> I amto know How is possible to have sound for alert in nagios
Please check the list archives. This has been discussed many times.
Ian
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tel
On Jan 12, 2009, at 7:15 PM, Kaplan, Andrew H. wrote:
> Hi there --
>
> We currently have several Nagios 2.6, and will eventually deploy
> version 3.0.6 servers running on our network. Currently diskspace
> availability is shown in kilobytes, but I would prefer to have it
> displayed in meg
The disk space units have nothing to do with Nagios, but with the output of
the particular plugin you are using. The plugin 'check_disk', which comes
with the Nagios Plugins package, by default displays data in megabytes, but
you change the units with the proper argument. It appears that plugin o
Hi there --
We currently have several Nagios 2.6, and will eventually deploy version 3.0.6
servers running on our network.
Currently diskspace availability is shown in kilobytes, but I would prefer to
have it displayed in megabytes.
Is it possible to configure either versions of Nagios to have t
Hi James,
Good news. I followed your advice and read some more about the definitions.
But the thing that really helped was twofold: One was there was no reference
to a global service template. The other thing was adding the contact for the
service definition. There's a lot to this thing!
M
The problem was same host dependencies.
In my first config I setup Check NRPE to have the same services on the box
be dependent on it by declaring them again below. This worked on a nagios
2.x series just fine, but 3.x has a better way to declare it.
Nagios 2.x version -
define servicedependenc
On Jan 12, 2009, at 11:15 AM, ChrisSerafin wrote:
> I have Nagios 3..0.1 running on Ubuntu 8.04 and would like to change
> the
> 'from' field when receiving emails. Currently I get one email from
> 'nag...@ubuntu-nagios' which is not a real email address at all. I
> would
> like to use 'supp.
You'll need to edit the command definition of 'notify-by-email', etc. The
default mail program used by Nagios, /bin/mail, does not allow one to set a
from address, nor do I believe there is an option to do so in a .mailrc
file, either.
In that case, you'd want to use sendmail, something like:
/u
This probably means the ./configure step failed. Take a look at config.log.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Sergio Ariel wrote:
> I'm triying to install NRPE but I have a big problem.
> All documents say that I must do next:
>
> tar xzf nrpe-2.8.tar.gz
> cd nrpe-2.8
> ./configure
> make all
>
I'm triying to install NRPE but I have a big problem.
All documents say that I must do next:
tar xzf nrpe-2.8.tar.gz
cd nrpe-2.8
./configure
make all
make install-plugin
make install-daemon
make install-daemon-config
But when I try to run any make command I receive this error:
make: *** No rule t
Grant, you've got me really confused now. For starters, I would strongly
encourage you to go back and read the documentation on object defitions.
It may be that by default notifications are enabled and that notification
options are also set to something as default.
With that said, since it appear
I have Nagios 3..0.1 running on Ubuntu 8.04 and would like to change the
'from' field when receiving emails. Currently I get one email from
'nag...@ubuntu-nagios' which is not a real email address at all. I would
like to use 'supp...@xyz.com' so that clients can respond to our support
team with
James,
I thought I was trying to make this config as simple as possible. I'm only
monitoring five UNIX boxes right now. Hopefully going to expand that soon with
Nagios :->
The hosts I'm monitoring didn't have any notification options, but they do now.
All six. This is what I have for the
Also, do you have any escalations or service dependencies that could be
blocking the notification?
James Moseley
James
Moseley/BTV/PEG
All,
is there any project to provide command line interface for Nagios.
I understand cnagios already exists but it is not enough. Cnagios does
not provide a way to perform checks on command line interface. Please
advise on this. Thanks
--
Shadhin Rahman
619 Watson Hall
Columbia Univers
Service dependencies.
I commented them out and everything works fine. They do not get flagged as
wrong and worked fine in the 2.x series, so I need to make some changes.
Thanks for help! I should have went that route earlier but the behavior
was so odd with some hosts OK and others not with the
Grant Lowe wrote:
>Hi James,
>
>One question/problem with this. I'm not getting any pages or email on
when services are showing up as critical in the nagios.log. For example:>
>
>[1231773440] SERVICE ALERT: blarney;Check Remote Zombie
Processes;CRITICAL;SOFT;1;PROCS CRITICAL: 13 processes w
Marc Powell wrote:
>It means "don't apply the service to this host if it's in one of the
>named hostgroups." It's not documented quite like the OP's use but I
>expect it will work.
