My /var/log/messages shows hundreds of entries of this sort:
Feb 6 23:33:00 star256 xinetd[15109]: START: nrpe pid=17610
from=:::11.0.0.100
Feb 6 23:33:01 star256 xinetd[15109]: EXIT: nrpe status=0 pid=17610
duration=1(sec)
Are they just indicative of "normal" nrpe operations? If so, how ca
On Feb 6, 2009, at 4:06 PM, Jason Marshall wrote:
> Hi all, I've been scratching my head on this one for a couple days.
>
> I have a service defined that can only run once an hour. If it runs
> much
> more often than that, the check program (which I didn't write) often
> steps
> on its own f
Hi all, I've been scratching my head on this one for a couple days.
I have a service defined that can only run once an hour. If it runs much
more often than that, the check program (which I didn't write) often steps
on its own feet and returns a critical failure. The service runs via NRPE
if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Max schrieb:
>
>> Same thing on my side. ~6000 Services, don't know exactly how many of
>> them don't support performancedata, but I have <10 seconds avg latency
>> in Nagios while running all pnp stuff on the same server.
>> Will say: I can't see
Hi Hendrik,
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Hendrik Baecker wrote:
> hm... you should know that modpnpsender was written long time ago as a
> fast shot to a nice idea.
Yes, we have been doing some code clean up as we go along.
> I thought no one will use that code outer a test environment. But
> That's a thing that an eventbroker module never should do. Think about
> what a fork() does...
Yes, I know, but without forking, our scheduling was skewing way
beyond our 5 minute interval due to thousands of checks being sent
from the Nagios server to the report server .. so what choice did I
h
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 12:49 PM, wrote:
> Just performed it...but still no luck
>
>
Another random idea. Can you open any pages at all if they reside on the new
machine? Just wondering if its an apache (etc.) issue. I had a bunch of
restrictive conditions on my /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf about who
I'm so far unable to get this one figured out. No abnormal logs on the
Nagios server but I get this on the client side:
2009-02-06 14:40:43: error:.\NSCAThread.cpp:177: <<< Failed to read header
from: xx.xxx.xxx.50:5667 0: The operation completed successfully.
Any idea what that means. I just i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Max schrieb:
> Hi Michael,
>
> I write about how the team I am on at Comcast implemented PNP to
> scale well on my blog. In a nutshell:
> * Use modpnpsender.c on your Nagios master (we added in fork() code so
> that Nagios doesn't pause while modp
Michael W. Lucas schrieb:
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 07:03:36PM +0100, Joerg Linge wrote:
>> Michael W. Lucas schrieb:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have Nagios 3.0.6 on FreeBSD 7.1/amd64, with ~1500 services on ~250
>>> hosts. I've been investigating replacing our MRTG setup with PNP.
>>> PNP runs fine, and w
Just performed it...but still no luck
Rahul Nabar
To
Hi Michael,
I write about how the team I am on at Comcast implemented PNP to
scale well on my blog. In a nutshell:
* Use modpnpsender.c on your Nagios master (we added in fork() code so
that Nagios doesn't pause while modpnpsender sends events .. will be
releasing that code as a patch soon). Ha
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 07:03:36PM +0100, Joerg Linge wrote:
> Michael W. Lucas schrieb:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I have Nagios 3.0.6 on FreeBSD 7.1/amd64, with ~1500 services on ~250
> >hosts. I've been investigating replacing our MRTG setup with PNP.
> >PNP runs fine, and we are keeping about 1450 MRTG gra
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 11:47 AM, wrote:
>
> Just completed an upgrade, from Nagios 1.x to 3.x on separate desktop
> devices however. On replacement device, I can locally load GUI using http
> specified to either localhost or actual static ip, but cannot load
> remotely as I was able to on 1.x de
I'm glad you asked that.
I install everything by the excellent wiki guide and all went well, Nagios
started and I added my Servers and Routers and they are logging well, Not
got MRTG installed as yet but I can see uptime and such, in all there are 3
Servers a Switch and 1 Network printer
Fire up
Just completed an upgrade, from Nagios 1.x to 3.x on separate desktop
devices however. On replacement device, I can locally load GUI using http
specified to either localhost or actual static ip, but cannot load
remotely as I was able to on 1.x device. 1.x was load on REL enterprise
3.x level wh
Whats problem?I have centreon 2.0 installed with nagios 3.0 on a chroot of
ubuntu server.
And it works fine.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Martyn wrote:
> I had that at first but I got past that, its just the monitoring now that
> does not work.
> 3 hours I have been at it for days now :)
>
>
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Marc Powell wrote:
>
> On Feb 6, 2009, at 11:08 AM, Rahul Nabar wrote:
>
> >>
> >> check_interval 1440 # 1440 minutes or 1 every 24 hours.
> >>
> > Unless it is important to control *when* the check runs within a 24
> > hour period?
>
> The OP didn't state any su
On Feb 6, 2009, at 11:56 AM, Rahul Nabar wrote:
> I've been adding a bunch of checks via NRPE on remote nodes and this
> got me thinking. Isn't it inefficient to keep starting check_nrpe
> calls from the monitoring host all the time?
