actions
are performed on the actual box, as they cant log into that, im
interested in what actions are performed within the Nagios program.
Rich
NewNet plc: Company Registration 03128506
Assaf Flatto wrote:
> This is more of a
This is more of a OS security and administration issue , and not a nagios issue.
try using sudo for that .
On Wednesday 12 November 2008 11:05:01 Richard Savage wrote:
> Hi
>
> Im running nagios 3.0.4 on FreeBSD 7.0
>
> I have it set up so that all users to the system have an individual user
> na
Hi
Im running nagios 3.0.4 on FreeBSD 7.0
I have it set up so that all users to the system have an individual user
name to access nagios. What i would like to be able to do to be able to
log all the actions that the users perform and to be able to see which
user performed which action?
A bit
Fellow nagios users,
I wonder how you would check several Citrix services. Like SMA, IMA,
Print Manager, WWW Publishing, licenses, etc. with nagios/nrpe? Port
checks? Are there any SNMP checks possible? I've seen some Citrix checks
on nagiosexchange.org, but they handle the checks mentioned abo
> I have a couple of different versions of nagios running on
> different contracts and have no issues. On one contract I have installed
> nagios version 3.0.3 running on suse 11. Has anyone had any issues with
> this version with the host alert check. Basically all my service checks
Hi There
I have a couple of different versions of nagios running on
different contracts and have no issues. On one contract I have installed
nagios version 3.0.3 running on suse 11. Has anyone had any issues with this
version with the host alert check. Basically all my service checks a
Thanks for your reply.
The "is_volatile" options is actually already set to "0". :/
I think it would be correct to sum up what I'm in need of like this:
Whenever there is a transition from one hard error state to another hard
error state, or when there has been a recovery from such an error, I'd
Seth Simmons wrote:
> I applied the patch and it worked.
> I selected a host and told it to disable checks for all services and the
> host and this time it did it.
>
Goodie. Thanks :)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Ericsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 11
46 matches
Mail list logo
