On 07/13/2010 04:03 PM, C. Bensend wrote:
>
>> If I remember, that line is in the sshd.config for the auth users banner.
>> I should be able to comment it out to test it.
>>
>> Didn't think about that... I'll dial in when I get home& try it..
>
> If you're running a recent release of OpenSSH, you
> If I remember, that line is in the sshd.config for the auth users banner.
> I should be able to comment it out to test it.
>
> Didn't think about that... I'll dial in when I get home & try it..
If you're running a recent release of OpenSSH, you might be able
to use a match directive to skip th
If I remember, that line is in the sshd.config for the auth users banner. I
should be able to comment it out to test it.
Didn't think about that... I'll dial in when I get home & try it..
Thanks Benny for the info,
Steve
> Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 17:22:35 -0500
> From: be...@bennyvision.com
>
> I also tried this as well from the server , which does work
>
> ssh 172.xx.xx.xx /usr/local/nagios/libexec/check_users -w 5 -c 8
>
> Authorized users only.
>
> USERS OK - 0 users currently logged in |users=0;5;8;0
>
>
> This tells me that
> 1. ssh as Nagios works
> 2. the check_users scrip
I also tried this as well from the server , which does work
ssh 172.xx.xx.xx /usr/local/nagios/libexec/check_users -w 5 -c 8
Authorized users only.
USERS OK - 0 users currently logged in |users=0;5;8;0
This tells me that
1. ssh as Nagios works
2. the check_users script runs on the rem
yes running the check on the client works fine :
/usr/local/nagios/libexec> ./check_users -w 5 -c 8
USERS OK - 1 users currently logged in |users=1;5;8;0
I am beginning to think it has to be something really stupid...
Thanks,
Steve
> Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:52:06 -0500
> From: be...@bennyvi
> Thanks for the reply, yes I have tried it with both ip & name with the
> same results.
>
> I assume that the command line check should work as I have written it here
> correct?
>
> /usr/local/nagios/libexec> ./check_by_ssh -H 172.xx.xx.xx -C
> '/usr/local/nagios/libexec/check_users -w 5 -c 8' -l
Thanks for the reply, yes I have tried it with both ip & name with the same
results.
I assume that the command line check should work as I have written it here
correct?
/usr/local/nagios/libexec> ./check_by_ssh -H 172.xx.xx.xx -C
'/usr/local/nagios/libexec/check_users -w 5 -c 8' -l nagios -
I will be out of the office starting 13/07/2010 and will not return until
15/07/2010.
This transmission is intended for the named addressee(s) only and may contain
sensitive or protectively marked material up to RESTRICTED and should be
handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addresse
> I have tried running the check_by_ssh plugin from the command line with no
> success , specifying ports, protocol, user, etc
>
> ./check_by_ssh -H pbylinux7 -C '/usr/local/nagios/libexec/check_ssh' -2 -4
> -p 22
Have you tried using the *IP* instead of the hostname? Depending on
how you have y
Hello All,
have been banging my head against the wall trying to get check_by_ssh to work.
No matter what I try to do, I keep getting Remote command execution failed: .
I have verified that I can ssh to the remote pc from the server as both root &
the nagios user with no problem or password
Michael Friedrich writes:
> Well I've sent a patch a few months ago to nagios-devel but iirc it's
> only in CVS, not within a new beta release. An Icinga user pointed me to
> that problem.
>
> http://markmail.org/message/jsolx6j6jl74aqpj
> https://dev.icinga.org/issues/219
I caught one of
Hi,
Carl Friend wrote:
> I tried updating my (perfectly working, mind you) ndoutils from
> 1.4b7 to 1.4b9 over the weekend and was primarily rewarded with
> segfaults and other grief which has resisted investigation and
> fixes. The errors were introduced in 1.4b8 and persist into 1.4b9.
> I'
13 matches
Mail list logo
