Hi,
no ideas? It's a quite common setup :-)
Most important thing i need to know is if i made a mistake or if its
broken (by design?) within nagios...
Danny
--
Q: Gentoo is too hard to install =http://www.cyberdelia.de
and I feel like whining. = [EMAIL PRO
stupid me :) forgot something: i'm using Nagios 2.7
--
Q: Gentoo is too hard to install =http://www.cyberdelia.de
and I feel like whining. = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A: Please see /dev/null. =
(from the gentoo installer FAQ) =
Hi,
i've the following network structure between our main location and several
other sites:
/>RouterA1<>RouterB1<\
LanA<>SwitchA XSwitchB<>LanB
\>RouterA2<>RouterB2
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Arno Lehmann wrote:
>> Hi Danny,
> I'm not Danny, but...
but i am :-)
> You've got a problem with the perl script. The embedded Perl requires
> that you follow certain rules in your script. I suupose that there's the
> problem.
Yep, clearly a problem with ePN.
You can just c
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> nagios is started in /etc/init.d/nagios with "su - nagios -c nagios", so the
> process
> inherits the environment varialbes of the root user, which executes the su
> command.
> ($HOME is /root)
Which distribution are you using? My ini
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> nagios is started in /etc/init.d/nagios with "su - nagios -c nagios", so the
> process
> inherits the environment varialbes of the root user, which executes the su
> command.
> ($HOME is /root)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# echo $HOME
/root
[
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I was writing an event-handler which does ssh to the faulty box. It does not
> work at
> all, since $HOME was /root and not /var/log. ssh aborted since it could not
> read
> /root/.ssh/known_hosts.
>
> So please change the /etc/init.d/nagios which
Hi there, and happy new year :-)
Program Running Time: 10d 21h 22m 42s
So, for almost eleven days nagios runs smoothly now, no more latency
problems. I'll try it again with EPN (but still without perlcache) now.
Danny
--
Q: Gentoo is too hard to install =http://www
On Sun, 24 Dec 2006, Joerg Linge wrote:
>> I have watched over the last hour the process grow from 124M
>> to 126M.
>>
>> I use ePN with caching. Most of my checks are SNMP requests
>> via ePN scripts (http://lanning.cc/custom_plugins/), with
>> p1.pl modified with:
>>
>> use SNMP 5.0;
>> SNM
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> I have the suspicion that our check latency might converge on 419
> seconds - but I'd rather not test it, we'd be well beyond the
> 300s-interval most of our checks are designed for.
Why do you think of exactly 419 seconds?
And btw, if our problems
Ok,
this is what i noticed on my performance issues during the last days:
- it is not triggered by any other software on the server
(nagios and apache are the only things running there)
- its not triggered by hourly, daily or weekly cronjobs
- the big service check latency goes away instantl
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
> Just curious. How will this work if you have something like 5 hosts in
> line in a parent-child relation?
>
> The fastest way would be starting from nagios and work your way to the
> downed host as the average latency on a check on a live host is mu
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> I'm running 2.6 now but I had the troubles with 2.5 initially.
> OS is a Gentoo Linux, Kernel 2.6.15.5 initially, upgrade to
> 2.6.19 today.
Same here. Latency-Problems with both 2.5 and 2.6, but on CentOS 4.4 (good
that you use gentoo, saves me the
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
> Are the CPU's 64 bit ones running in 32-bit emulation mode? For intel
> cpu's, that causes up to 60% performance loss (yes, it really is that bad).
I just can answer for my setup (which is almost identical except for i
have "only" 1700 service check
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Marcel Mitsuto Fucatu Sugano wrote:
> What kind of checks do you run? Is there any custom plugins that take
700 * "check_nt"
280 * "check_icmp"
170 * checks against Netapp Filer (Perl und C)
160 * selfmade-checks against RSA Cards
120 * check_snmp_int.pl
80 * checks against
> Do you have passive and active checks? What is the ratio between them?
> I've runned across this issue, and had to tweak with main config values
> to solve the problem.
# Active Host / Service Checks: 286 / 1609
# Passive Host / Service Checks: 3 / 7
> and Nagios being way too busy for executin
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Daniel Meyer wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Mike Holloway wrote:
>
>> In nagios.cfg, what values are you using for service_reaper_frequency
>> and sleep_time? I'm using service_reaper_frequency=5 and
>> sleep_time=1 for about 10 hosts and 200
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Robert Hajime Lanning wrote:
> My theory is that Solaris is having issues forking all the checks.
> Does anyone know if Solaris does "copy on write" for the process
> memory when forking? I use a lot of ePN checks.
my checks split up like this:
700 * "check_nt"
280 * "chec
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Mike Holloway wrote:
> In nagios.cfg, what values are you using for service_reaper_frequency
> and sleep_time? I'm using service_reaper_frequency=5 and
> sleep_time=1 for about 10 hosts and 200 services. You might need to
> adjust your service_reaper_frequency down from the
Hi everyone,
i've ran into a somewhat anoying issue with nagios. First, this is my
setup:
- Dual Xeon 2.8 HT server running an up to date CentOS 4.4, nagios 2.5
(rpm from Dag Wieers) and checking approx. 285 hosts and 1500 services
- active host checks are off
- host check is replaced by a dumm
20 matches
Mail list logo
