Maybe I'm missing something but I thought that suppressing notifications for
services on the same host when the host goes down is the default behavior.
It's only when you have to suppress notifications from different hosts that you
need host/service dependencies.
Mark
-Original Message--
Quoting Assaf Flatto :
>> Any hint/advice/guidance is very welcome.
>>
>> Thank you and best regards.
>>
>> Robi
>>
> check out service dependencies
>
> http://nagios.sourceforge.net/docs/3_0/dependencies.html
>
I'm in the same boat.
This should be very simple, but I'm probably just missing some
Martin Hugo wrote:
> Hi Robi,
>
> I have never done it but I know you can make hosts/services children that
> will not report if the parent is down.
>
> Hope this puts you on the right track.
>
> Marty
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Roberto Nunnari [mailto:roberto.nunn...@supsi.ch]
> Sent
Hi Robi,
I have never done it but I know you can make hosts/services children that will
not report if the parent is down.
Hope this puts you on the right track.
Marty
-Original Message-
From: Roberto Nunnari [mailto:roberto.nunn...@supsi.ch]
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 12:47 PM
To: n
Hi all.
Some time ago, I've installed and configured nagios to monitor our IT
infrastructure.
It works very well and we're happy with it.
There's still one problem though:
When a host goes down, nagios sends notifications not only for host
down, but also for all services running on that host.
On 2011/05/26, at 08:47, Janne Leinonen wrote:
> How can I compare these results in centralized Nagios server and make an
> email notification if for example the file names differ?
If I needed to do this I'd write a wrapper plugin that accepted a list of
hosts, made calls out to checks for all
Good morning, fellow Nagios users. I love it when products work as
advertised, and I have been happily monitoring our enterprise network
with little requirements as of late for help, but recently I began
investigating 2-way alerting via SMS using the following as a guide:
http://matt.bottrell.com.
Janne Leinonen wrote:
> I use NRPE to poll information from two Windows servers running NSclient++
>
> $USER1$/check_nrpe -t 300 -H $HOSTADDRESS$ -c CheckFile2 -a path
> ...max-dir-depth=1 pattern=*.XT filter+written=lt:4d
>
> The command returns all files named *.XT newer than 4 days and these
>
Strange, as i understand the documentation, nagios is suppose to do
that. But maybe thats the fix andreas was talking about, if there is a
bug in nagios?
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 09:57 -0400, Paul M. Dubuc wrote:
> Because they HAVE been informed of the problem by earlier notifications, but
> not t
I use NRPE to poll information from two Windows servers running NSclient++
$USER1$/check_nrpe -t 300 -H $HOSTADDRESS$ -c CheckFile2 -a path
...max-dir-depth=1 pattern=*.XT filter+written=lt:4d
The command returns all files named *.XT newer than 4 days and these
file names can be seen in status
Because they HAVE been informed of the problem by earlier notifications, but
not the one notification prior to the recovery. It leaves those contacts
wondering if the problem was ever fixed.
Patrik Båt wrote:
> Why just send a recovery to someone who hasnt been informed of
> problem? :P
>
> On
Why just send a recovery to someone who hasnt been informed of
problem? :P
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 09:43 -0400, Paul M. Dubuc wrote:
> I should have mentioned that whether this works depends on who the default,
> non-escalated, contacts are for the host or service. In your case, since you
> have
I should have mentioned that whether this works depends on who the default,
non-escalated, contacts are for the host or service. In your case, since you
have last_notification set to 3, those contacts in your escalation will not
get a recovery notification that is numbered 5 or greater unless t
13 matches
Mail list logo
