w.techadre.com
> From: mar...@chetnet.co.uk
> To: subscript...@kkeane.com
> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 13:39:18 +0100
> CC: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Critical Memory Alert
>
> Oops yes it should
>
> check_nt_memuse!80!90
sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Critical Memory Alert
>
> Shouldn't there be numeric values instead of ARG1 and ARG2? I suspect that
> these non-numeric values both translate to 0, so all memory use would show
> up as critical.
>
> Martyn wrote:
>
>>
Oops yes it should
check_nt_memuse!80!90
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Keane [mailto:subscript...@kkeane.com]
Sent: 09 July 2009 13:28
Cc: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Critical Memory Alert
Shouldn't there be numeric values instead of ARG1 and
Shouldn't there be numeric values instead of ARG1 and ARG2? I suspect
that these non-numeric values both translate to 0, so all memory use
would show up as critical.
Martyn wrote:
>
> Hi All, I'm monitoring a windows server and Nagios is alerting the
> memory usage as critical, below is what Na
Hi All, I'm monitoring a windows server and Nagios is alerting the memory
usage as critical, below is what Nagios is showing.
CRITICAL 09-07-2009 12:42:261d 2h 48m 23s 3/3 Memory usage:
total:5859.57 Mb - used: 305.44 Mb (5%) - free: 5554.13 Mb (95%)
And this is the configuration I hav
