Hi!
The other day, we got our beefier machine. I had hoped my latency
problems (ever increasing check latencies) would go away or at
least turn irrelevant with that. They didn't.
More precisely: we have migrated to a four-core Opteron 2.2GHz
with 2GBs of RAM and a quite fast I/O Subsystem.
We h
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nagios-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tobias Klausmann
> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 9:12 AM
> To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Nagios-users] Completely stumped
>
> Hi!
>
Replying to myself...
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nagios-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Powell
> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 9:30 AM
> To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Nagios-users]
Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The other day, we got our beefier machine. I had hoped my latency
> problems (ever increasing check latencies) would go away or at
> least turn irrelevant with that. They didn't.
>
> More precisely: we have migrated to a four-core Opteron 2.2GHz
> with 2GBs of RA
Hi!
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
> > The *only* thing I've left to try is removing the multiuser patch
> > we talked about at the end of last year. If that does it, at
> > least I have an idea *where* in the code my problem lies. I'll
> > try that route tonight.
> >
>
> Which pa
Hi!
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> As far as I can tell, backdating from my own packages (2.6 with
> said patch) to dsitro packages (Gentoo, Nagios v2.5) fixed the
> problem. The new machine has run close to 12 hours without even
> remotely acting up. I've now updated to 2.6, stil
Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
>>> The *only* thing I've left to try is removing the multiuser patch
>>> we talked about at the end of last year. If that does it, at
>>> least I have an idea *where* in the code my problem lies. I'll
>>> try that rou
Hi!
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
> Was this by any chance coupled with a big fat spike of memory usage
> on the Nagios server? I assume you do monitor memory usage, right?
I've checked it every now and then and found nothing unusal.
While switching around 2.5/2.6 with and without
Tobias Klausmann wrote:
>
> On Fri, 19 Jan 2007, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
>> All in all, I'd advice against using this patch, or at least try without it
>> first thing you do in case you run into problems.
>
> Hm. I was afraid you'd say that. You think it's wortwhile trying
> to "rescue" the patch
