Re: [Nagios-users] Hyperlink in Acknowledgement Comment

2010-02-12 Thread fevin Kagen
Does anyone know if this is possible? Thanks- On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 11:55 AM, fevin Kagen wrote: > I've tried all sorts of combinations, but what I have now is this: > > http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/nagios/cgi-bin/cmd.cgi?cmd_typ=&cmd_mod=2&host=&service=&stic

Re: [Nagios-users] Hyperlink in Acknowledgement Comment

2010-02-08 Thread fevin Kagen
I've tried all sorts of combinations, but what I have now is this: http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/nagios/cgi-bin/cmd.cgi?cmd_typ=&cmd_mod=2&host=&service=&sticky_ack=on&send_notification=on&persistent=on&com_data=""&btnSubmit=Commit I know it can be done via the nagios.cmd file, but since these are two s

Re: [Nagios-users] Hyperlink in Acknowledgement Comment

2010-02-08 Thread fevin Kagen
6, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Morris, Patrick wrote: > fevin Kagen wrote: > >> Hi- >> I'm using nagios in conjunction w/ OTRS. All in all, it works great. >> However, we would like to replace the simple ticket number in the >> acknowledgement comment with a hyperlin

[Nagios-users] Hyperlink in Acknowledgement Comment

2010-02-05 Thread fevin Kagen
Hi- I'm using nagios in conjunction w/ OTRS. All in all, it works great. However, we would like to replace the simple ticket number in the acknowledgement comment with a hyperlink to the actual ticket. Any ideas on how to do this? I've found the "Nagios::Acknowledge::HTTP::URL: " variable in the

Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios freshness checks randomly think check results are from 1973.

2008-08-13 Thread fevin Kagen
Problem solved! We were 100% last night and, after a little testing, I found the smoking gun... A time stamp of 1218611709 = 8/13/2008 07:15:09 loose the last number and, you guessed it, 11/11/1973 20:19:30! Thanks for the extra effort Thomas! On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 12:31 PM, fevin Kagen

Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios freshness checks randomly think check results are from 1973.

2008-08-12 Thread fevin Kagen
, Aug 12, 2008 at 2:17 AM, Thomas Guyot-Sionnest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 11/08/08 11:23 PM, Thomas Guyot-Sionnest wrote: > > On 11/08/08 04:57 PM, fevin Kagen wrote: > >> So...is a date sent in the SNMP

Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios freshness checks randomly think check results are from 1973.

2008-08-11 Thread fevin Kagen
Any idea how to troubleshoot or fix that? On 8/10/08, Brian A. Seklecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 1973 isn't 1969 -- it could be a 64bit integer overflow. > > ~BAS > > On Sun, 10 Aug 2008, fevin Kagen wrote: > >> Linux xxx.xxx.local 2.6.25.6-55.fc9.i686

Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios freshness checks randomly think check results are from 1973.

2008-08-11 Thread fevin Kagen
whole system down for a week plus. Thanks! Kevin On 8/10/08, Thomas Guyot-Sionnest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10/08/08 06:28 PM, fevin Kagen wrote: >> Thanks for the quick reply. My date is correct on both servers, b

Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios freshness checks randomly think check results are from 1973.

2008-08-10 Thread fevin Kagen
as 1 comment associated with it Active checks of the service have been disabled - only passive checks are being acceptedThis service is flapping between states OK 11-10-1973 22:01:21 1d 16h 47m 1s 1/1 " No action required: Backup Exec: Backup Job Contains No Data&qu

[Nagios-users] Nagios freshness checks randomly think check results are from 1973.

2008-08-10 Thread fevin Kagen
I'm having this exact same issue on two different Nagios servers. One running Fedora and one running Ubuntu. It is driving me crazy. An SNMP Trap is received for a backup job. It is properly translated and ultimately received by Nagios. I have a freshness check in place for the service that