On 6/29/11 12:18 PM, Stringham, Steven wrote:
> I am trying to monitor multiple volumes on a NetApp system. The
format of the command requires a
> hostname:volumename format. I want to reduce my commands/service
definitions to a minimum. My initial
> thought was to have a generic service defi
Ok - I solved it. It was an Upper/Lower case thing. my variable IN USE needed
to be $_SERVICENAVOLUME$ instead of $_SERVICEnavolume$ because it automatically
converts the variable name to uppercase.
From: Stringham, Steven [mailto:sstri...@lrlaw.com]
Sent: Wedne
I am trying to monitor multiple volumes on a NetApp system. The format of the
command requires a hostname:volumename format. I want to reduce my
commands/service definitions to a minimum. My initial thought was to have a
generic service definition, that gets more specific with a sub definition.
Frank Bulk wrote:
> I have a few existing and self-developed plugins that output details of the
> HARD state:
>
> CRITICAL: critical 1, warning 1
> Detail 1
> Detail 2
>
> What I'd like to do is to be able to be re-notified if, while in the HARD
> state, the number and/or details
I have a few existing and self-developed plugins that output details of the
HARD state:
CRITICAL: critical 1, warning 1
Detail 1
Detail 2
What I'd like to do is to be able to be re-notified if, while in the HARD
state, the number and/or details change. For example, if the
I wouldn't just restart Nagios and hope the problem goes away but try and find
out why / where the problem lies.
Have you checked by running the plugin itself as the nagios user to ensure it
works properly from the command line ?
Does the plugin exist in the location that you've configured Nag
On 29 June 2011 13:23, wrote:
> After adding the -r option it works like a charm!
>
> Now in pnp4nagios I can see both values on the same graph: bytes in and
> bytes out. I see them as two thin lines. Any way to make the lines thicker
> and change their colour?
Well done.
Yes, you can create a
radu.p...@technomatic.de schrieb:
> After adding the -r option it works like a charm!
>
> Now in pnp4nagios I can see both values on the same graph: bytes in and
> bytes out. I see them as two thin lines. Any way to make the lines thicker
> and change their colour?
it depends on the pnp4nagios tem
I am working on a pretty large distributed Nagios core deployment and have a
question regarding resources.
It appears that almost every morning @ about 7:20 am, my cpu usage goes from
about 4% to about 25-40% . It will do this for a few hours and then go back to
4%.
It appears to me that the
After adding the -r option it works like a charm!
Now in pnp4nagios I can see both values on the same graph: bytes in and
bytes out. I see them as two thin lines. Any way to make the lines thicker
and change their colour?
Von:Radu Popa/Technomatic
An: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.ne
Hi all,
Usually we get this problem after a nagios reload and not a restart. So just
stop and start nagios?
Yours faithfully,
Wilfred de Bondt
--
Systems Administrator
Stachanov Group: phone: (+31)205091010
For more information, see website web:
www.stachanov.com/
www.issuu.co
Hi i have configured nagios for monitoring Printers but i'm getting the
error as return code of 127 is out of bounds - plugin may be missing
Please help me regarding this issue.
--
All of the data generated in your IT infr
On 29 June 2011 11:45, wrote:
> Was a typo error of the community string, after putting "public" instead of
> "Public" everything looks cool.
>
> Still 1 question:
>
> If I try to query interface GigabitEthernet0/2 I get the response:
>
> GigabitEthernet0/21:DOWN, GigabitEthernet0/23:DOWN, Gigabi
On 29 June 2011 09:52, Mies, Christian wrote:
>
> Hi List,
>
> I try to monitor my Datastores by check_esx3 by Datacenter. I want to exclude
> each local_* Datastore. The following command is not working ..
>
>
>
> ./check_esx3.pl -D 10.1.82.34 -u -p -l vmfs -x local_*
>
>
>
> What am I doing w
Was a typo error of the community string, after putting "public" instead
of "Public" everything looks cool.
Still 1 question:
If I try to query interface GigabitEthernet0/2 I get the response:
GigabitEthernet0/21:DOWN, GigabitEthernet0/23:DOWN, GigabitEthernet0/24:UP
No usable data on file (40
Ok,
Here is what I got so far:
1. If I run the command: ./check_snmp_int.pl -H 192.168.2.1 -C public -2
-n GigabitEthernet0/24 -fY -kqB -g -w 60,60,100,100,10,10 -c
80,80,200,200,20,20 -d 5 , I get the following output:
GigabitEthernet0/24:UP (16.9Kbps/26.2Kbps/0.0/0.0/0
Am Dienstag, 28. Jun. 11, 23:26:18 schrieb Paul M. Dubuc:
> I don't see why. All services have to be assigned to hosts anyway. You
> can specify a comma separated list of hosts in your escalation or use
> hostgroups. I think you only need 2 additional objects to do what you
> want: A hostgroup
Hi List,
I try to monitor my Datastores by check_esx3 by Datacenter. I want to
exclude each local_* Datastore. The following command is not working ..
./check_esx3.pl -D 10.1.82.34 -u -p -l vmfs -x local_*
What am I doing wrong?
Any help will be appreciated...
Regards
Christian
i
On 06/28/2011 05:13 PM, Matthieu Kermagoret wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> First of all, sorry for the delayed response, last month was pretty
> crazy at work :-p
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
>> On 05/23/2011 11:37 AM, Matthieu Kermagoret wrote:
>> Because shipping an off
Hi,
I have an odd problem connecting to a Windows host running nsclient++
We have a server, running Nagios 3.2.0 under RedHat Fedora 12, which
connects over a VPN to another network. We are already monitoring other
devices over the VPN with no problem (phone systems, wireless access
points etc
20 matches
Mail list logo
