On Jun 24, 2008, at 12:02 PM, Cassius V. de Magalhaes wrote:
> Cassius V. de Magalhaes escreveu:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would like to monitor OpenFire on Linux by Nagios, please?
>>
>>
> Or even better, how to monitor OpenFire on Linux by Nagios, please?
I'm monitoring our OpenFire server via:
def
On May 8, 2008, at 6:49 AM, Terry wrote:
> I am sitting here racking my brain on this one. Is dividing the load
> average by the number of CPUs a smart thing to do? the 'uptime'
> command on a box does not do this. So, if I have an 8 core box
> sitting with a load average of 8, its the same as
hing similar, and if so, if that is
where the quotes are being stripped out.
--
Sandor W. Sklar, Unix Systems Administrator
Stanford University Libraries & Academic Information Resources (SULAIR)
http://library.stanford.edu
--
when i run 'ps -ef'
>
> e.g.
>
> ps -ef -->
>
> root 19761 19759 0 Dec03 ?00:00:00 dsmcad
> root 20426 1 0 Dec03 ?00:00:00 dsmc sched
>
> Ideas on how I can call this from the -C command in check_procs ?
I use this:
check_pro
d.
the fact that you got that response tells you that at least something
is bound and listening to that port number. Contrast with the output
when there is nothing bound on a port ...
$ telnet localhost 12345
Trying 127.0.0.1...
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refuse
uot;grep procname". Maybe something you can live
> with until it's fixed?
>
> Regards
> Christian
>
> Sandor W. Sklar wrote:
>> thanks for the tip, but I tried as both root and an unprivilaged
>> user, with the same result. On Solaris, it can&#
.
>
> Are you running check_procs as the nagios user? Have you tried
> running it as root?
>
> -h
>
> Hari Sekhon
>
>
>
> Sandor W. Sklar wrote:
>> This is not useful, but I reported an identical problem on Solaris
>> 8, and got no replies.
>>
&
--
> ---
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerba
x27;inetd'
# pgrep sendmail ; ./check_procs -C sendmail
270
PROCS OK: 0 processes with command name 'sendmail'
Is this a known bug, or am I doing something wrong?
Thanks,
-s-
--
Sandor W. Sklar
Unix Systems Administrator
Stanford University Libraries & Academic In
