nagios is not a protocol per se . its uses already well known protocols .
it depends on what type of check you want to capture packets
if the check is performed using snmp that filter snmp packets on wireshark
if check uses nrpe , nsca then filter the IP and the port respectively
regards .
On 6
hi!
i'm Geraldo, an undergrad student from são paulo, brazil
and i'd like to know if any of you have some experience using
wireshark to capture nagios packets
once i couldn't see any reference(supported protocols) to nagios protocol...
btw, where can i find more information on nagios protocol?
and
Hello all,
I now had some time to look what the failure is. I found:
kernel: [689026.670555] check_nt[12295]: segfault at 0 ip b75ab713 sp
bf992f3c error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b7577000+153000]
hui... what to do?
tia stefan
Am Mittwoch, 29. September 2010, 18:28:39 schrieb Stefan Fuhrmann:
>
Bit of a shot in the dark here, but I notice that in your examples from the
command line, you use -U, -w and -c. But the Nagios service you define also
adds in a -P option (port, I'm guessing). If you haven't already tried
manually
running from the command line with the -P option, it would be
On 6 October 2010 17:03, Athiqur Rahman wrote:
> etting '(null)' status information
I've no idea, that was a stuff that resolved me a problem.
Sorry =/
--
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
st
Enrico Zimol wrote:
> On 6 October 2010 15:04, Athiqur Rahman wrote:
>
>>}
>>
>> o
>> But I still get the same problem. I tried doing this check over nrpe as
>> well, but still does not work.
>>
>
> If you do:
> su - nagios
>
> and after
>
> sudo /path/to/plugin
>
> ?
>
after addin
On 6 October 2010 15:04, Athiqur Rahman wrote:
>
> }
>
>o
> But I still get the same problem. I tried doing this check over nrpe as
> well, but still does not work.
If you do:
su - nagios
and after
sudo /path/to/plugin
?
-
Enrico Zimol wrote:
> On 6 October 2010 12:39, Athiqur Rahman wrote:
>
>> The check_asteisk plugin uses sipsak, could this have anything to do
>> with this? Any comments appreciated.
>>
>
> Probably there is bettere solution than this.
> If the script needs priviledges try to add something
On 6 October 2010 12:39, Athiqur Rahman wrote:
>
> The check_asteisk plugin uses sipsak, could this have anything to do
> with this? Any comments appreciated.
Probably there is bettere solution than this.
If the script needs priviledges try to add something like this on "visudo"
nagios ALL=(ALL
Yep, it cleared up. Thanks
Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®
-Original Message-
From: Michael Friedrich
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:51:22
To:
Reply-To: Nagios Users List
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] upgrade from 3.2.2 to 3.2.3 not working?
On 2010-10-04 21:11, Tony Yaru
I am using the check_asterisk pluing that is found here
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page_id=1864
When executing this script from bash it works like a charm
[r...@watcher2 libexec]# ./check_asterisk -U sip:1...@192.168.53.10 -w 10 -c 50
SIP OK - Test Duration: 2.19 ms
I created the
On 2010-10-04 21:11, Tony Yarusso wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 15:02 -0400, Ilan Berkner wrote:
>> You mean a cron job on nagios.org for notifying users of a new
>> version?
>
> No, on your system going out to nagios.org to compare your current
> version to that available. It won't know you upgr
Hi,
I am looking for a reliable solution to achieve a partitioning of
stakeholders on Nagios.
I wish for example that the team system to give rights in a
configuration different from theirs, while having the same central
Nagios server.
My questions:
Is it possible to have two different configurat
Hello,
Thanks all for your tips ;) !
This is not possible for me to use my Asterisk server and I finally
choosen Teamtilt for Nagios. ( http://www.alarmtilt.com/nagios )
I can relay my notifications through SMS, voice call and iPhone push and
credits are not expensive !
Regards,
Bob !
L
14 matches
Mail list logo
