Yes, my servers are x64. The perl release on RHEL4 is v5.8.5, and the perl
release on RHEL5 is v5.8.8, and the perl release on RHEL6 is v5.10.1.
From: Hugo van der Kooij [mailto:hvdko...@vanderkooij.org]
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 8:47 AM
To: Nagios Users List
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] c
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Ericsson [mailto:a...@op5.se]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 4:49 AM
> To: nagios List; doc...@yahoo.com
> Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] distributed nagios ?
>
>> Any pointers to docs on how to set it up?
>>
>
> http://git.op5.org/git/?p=nagios/me
I ran a full strace of nagios daemon and children and it looks like it
was the enable_environment_macros that was causing:
[pid 20478] execve("/bin/sh", ["sh", "-c", . . . . . ] = -1 E2BIG
(Argument list too long) <0.000337>
[pid 20478] exit_group(127) = ?
I turned them off and that
On 12/14/2010 05:14 PM, Daniel Wittenberg wrote:
> Yeah, the only two I'm testing with are check_nrpe and check_tcp, and
> it's all of them on every server that start failing. Any idea what
> kind of shared resources it might be starving?
>
Not those two, no. They should be fairly well behaved,
On 14 December 2010 14:11, Marc-André Doll wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I have to monitor some JVM and I don't find plugins that fit exactly
> with what I want/imagine.
>
> I could use the check_jmx but I don't really want to install a JRE on my
> Nagios server.
>
> Currently, I'm monitoring Tomcat serve
Yeah, the only two I'm testing with are check_nrpe and check_tcp, and it's all
of them on every server that start failing. Any idea what kind of shared
resources it might be starving?
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Ericsson [mailto:a...@op5.se]
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010
On 12/14/2010 05:08 PM, Daniel Wittenberg wrote:
> I noticed something odd the other day while stressing my servers. I
> noticed that when I overload it with too many hosts/checks, that I
> start getting active check failures with the standard 127 code. But,
> if I slowly reduce the number of hos
I noticed something odd the other day while stressing my servers. I noticed
that when I overload it with too many hosts/checks, that I start getting active
check failures with the standard 127 code. But, if I slowly reduce the number
of hosts/checks, I’ll get to a point where it starts working
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:12:24 +, Bret Goodfellow wrote:
[r...@server ~]# cd /usr/lib64/nagios/plugins/
[r...@server
plugins]# ./check_logs.pl -c /etc/nagios/check_logs_linux.cfg
[r...@server plugins]#
I strongly suspect that this is a perl
issue as RHEL 6 is using a newer perl vers
Thanks Hugo. Yes, I have sent an email to the author but haven’t heard back
yet. I have also run the script by hand, the shell output is below:
[r...@server ~]# cd /usr/lib64/nagios/plugins/
[r...@server plugins]# ./check_logs.pl -c /etc/nagios/check_logs_linux.cfg
[r...@server plugins]#
It
Hi, i have a problem when i want to monitoring a Cisco device (Switch 2960).
Qhen i configured Nagios, never show the CRITICAL state, when the port /
interface is down, because always receibe a message for SNMP, that it´s Ok.
Doing a research, i see this. When i use the terminal of Linux Server th
Heya!
im currently trying to get a decent graphicsystem online to somewhat replace
our Cacti. I know nagiosgraph doesn't really do that but it does fit our needs
:)
Im trying to re-write this config file to create nice shiney graphs for my
monitored services, but so far no luck.
This is the
Hi list,
I have to monitor some JVM and I don't find plugins that fit exactly
with what I want/imagine.
I could use the check_jmx but I don't really want to install a JRE on my
Nagios server.
Currently, I'm monitoring Tomcat servers with check_jmx4perl and I'm
quite happy with it. Is it possible
Hi List
We've got a relatively big environment, where Nagios is monitoring about 100
hosts, and checking about 800 services. My question is about notifications.
I am looking for a solution that will do this for us:
1) After setting dependency between several services, the notification is sent
On 12/13/2010 09:34 PM, stan wrote:
> I have a Nagios instance that curently monitors about 70 machines. Now I
> have a addtional network coming on line that will "hide" behind a firewall
> using NAT. It seems to me that the way to deal with this is to install
> Nagios on one of the machines behind
15 matches
Mail list logo