om my current point of view it seems to work.
If somebody could please review it? And could this be applied to the
official source?
Best regards from Dresden
Viele Grüße aus Dresden
Heiko Schlittermann
--
SCHLITTERMANN.de internet & unix support
er the docs but only found the macros
If you tested it on the command line - are you sure about the printf you
used?
printf is a shell builtin
printf is /usr/bin/printf
printf is /usr/bin/X11/printf
(Here /usr/bin/printf behaves correctly, but it's not your system ;-)
Best r
/
-
-
-} else {
-printf("I was not able to allocate enough memory.\n");
-rw = 1;
-}
close(hfpath);
} else {
printf("Could not open %s for writing!\n", fpath);
Best regards from Dr
Heiko Schlittermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Mi 21 Nov 2007 23:25:00 CET):
> Hello,
>
> the example for the nagios grapher command is about this way:
>
> define command{
> ...
> command_line .../contrib/fifo_write .../rw/ngraph.pipe
> '$H
, and I'd like to monitor such
>services like IIS.
If you want to monitor it from outside the target box, it's basically
HTTP you're about to monitor. So have a look for the check_http plugin.
Best regards from Dresden
Viele Grüße aus Dres
t;
> command[check_ping]=/usr/local/nagios/libexec/check_ping -H $ARG1$ -w $ARG2$
> -c $ARG3$ -p 5
Shouldn't it be
-H $HOSTADDRESS$ -w $ARG1$ -c $ARG2$
??
Best regards from Dresden
Viele Grüße aus Dresden
Heiko Schlittermann
--
SCHLITTERMANN.de ----
e doesn't seem to be consens about the line end (at least I saw
plugins writing a new line and other don't.
BTW: I've written a shell based traffic checker - sampling over
the period it's called again. If you're interested - just for curiosity
- drop me a note :)
Best re
Gerhard Lausser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Sa 05 Jan 2008 15:53:22 CET):
> Hi Heiko,
>
> > In case you want to enable some extended monitoring
> > (performance), you may output the performance data:
> >
> > "OK - current bw: 17Mbit/s|in:12 out:22"
>
> Are you sure about the performance data for
ror: Host check command '(null)' specified for host 'diwi/diw' is not defined
anywhere
So - please, could anybody point to my stupidity?
Thanks.
Best regards from Dresden
Viele Grüße aus Dresden
Heiko Schlittermann
--
SCHLITTERMANN.de -----
.
Any suggestion anybody?
Best regards from Dresden
Viele Grüße aus Dresden
Heiko Schlittermann
--
SCHLITTERMANN.de internet & unix support -
Heiko Schlittermann HS12-RIPE -
gnupg encrypted messages a
Wojciech Kocjan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Di 08 Apr 2008 14:34:38 CEST):
> Dnia 08-04-2008 o 14:21:08 Heiko Schlittermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> napisał(a):
>
> That one would be non-trivial, but perhaps the check command could read
> current status for the host and o
Hello Israel,
Israel Brewster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Di 08 Apr 2008 19:32:25 CEST):
> On Apr 8, 2008, at 2:50 AM, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >(using 3.0.1)
> >
> >I've a list of hosts, these hosts are not available for ping, but
>
Folkert van Heusden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Di 08 Apr 2008 23:16:55 CEST):
> > | But - my question here, why is *any* failing service a trigger of a host
> > | check? Shouldn't be the failure of *all* services this trigger?
>
> Sorry to drop-in (and maybe saying something stupid) but as far as i
> kn
Greg King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Mi 09 Apr 2008 08:13:51 CEST):
> > > Heiko Schlittermann
>
> The normal check_host_alive command is ping, but it might not work for some
> hosts like firewalls, etc. For these hosts use NMAP to scan for an open TCP
> port on the
e help
Best regards from Dresden
Viele Grüße aus Dresden
Heiko Schlittermann
--
SCHLITTERMANN.de ---- internet & unix support -
Heiko Schlittermann HS12-RIPE -
gnupg encrypted messages are welcome - key ID: 48D0359B ---
15 matches
Mail list logo
