As far as I understand :
In your example, it means that during the last 15 minutes, there was, at a
said time, 0.53 processes using the cpu to do something, or waiting to be
allowed to use the cpu. At this time, the other processes were not doing
anything, nor waiting to do something. They w
Le Jeudi 27 Avril 2006 11:29, Sandeep Narasimha Murthy a écrit :
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I have a few questions regarding Latency and parallelize checks.
> Appreciate some help in this regard..
>
>
>
> 1. Latency: The average Latency value is 70.24 Seconds for all the
> services but I believe is way too high
If you want to prevent emails about services becoming unknow for some users,
no matter what the service is, then edit the concerned contact definitions
and remove the "u" in the service_notification_options field.
If you want to prevent emails about specific services becoming unknow, no
matter
I don't know if you have a real use of the "host_alias", but if not, you could
maybe use this field to stock your customized definitions. You should also
change the notification scripts to send the $HOSTNAME$ and not the
$HOSTALIAS$ value
you would have something like :
host_alias
Le Mardi 21 Mars 2006 19:55, Marc Powell a écrit :
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nagios-users-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peder Christian Bach
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 3:59 AM
> > To: Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: [Nagios-users
Hello everyone.
I am facing problems for a few days with my Nagios server (2.0b4).
I often have more than one nagios "root" process (launched by the root
process), and sometimes have a "defunct" nagios process.
It is really anoying, as it can leads to Nagios not working any more, or, at
best,
Hello everyone,
Up to now, everyone who had an access to my nagios webpages could execute
commands. So, the cgi.cfg file had things like :
authorized_for_all_service_commands=*
I would like to add a new user who can only see the informations, but could
not execute any command. I tried the foll
If I understand well, you want your check_disk on HostA to be send to the 2
mailing lists, while all the other check_disk being only send to one of the
mailing list?
If I am true, then you could create a new service, "check_disk_A", doing
exactly the same things than the regular check_disk, but
> Yes, the port has been added to the services file, and netstat show me that
> nrpe is listening on port 5666
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Johan Corsini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: maandag 6 februari 2006 14:07
> > To: nagios-users@lists.sourcef
Hello,
Did you add the nrpe port to the list in the /etc/services file? There should
be a line with something like that :
nrpe5666/tcp
Also, did you check with a "netstat -a | grep nrpe" if the port is listening?
Johan
Le Lundi 06 Février 2006 13:53, Kannberg, Andy a écrit :
> Hi
I am not sure about it, but I think that recoveries are only send to contacts
who received the alert. So, if you only get the "Critical alerts" on your
cell phone, you should only get the "Critical -> Ok" recoveries on it, not
the "Warning -> Ok" recoveries.
Johan
Le Mercredi 18 Janvier 2006
Hello,
I might be wrong, but I think that there is no definition of "check_fw1" in
the nrpe.cfg (or in the included files) on your new server.
So, NRPE doesn't know what to do when it receives the "check_fw1" instruction.
There should be something like that :
command[c
12 matches
Mail list logo
