This is a confirmed bug in 3.2.0. We Europeans noticed this last week when
we switched from DST.
Start of thread on the problem:
http://www.mail-archive.com/nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg29695.html
There are a bunch of suggestions there on how to get your checks scheduled
sanely again wit
I guess I'm another "me too". We use Nagios 3.0.6, but I had just setup an
upgrade to 3.2.0. From what I could see, my distributed nodes had been sending
data just fine for 45 minutes or so. When I double-checked the performance
graphs just before retiring for the night I saw no data coming i
Actually, At 2003 level there is a "prevent accidental deletion" check box
on most objects.
\\Greg
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 9:48 PM, C. Bensend wrote:
>
> They're running 2003 and have begun the migration to 2008... I
> will mention the protections to them, that's good to know. Thanks!
>
> Benn
On Nov 2, 2009, at 10:03 PM, Casey Allen Shobe wrote:
You /could/ do what I did, and force service checking on all your
hosts by echoing a line for each host into nagios.cmd. See here:
http://old.nagios.org/developerinfo/externalcommands/commandinfo.php?command_id=130
The other important thin
Was your nagios interface still showing whatever the service status
was from the last time it ran the checks as though they were current?
I just joined this list over the same problem with 3.2.0. Nagios was
showing all green (got 95 services across 12 hosts), then when I went
to demo it to
I've scheduled a BoF for Wednesday Night at LISA. If you're around,
stop by.
Jonah
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpsta
On Nov 2, 2009, at 9:46 PM, Les Fenison wrote:
> Well, so far 3 of us with the same problem on the same day. I have
> to believe it is daylight savings time related.
I'm gonna go with that too. I had a sort of hunch that might be it
earlier. Gonna change the servers to UTC time zone, which
They're running 2003 and have begun the migration to 2008... I
will mention the protections to them, that's good to know. Thanks!
Benny
> What functional level are you at? In 2008 you can protect OUs in AD from
> being moved etc. It's annoyingly easy it is to accidently click/drag OUs
> in AD
Well, so far 3 of us with the same problem on the same day. I have to
believe it is daylight savings time related.
My fix is to go click on each service one by one and reschedule. Then
they start checking normally again.
I wonder if there is anyway to force an automatic reschedule of all
s
Funny you mention this; I just had the same problem.
I'm looking at my hosts and of 85 of them, 82 was last checked about
11pm Sunday and the next scheduled check is 11pm Monday (about 90 min
from now).
I also have a number of services that are not scheduled to be checked
again until 11pm. Mo
Les Fenison wrote:
> I had nagios working great. Checking 6 hosts and about 85 services.
> Then suddenly, all services on all hosts except one stopped checking.
> The next scheduled check is about 24 hours from the last check. I had
> been checking every 5 minutes.
>
> Restarting nagios did
I had nagios working great. Checking 6 hosts and about 85 services.
Then suddenly, all services on all hosts except one stopped checking.
The next scheduled check is about 24 hours from the last check. I had
been checking every 5 minutes.
Restarting nagios didn't help.I am using a gui
What functional level are you at? In 2008 you can protect OUs in AD from being
moved etc. It's annoyingly easy it is to accidently click/drag OUs in AD
You could also use nsclient++ on your domain controller and run a power shell
script to compare list of OU's
Cheers
Gareth
-Original
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Gareth Fletcher
wrote:
> As is always the case in IT now we want to extend this and insert the IP
> addresses into this table (so we can build a DNS zone with our Nagios
> hosts).
>
>
>
> Does anyone know a way I can easily grab the IP address of a given hostname?
>
Hi everyone,
I have a simple script that runs every hour and dumps the current hostnames
into a MySQL table (to reconcile with our asset database).
cat /usr/local/Nagios/var/objects.cache | grep -i host_name | cut -f 3 | sort |
uniq > $HOSTLIST
cat $HOSTLIST |while true
do read LINE || break
ec
Hi, i need use snmp to monitoring ups
i define
1.- in SERVICES_NAGIOS2.CFG
define service{
use generic-service
host_name my-ups
service_description Uptime
is_volatile 0
check_period 24x7
max_check_attempts 4
normal_check_interval 8
retry_c
The stock check_ldap may work, though you'd need to set up a separate
check for each of the objects you're concerned about.
C. Bensend wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
>I just started a new job, and my immediate task is to build a
> new Nagios system for them. I love my new job... :)
>
>They would
You can also use the ldapsearch command from your linux based nagios
server to query your active directory server. Same as below, use your
favorite scripting language to generate the check.
