On 11/5/10 4:00 PM, RT wrote:
>
> For Host A, I'd like for all other notifications on Host A to be
> disabled when SSH on Host A is critical. I would like to have the same
> behavior apply for Hosts B-Z, each dependent on their own
> locally-running SSH.
Did you mean that you want to disable all
Using: Nagios 3.2.2.
I have a number of hosts (actually hundreds), each running a few services as
well as SSH.
For Host A, I'd like for all other notifications on Host A to be disabled
when SSH on Host A is critical. I would like to have the same behavior apply
for Hosts B-Z, each dependent on th
Marc Powell wrote:
> Yes, they are very similar... hostdependencies give you more
> flexibility about when it's valid and under what conditions though.
> Like you, I'm hard-pressed to come up with an example of when it's
> actually interesting... I guess the best example I can think of based
On Jun 1, 2009, at 2:24 PM, Andrew Davis wrote:
> Double-checking the docs I think I just realized this...
>
> If I understand this right, the "parents" option is used for Nagios
> itself (prehaps better re-worded as "internally") to define the
> network topology for the core host check. If t
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Max Hetrick wrote:
>
> Host dependencies aren't to be confused with parent/child relationships.
> Parent/child relationships are what actually define the network topology.
>
> Host dependencies are just for defining a dependency from host "A" to
> from host "B" and
Andrew Davis wrote:
> Double-checking the docs I think I just realized this...
>
> If I understand this right, the "parents" option is used for Nagios
> itself (prehaps better re-worded as "internally") to define the network
> topology for the core host check. If the switch is down, it won't mar
Andrew Davis wrote:
> The bulk of my systems are behind one of three switches. I just went
> through my hosts.cfg file and added the "parents" line and appropriate
> switch name for each, but the host dependencies aren't showing up. I do
> use a host template for most of the servers and then other
Double-checking the docs I think I just realized this...
If I understand this right, the "parents" option is used for Nagios
itself (prehaps better re-worded as "internally") to define the network
topology for the core host check. If the switch is down, it won't mark a
host as Down, only as Un
On Jun 1, 2009, at 1:46 PM, Andrew Davis wrote:
> The bulk of my systems are behind one of three switches. I just went
> through my hosts.cfg file and added the "parents" line and
> appropriate switch name for each, but the host dependencies aren't
> showing up.
Parents and host dependenci
The bulk of my systems are behind one of three switches. I just went
through my hosts.cfg file and added the "parents" line and appropriate
switch name for each, but the host dependencies aren't showing up. I do
use a host template for most of the servers and then other specifics.
Below is a sa
On Mar 9, 2009, at 7:51 AM, Eduardo Barreto wrote:
> Jim,
>
> I already have configured the parent relationship, and for
> visualization (status map), the network structure is exactly what it
> is. I do now that the host dependency works for notify exactly where
> the problem is, that's the
Jim,
I already have configured the parent relationship, and for visualization
(status map), the network structure is exactly what it is. I do now that the
host dependency works for notify exactly where the problem is, that's the
reason, I send the last message to get some help on how to set it.
I
2009/3/8 Eduardo Barreto :
> I need an explain on how to exactly set the hosts dependencies, If I got a
> server linked to switch and that switch linked to a router, do I have to set
> the server to be a host dependent of the router or just for the switch?
>
> If the switch fails nagios won´t alert
I need an explain on how to exactly set the hosts dependencies, If I got a
server linked to switch and that switch linked to a router, do I have to set
the server to be a host dependent of the router or just for the switch?
If the switch fails nagios won´t alert me about the server but only for th
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nagios-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Jewett
> Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 11:21 AM
> To: Cook, Garry
> Cc: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Host Depen
> Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 9:25 AM
> To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Nagios-users] Host Dependencies
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm starting to monitor my Access Points with Nagios. The problem is
> they have "multiple" parents. Each AP is connected
To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Nagios-users] Host Dependencies
Hi,
I'm starting to monitor my Access Points with Nagios. The problem is
they have "multiple" parents. Each AP is connected to the parent
switch, which is simple, just a parent line in the APs host d
Hi,
I'm starting to monitor my Access Points with Nagios. The problem is
they have "multiple" parents. Each AP is connected to the parent
switch, which is simple, just a parent line in the APs host definition.
If the switch goes down I don't get alerted about the 15 APs behind.
The problem
Hi,
Andreaco wrote:
> ok tu use check_dummy for HOSTs or disable checks at all,
> the problem is that the host's colour remain green when unrecheable.
Well that is what I decided to live with. For my point view is service
PING and host check is duplicated. Personaly I think that you can say
that
Hi,
ok tu use check_dummy for HOSTs or disable checks at all,
the problem is that the host's colour remain green when unrecheable.
I find a workaroud for it.
I define host like this:
define host{
use generic-host
host_name linuxbox1
alias
Hi Andrea,
> Why any "check ping" services depend to the HOSTs STATUS?
> I need that "check ping" services send notifications in case HOST
> unrecheable.
> How can I break this dependency ?
any service depends on host it is running on. I disabled all hosts
checks it by defining check_command = ho
Why any "check ping" services depend to the HOSTs STATUS?
I need that "check ping" services send notifications in case HOST
unrecheable.
How can I break this dependency ?
Thanks,
Andrea
--
Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f
Sponsor:
Prestiti e Finanziamen
22 matches
Mail list logo
