Hi all,
I've found myself in a quandary and I'm wondering how other Nagios uses
have address similar problems.
We've recently upgraded to 2.6 and I've been tidying up the configs,
sorting out service groups, etc.
I've been adding checks for specific windows services, Exchange, Backup
Exec, vario
I'm also interested in this but haven't thought about how to actually go
about doing something like this. I have looked at the service
dependencies but the docs don't mention what you suggest so I would
expect that it doesn't work like this... yet.
unless anybody else has some more wisdom?
-h
ybody tried anything like this?
Thanks,
Todd
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hari
Sekhon
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 5:11 AM
To: Nagios Users mailinglist
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios Strategies
I'm also int
Hi,
Just my quick two cents - I've seen several times on our servers
(mostly on Windows 2000) that the SNMP service will be shown as running
even though the actual process has stopped responding. Then, we get a
flood of pages for all of our checks dependent on SNMP and have to
manually kil
This would be AWESOME(!!!) if it were easily implementable.
Cheers,
-Chris
Todd Mcneill wrote:
> It might also be interesting to see if there is a way to visually
> represent these service dependencies on the Status Map. I have people
> that are interested in viewing the status of the entire mu
I'm not sure on the ease, but it seems like it should be doable now
for any service/application for which you can run a Nagios check
against. The parent being the system (ping?), the next some base OS
subsystem, next the app that depends on it (log file checks or some
other homegrown verification),
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios Strategies
I'm not sure on the ease, but it seems like it should be doable now
for any service/application for which you can run a Nagios check
against. The parent being the system (ping?), the next some base OS
subsystem, next the app that depends on it (log
One of the things Tivoli had promised to provide our company was
end-to-end insight of our Java applications. It doesn't work. Any
product that does this is going to be difficult to create, implement
or administer. In our case, the easiest method for verifying the
uptime and performance of our appl
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Brian Loe" writes:
>One of the things Tivoli had promised to provide our company was
>end-to-end insight of our Java applications. It doesn't work. Any
>product that does this is going to be difficult to create, implement
>or administer. In our case, the easiest me
On 12/27/06, John P. Rouillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -- rouilj
> John Rouillard
Let me summarize my response to this excellent post: I'm working on
the same sort of thing, using SEC more so than Nagios - and not in
nearly as advanced a way as you are. I hav
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Brian Loe" writes:
>On 12/27/06, John P. Rouillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Let me summarize my response to this excellent post: I'm working on
>the same sort of thing, using SEC more so than Nagios -
The rule engine I was talking about is the integration of SE
AIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 22 December 2006 11:05 AM
To: Matthew Joyce
Cc: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios Strategies
Hi,
Just my quick two cents - I've seen several times on our servers
(mostly on Windows 2000) that the SNMP service will be shown a
12 matches
Mail list logo