Lane Williams Jr. | Senior System Administrator | Cellular South
1018 Highland Colony Parkway | Suite No
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 5:56 PM, C. Bensend wrote:
>
> Hey folks,
>
> I just started a new job, and my immediate task is to build a
> new Nagios system for them. I love my new job... :)
>
> :-)
> They would like to monitor Active Directory OUs, so that Nagios
> alerts if any of a certain g
All
Is there an official patch for this? can someone please advise on this?
Thanks
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Ton Voon wrote:
>
> On 26 Oct 2009, at 12:53, Matthias Flacke wrote:
>
>
> this change is causing the wrong reschedule:
>
> http://nagios.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/nagios/nagios/
Hey folks,
I just started a new job, and my immediate task is to build a
new Nagios system for them. I love my new job... :)
They would like to monitor Active Directory OUs, so that Nagios
alerts if any of a certain group of OUs are moved/renamed/deleted.
Apparently, this happens every s
I am running the nrpe-plugin as part of xinetd. I had the same issue
till I made the following setting in /etc/xinetd.d/nrpe :
service nrpe
{
flags = REUSE
socket_type = stream
port= 5666
wait= no
user= nagio
When executing the following command :
[r...@nagios ~]# /usr/local/nagios/libexec/check_nrpe -H ip_address -c
check_asterisk_peers
I get the following output :
NRPE: Unable to read output
Somewhere Nagios does not have enough rights to question Asterisk about
the sip peers.
These are the right
I am out of the office until 11/16/2009.
I will be out of the office starting 27/10/2009 and will not return until
16/11/2009.
I will have limited access to mails. Please get in touch with my colleagues
for urgent matters Mohandas K (mohanda...@tcs.com) or Pushkar Patil
(pushkar.pa...@tcs.com)
Hi -
I am getting the following error
nrpe[6183]: [ID 813741 daemon.error] Error: Could not complete SSL
handshake. 1
This is the message from /var/adm/messages on solaris 10
I am running the following command from the server where I have installed
nagios
./check_nrpe -H 10.xxx.xxx.xx and I ge
export PERL5LIB=/usr/local/nagios/libexec/ solved the problem.
Jonas.
> > The file is already there :
> >
> > bash-3.2# locate utils.pm
> > /usr/local/nagios/libexec/utils.pm
> > /usr/src/nagios-plugins-1.4.14/contrib/packet_utils.pm
> > /usr/src/nagios-plugins-1.4.14/plugins-scripts/utils.pm
>
> I pose this question in the past but I apologize for the same question
> again. However I saw some discussion on the list about check_mk. I am
> using nrpe now to monitor remote host. Do you think move to check_mk is the
> right action to take? Architecturally it sounds appealing, although I
"Ortner, Gerald" writes:
> looks like the symlink function isn't included anymore you can use
> --only in the command definition instead e.g. --only=batteries
Yes, the symlink stuff was messy and unnecessary. I removed it
completely and replaced the functionality with the '--only' option. To
get
Thank you for this Gerald. All is ok now. :)
Ortner, Gerald a écrit :
> looks like the symlink function isn't included anymore
> you can use --only in the command definition instead
> e.g. --only=batteries
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: David B. [mailto:haazel...@gmail.com]
> Gesen
Hi,
Is it possible to exclude process(es) in check_procs plugin?
ex. I have 3 processes
aaa
aaa_monitor
tail -f aaa_monitor.log
then I monitor it in check_procs plugin
check_procs -c 2:2 -a aaa
in this case it will give me critical alert since it will detect the 3
processes, and the importan
On 10/29/2009 08:50 PM, Frost, Mark {PBG} wrote:
> You think you know an application and every once in a while you get a
> surprise...
>
> Both the reporting server and the distributed node share the same attributes
> for retention and soft states:
>
> soft_state_dependencies=0
> passive_host_che
looks like the symlink function isn't included anymore
you can use --only in the command definition instead
e.g. --only=batteries
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: David B. [mailto:haazel...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 02. November 2009 11:49
An: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Betreff:
Hi nagios list,
Like a lot of people, i'm using this lovely nagios plugin to check
openmanage (http://folk.uio.no/trondham/software/check_openmanage.html).
This one seems not to work well on Dell R410.
Did someone notice this too ?
Plugin always return the RAID data, even if i want to check somet
33 matches
Mail list logo