>
> Why cannot nrpe on the remote node monitor some of the
Michael W. Lucas schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> I have Nagios 3.0.6 on FreeBSD 7.1/amd64, with ~1500 services on ~250
> hosts. I've been investigating replacing our MRTG setup with PNP.
> PNP runs fine, and we are keeping about 1450 MRTG graphs. Our plans
> call for at least doubling the number of services
On Feb 6, 2009, at 11:08 AM, Rahul Nabar wrote:
>>
>> check_interval 1440 # 1440 minutes or 1 every 24 hours.
>>
> Unless it is important to control *when* the check runs within a 24
> hour period?
The OP didn't state any such requirement.
--
Marc
--
I've been adding a bunch of checks via NRPE on remote nodes and this got me
thinking. Isn't it inefficient to keep starting check_nrpe calls from the
monitoring host all the time?
Why cannot nrpe on the remote node monitor some of the local services and
only send a message back to nagios if there
Hi,
I have Nagios 3.0.6 on FreeBSD 7.1/amd64, with ~1500 services on ~250
hosts. I've been investigating replacing our MRTG setup with PNP.
PNP runs fine, and we are keeping about 1450 MRTG graphs. Our plans
call for at least doubling the number of services and graphs.
Adding process_perfdata.p
I've wondered which method is more efficient in nagios.
using time periods + normal interval (run every 1 hr but get the time
period to 00:00-01:00)
or settting the normal interval to 1440
On 2/6/09, Rahul Nabar wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Marc Powell wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> set the co
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Marc Powell wrote:
>
>
> set the correct check_interval in the service definition.
> http://nagios.sourceforge.net/docs/3_0/objectdefinitions.html#service
>
> check_interval 1440 # 1440 minutes or 1 every 24 hours.
>
Unless it is important to control *when* the
I had that at first but I got past that, its just the monitoring now that
does not work.
3 hours I have been at it for days now :)
Cheers
_
From: Scott Ackerman [mailto:li...@scott-ackerman.com]
Sent: 06 February 2009 16:20
To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagios-us
On Feb 6, 2009, at 10:30 AM, Stewart, Tom wrote:
> I've got a question for everyone...
>
> We're using Nagios that we use for a bunch of different types of
> checks. However, we have one check that we only want to run once a
> day. What can we do in Nagios to keep this from checking through
Stewart, Tom wrote:
> I've got a question for everyone...
>
> We're using Nagios that we use for a bunch of different types of checks.
> However, we have one check that we only want to run once a day. What can we
> do in Nagios to keep this from checking throughout the day?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Tom
I tried Centreon on a CentOS 5.2 install and got as far as the web installer
portion and it couldn't find 'pear.php' and by all indications the installer
script etc. had identified the correct location. I spent probably 3 hours
and I couldn't get it to work.
Scott Ackerman
Usable Web Solutions
1
I've got a question for everyone...
We're using Nagios that we use for a bunch of different types of checks.
However, we have one check that we only want to run once a day. What can we do
in Nagios to keep this from checking throughout the day?
Thanks.
Tom
IMPORTANT: The information conta
From: Martyn [mailto:mar...@chetnet.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 11:03 AM
To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Nagios-users] Centreon
Have any of you got Centreon working with Nagios, I just followed their
Wiki guide and it has messed my up.
Going to try and delete all the
Have any of you got Centreon working with Nagios, I just followed their Wiki
guide and it has messed my up.
Going to try and delete all the .cfg files it created in my Nagios and
replace my nagios.cfg to see if I can get back up and running again
Martyn
-
Yes cheers Andy I worked it out thanks
Martyn
-Original Message-
From: Andy Shellam [mailto:andy-li...@networkmail.eu]
Sent: 05 February 2009 23:14
To: Martyn
Cc: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Ubunt- Nagios3-Centreon 2-ndo2
Martyn,
You've probably figu
Hi there.
Is this the best way to get MRTG working in Ubuntu?
http://linuxbasement.com/content/mrtg-ubuntu-server
Regards
Martyn
--
Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with Adobe(R)AIR(TM)
software.
we are using postemsg as well. but we execute it as a notification
command instead of an eventhandler.
On 2/6/09, Thomas Hager wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 16:07 +1100, Martin Barry wrote:
>> Howdy
> hi,
>
>> Is there anyone on list who has had any success with with Nagios sending
>> notificat
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 16:07 +1100, Martin Barry wrote:
> Howdy
hi,
> Is there anyone on list who has had any success with with Nagios sending
> notifications to Tivoli Enterprise Console (TEC)?
yes, we do that. IBM provides a command-line tool called postemsg to
send external notifications to the
Nicole Hähnel writes:
> I am using net-snmp on sles10sp2 and rhel5.3 servers.
> The snmpd.conf is equal on every server.
>
> # Allow Systems Management Data Engine SNMP to connect to snmpd using SMUX
> smuxpeer .1.3.6.1.4.1.674.10892.1
>
> The problem is only on older servers. The newer ones work
Seth P. Low schrieb:
> I have been using nagios for years and have just moved from 3.0.5 to 3.1.0. I
> have noticed that in 3.1.0 (regardless of what browser I am using), hitting
> F5 brings me back to the welcome page on 2 different installs. Anyone else
> seeing this? Suggestions for correctin
38 matches
Mail list logo