Randal, Phil wrote:
The latest version now works fine on my CentOS 5.1 boxes.
Now all we need is a version which works with python 2.3 so I can check
our CentOS / RHEL 4 boxes.
Cheers,
Phil
I have a couple of RHEL 4 boxes too but since they didn't ship with yum
this didn't seem so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hari Sekhon wrote:
| Randal, Phil wrote:
| The latest version now works fine on my CentOS 5.1 boxes.
|
| Now all we need is a version which works with python 2.3 so I can check
| our CentOS / RHEL 4 boxes.
|
| Cheers,
|
| Phil
| I have a couple of
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Hari Sekhon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 May 2008 10:40
To: Randal, Phil
Cc: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Announce: Check_Yum for RedHat/CentOS
serverpackagealerts
Randal, Phil wrote
Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hari Sekhon wrote:
| Randal, Phil wrote:
| The latest version now works fine on my CentOS 5.1 boxes.
|
| Now all we need is a version which works with python 2.3 so I can check
| our CentOS / RHEL 4 boxes.
|
|
This does make a good case for adding support for CentOS 4. I don't have
any older CentOS, only RHEL so I wasn't aware that CentOS shipped with
yum for this to be useful.
Since you have made a good case, I have now updated the plugin to have
compatibility for the older python 2.3, so
Tom Brown wrote:
This does make a good case for adding support for CentOS 4. I don't
have any older CentOS, only RHEL so I wasn't aware that CentOS
shipped with yum for this to be useful.
Since you have made a good case, I have now updated the plugin to
have compatibility for the older
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hari Sekhon wrote:
| Tom Brown wrote:
| This does make a good case for adding support for CentOS 4. I don't
| have any older CentOS, only RHEL so I wasn't aware that CentOS
| shipped with yum for this to be useful.
|
| Since you have made a good case,
Did you add yum manually to RHEL 4 and if so, what implications are
there for updates then, is there any official repo for that, or only
3rd party. If 3rd party, do they support security information support
for yum? Otherwise you'd have to use --all-updates or
--warn-on-any-update and
Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
Centos 4 makes no distinction. There is at least no security plugin for
yum. But given this known limitation the plugin works well on Centos 4 here.
Hugo.
Is it that the information is not available on CentOS 4 or that the
yum-security plugin is just not
Tom Brown wrote:
Did you add yum manually to RHEL 4 and if so, what implications are
there for updates then, is there any official repo for that, or only
3rd party. If 3rd party, do they support security information support
for yum? Otherwise you'd have to use --all-updates or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hari Sekhon wrote:
| Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
| Centos 4 makes no distinction. There is at least no security plugin for
| yum. But given this known limitation the plugin works well on Centos
4 here.
|
| Hugo.
|
| Is it that the information is not
Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
Hari Sekhon wrote:
| Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
| Centos 4 makes no distinction. There is at least no security plugin for
| yum. But given this known limitation the plugin works well on Centos
4 here.
|
| Hugo.
|
| Is it that the information is not available on
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Randal,
Phil
Sent: 30 April 2008 15:30
To: Hari Sekhon; Nagios Users mailinglist
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Announce: Check_Yum for RedHat/CentOS
serverpackagealerts
# ./check_yum -vvv
setting plugin timeout to 30 seconds
running command: /usr/bin/yum
Sekhon; Nagios Users mailinglist
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Announce: Check_Yum for RedHat/CentOS
serverpackagealerts
# ./check_yum -vvv
setting plugin timeout to 30 seconds
running command: /usr/bin/yum --security check-update
Returncode: '0'
Output: 'Loading security plugin
Loading
14 matches
Mail list logo
