Re: [Nagios-users] "No Route to Host" error - ssh-key exchange issue even if plugin checks work?

2010-11-11 Thread Morris, Patrick
On 11/11/2010 11:46 AM, Jonathan Wiggins wrote: > >> 'No Route To Host' is not a nagios error message but is coming from >> your operating system. Based on that and the above information, I'd >> say that the 'Home Page' check is being told to check a different, >> invalid, host name or address t

[Nagios-users] Notifications on passive service checks

2010-11-11 Thread Hall, JC
Is it accurate that Nagios will only send 1 notification for a passive service check? IE, the notification_interval definition for a passively checked service won't instruct Nagios to re-send a notification such as with actively checked services? ---

Re: [Nagios-users] "No Route to Host" error - ssh-key exchange issue even if plugin checks work?

2010-11-11 Thread Jonathan Wiggins
On Nov 11, 2010, at 5:26 AM, Marc Powell wrote: > > On Nov 10, 2010, at 7:36 PM, Jonathan Wiggins wrote: > >> I see this in the messages files: >> >> Nov 9 00:00:00 nagiosbox nagios: CURRENT SERVICE STATE: monitorednode;Home >> Page;CRITICAL;HARD;1;No route to host >> Nov 10 00:00:00 nagios

Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios passive checks, client?

2010-11-11 Thread Greg Pangrazio
If they are just windows, i would check out check_nt and the NSClient. I use that to monitor about 20 hosts and probably 200 services behind a firewall. That requires a client software to be installed on the windows boxes though. Some people balk at that. I do go the passive route as well but t

Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios passive checks, client?

2010-11-11 Thread Rikard Dahlberg
Hello! only a couple of windows servers... (sadly ;) ) im however planning on monitor the firewall, but that is for later .. > From: pangr...@gmail.com > Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 09:59:07 -0600 > To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios passive checks, client? >

Re: [Nagios-users] Map

2010-11-11 Thread Macleod, Chris
The map is built automatically based on the parent/child relationship you have set in your host definitions. For instance if you make Switch1 the parent of Server1 and switch1 parent is local host you will have a map of Server1->Switch1=>Localhost This also means if switch1 goes down

Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios passive checks, client?

2010-11-11 Thread Greg Pangrazio
What kind of hosts are you monitoring on the remote end? Greg Pangrazio On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Rikard Dahlberg wrote: > Hello! > > I'm fairly new to nagios, and im hoping that someone of you have had a > similiar situation which i am currently facing. > The active servers i got on

[Nagios-users] Map

2010-11-11 Thread Edwin Zoeller
I have a question that I hope someone give me some guidance on. How do I view the map? What I try it still looks all jumbled together. Thanks, Ed P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail -- Ce

[Nagios-users] Nagios passive checks, client?

2010-11-11 Thread Rikard Dahlberg
Hello! I'm fairly new to nagios, and im hoping that someone of you have had a similiar situation which i am currently facing. The active servers i got on my local network is being monitored fine, with all the services i have written. BUT, how do i monitor a server BEHIND a firewall? can i filt

Re: [Nagios-users] "No Route to Host" error - ssh-key exchange issue even if plugin checks work?

2010-11-11 Thread Marc Powell
On Nov 10, 2010, at 7:36 PM, Jonathan Wiggins wrote: > I see this in the messages files: > > Nov 9 00:00:00 nagiosbox nagios: CURRENT SERVICE STATE: monitorednode;Home > Page;CRITICAL;HARD;1;No route to host > Nov 10 00:00:00 nagiosbox nagios: CURRENT HOST STATE: > monitorednode;UP;HARD;1;PI

Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios host check retry interval inconsistent

2010-11-11 Thread Andreas Ericsson
On 11/11/2010 01:13 PM, Yu Watanabe wrote: >> Not that it fails to reschedule it. Just that failing service checks always >> force a hostcheck to occur. That's by design. The change was, afair, to >> make sure Nagios doesn't reschedule the hostcheck when a forced hostcheck >> happens, and also to n

Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios host check retry interval inconsistent

2010-11-11 Thread Yu Watanabe
>Not that it fails to reschedule it. Just that failing service checks always >force a hostcheck to occur. That's by design. The change was, afair, to >make sure Nagios doesn't reschedule the hostcheck when a forced hostcheck >happens, and also to not increment the check attempt variable. Sorry m

Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios host check retry interval inconsistent

2010-11-11 Thread Andreas Ericsson
On 11/11/2010 12:21 PM, Yu Watanabe wrote: > Hello Andreas. > > Thank you for the reply. > >> Failing service checks trigger host checks. I think there was some >> patch to make forced hostchecks not count as an attempt. I might >> be mistaken though, but if you upgrade your Nagios you should see

Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios host check retry interval inconsistent

2010-11-11 Thread Yu Watanabe
Hello Andreas. Thank you for the reply. >Failing service checks trigger host checks. I think there was some >patch to make forced hostchecks not count as an attempt. I might >be mistaken though, but if you upgrade your Nagios you should see >it behave differently. So in old version there are s

Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios host check retry interval inconsistent

2010-11-11 Thread Andreas Ericsson
On 11/11/2010 11:06 AM, Yu Watanabe wrote: > Hello all. > > I would like to ask a regarding to the host check retry interval. > This is about nagios 3.0.6 , little bit old. > > I have set the interval length as 30 and the host check retry interval as > default , 1. > > However, the interval see

[Nagios-users] Nagios host check retry interval inconsistent

2010-11-11 Thread Yu Watanabe
Hello all. I would like to ask a regarding to the host check retry interval. This is about nagios 3.0.6 , little bit old. I have set the interval length as 30 and the host check retry interval as default , 1. However, the interval seems to be not always 40 which includes the reaper interval.