>
>See 'Excluding Hosts' at
http://nagios.sourceforge.net/docs/3_0/objecttricks.html
Good, I learned somethi
I checked the object defintion documentation before replying and didn't
find any such reference that you could exclude hosts out of host or service
group definitions by using a 'bang' symbol. I thought a bang (!) was used
only to separate arguments in check_commands.
Even if this feature is legit
On Jan 12, 2009, at 9:26 AM, jmose...@corp.xanadoo.com wrote:
> First, what's with the '!' preceding many of your hosts names?
It means "don't apply the service to this host if it's in one of the
named hostgroups." It's not documented quite like the OP's use but I
expect it will work.
See '
Hi James,
One question/problem with this. I'm not getting any pages or email on when
services are showing up as critical in the nagios.log. For example:
[1231773440] SERVICE ALERT: blarney;Check Remote Zombie
Processes;CRITICAL;SOFT;1;PROCS CRITICAL: 13 processes with STATE = Z
[1231773500] S
Perhaps I should have mentioned that I could not find
the example you referred to, which is why I asked for the
exact link...
But thanks anyway
cheers
Alessandro
Marc Powell ha scritto:
> On Jan 12, 2009, at 9:14 AM, Alessandro Usai wrote:
>
>> Hi Marc
>>
>> Could you send me the exact link in
On Jan 12, 2009, at 9:14 AM, Alessandro Usai wrote:
> Hi Marc
>
> Could you send me the exact link in case?
No. It's not difficult to find browsing the index, through Google or
simply using grep on your local copy of the docs. Looking for it
yourself will do you far more good than me just gi
The ! is to remove servers that have been included already in the line above
in the hostgroup_name, that way I do not need to spell them all out
individually or create different groups if you have one server that doesn't
fit with everything. Basically I do not want to monitor Check CPU Load on
ev
First, what's with the '!' preceding many of your hosts names? Second, in
your service and service dependency configs, why are you defining both
hosts and hostgroups? For example:
define service{
hostgroup_nameNmw_Servers,Wi_Servers
host_name
!Nmw_104_010_Finearts_Dataserver
Shai, look in the mailing list archives - as late as yesterday, there is a
thread that already covers your exact scenario.
James Moseley
Shai
Hi Marc
Could you send me the exact link in case?
Thanks again
cheers
Alessandro
Marc Powell ha scritto:
> On Jan 12, 2009, at 4:40 AM, Alessandro Usai wrote:
>
>> firewall: is it possible instead to just trigger (email)
>> an alarm when the information is found to be stale?
>
> Yes, the Exa
ping
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Shai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have two different user groups.
> I have a service which is currently sending both WARNING and CRITICAL
> notifications to both.
> I would like WARNING and CRITICAL to be sent to group A and CRITICAL only
> to group B.
>
> How can I ac
The operation I am employing is Check CPU Load but the symptoms were the
same as Michiel's check ping.
Hopefully all the information is there now.
Thanks!
Rob Yeo
# Finearts Nagios 2 Server
define host{
host_nameDgh_000_012_FairUse
aliasFinearts Nagios 2 Server
On Jan 12, 2009, at 5:44 AM, alex alex wrote:
> Notification: FLAPPINGSTOP
> Host: host1
> State: UP
> Or for a service
> Notification Type: FLAPPINGSTOP
>
> Service: is_alive
> Host: host1
> Is it the right behaviour (to put flapping instead up/down if the
> flapping is enabled) ?
Yes, if the
On Jan 12, 2009, at 4:40 AM, Alessandro Usai wrote:
> firewall: is it possible instead to just trigger (email)
> an alarm when the information is found to be stale?
Yes, the Example given in the documentation is exactly this solution...
--
Marc
-
Hi again,
Yes, there is another template named generic-contact but it's identical to
the generic (excepting the name).
But here's a good news: I have some notifications (finnaly, it seems that
the notification works). And the bad news is that I get only emails like:
"
Return-Path:
Received: from
Hi all,
Reading through the docs about passive checks and the
possible actions in case of stale information, it seems
it is possible to turn on a "freshness" functionality
so that after a certain timeout active checks are used
instead.
In my case this may not necessarily be feasible
as the nodes
33 matches
Mail list logo
