just print a string in perf data format, i.e. pipe character , then
label=value;
e.g.
OK this is fine | metric1=value1;
for a more detailed reference:
http://nagiosplug.sourceforge.net/developer-guidelines.html#AEN201
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
Hello,
I have a custom written bash script for checking my websites and trawling
around them.
Now I need to learn and understand now to get performance data into nagios from
this script so I can graph with PNP4Nagios
Can anybody give me any pointers on how to get performance output from this
You keep putting commas in your example output, but as someone else
already pointed out, perfdata is *space*-separated. The commas shouldn't
be there. It seems this probably isn't the issue though. Why don't you
post your plugin's source code so I can get a better idea of what's
going on.
Alex
The newlines were introduced by my mail client. There are no unusual
characters in the output of the plugin. As far as I can tell, the
perfdata complies completely with the specs.
status | key1=value1%;warn;crit, key2=value2%;warn;crit
The perfdata string is generated in a loop by appending an
Are the newlines in your output an artifact of sending this over email
or are there really newlines in your plugin output? If they're really
there, you should eliminate them.
Alex Griffin
---
Tech Team
agrif...@nagios.com
Jonathan Gazeley wrote:
> On 10/05/12 16:39, C. Bensend wrote:
>>
>>> I'v
On 05/10/2012 06:04 PM, Jonathan Gazeley wrote:
> On 10/05/12 16:39, C. Bensend wrote:
>>
>>> I've narrowed it down to a stage where running the plugin directly
>>> returns the right results, but running the plugin through check_nrpe on
>>> localhost returns this:
>>>
>>> [jg4461@dhcp1 log]$ /usr/l
On 10/05/12 16:39, C. Bensend wrote:
>
>> I've narrowed it down to a stage where running the plugin directly
>> returns the right results, but running the plugin through check_nrpe on
>> localhost returns this:
>>
>> [jg4461@dhcp1 log]$ /usr/lib64/nagios/plugins/check_nrpe -H localhost -c
>> check_
> I've narrowed it down to a stage where running the plugin directly
> returns the right results, but running the plugin through check_nrpe on
> localhost returns this:
>
> [jg4461@dhcp1 log]$ /usr/lib64/nagios/plugins/check_nrpe -H localhost -c
> check_dhcpd_pools
> OK - all pools less than 80% f
On 10/05/12 15:06, Mike Guthrie wrote:
> On 5/10/2012 5:51 AM, Jonathan Gazeley wrote:
>> On 10/05/12 11:31, C. Bensend wrote:
The plugin is being executed through NRPE. Executing the plugin by hand
seems to return valid perfdata:
[jg4461@dhcp1 ~]$ /usr/lib64/nagios/plugins/chec
On 5/10/2012 5:51 AM, Jonathan Gazeley wrote:
> On 10/05/12 11:31, C. Bensend wrote:
>>> The plugin is being executed through NRPE. Executing the plugin by hand
>>> seems to return valid perfdata:
>>>
>>> [jg4461@dhcp1 ~]$ /usr/lib64/nagios/plugins/check_dhcpd_pools
>>> OK - all pools less than 80%
On 10/05/12 11:31, C. Bensend wrote:
>
>> The plugin is being executed through NRPE. Executing the plugin by hand
>> seems to return valid perfdata:
>>
>> [jg4461@dhcp1 ~]$ /usr/lib64/nagios/plugins/check_dhcpd_pools
>> OK - all pools less than 80% full | 'resnet-wireless-652'=43.769%;80;90,
>> 're
> The plugin is being executed through NRPE. Executing the plugin by hand
> seems to return valid perfdata:
>
> [jg4461@dhcp1 ~]$ /usr/lib64/nagios/plugins/check_dhcpd_pools
> OK - all pools less than 80% full | 'resnet-wireless-652'=43.769%;80;90,
> 'resnet-wireless-653'=47.923%;80;90,
> 'resnet-
Some time ago I set up a bunch of Nagios checks including graphing of
performance data for various services. It all worked fine. I've just had
cause to look at the graphs and I noticed that performance data stopped
being logged a few weeks ago.
Nagios no longer seems to read in the performance
Thanks Ranjib and Claudio,
I am indeed seeing performance data from my NSCA clients :).
I am attempting to setup nagios2cacti and had some issues with that
config and then I started having doubts about the more basic bits as
per my questions to the list.
Im still struggling with nagios2cac
The performance data can be found in the output of the plugin, if the
plugin supports it.
There are two types of output actually.
The first part before the pipe is handled as "output", this will be shown
in your Nagios UI and in notifications.
The second part behind the pipe is handled as "performa
hi andy ,
passive check submissions via nsca can include perf data, theres no
restriction on that.
Though most of the plugins supports perf data, some of them dont. The
example you have mentioned, do return perf data.
/usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_ping -H 8.8.8.8 -w 15,2% -c 20,5%
PING OK - Packet
Hi,
I'd like to be able to log performance data from Nagios but I have
a couple of doubts.
First and most fundamental, will I be able to use the normal Nagios
perfdata support with passive NSCA clients?
Secondly, I have been reading the documentation, ie
http://nagios.manubulon.com/trad
Hey folks,
So, I have the following setup after some re-architecting this past
weekend:
* Primary Nagios server running 3.2.3
* Secondary Nagios server running 3.3.1, receiving all check results
via NSCA
Everything should be identical between the primary and secondary
servers, other tha
Ok , I finally figured it out. The real issue was with my command
definition in the commands.cfg file. It was defined such that it
executed the commnad without enabling the performance option. Now i am
getting the graphs for bandwidth usage.
Thanks everybody for providing clues and directions.
Two things:
1. I dont have a directory named as perfdata in the path :
/usr/local/nagios/share/perfdata
I have this directory in the following path :
/usr/local/pnp4nagios/var/perfdata , This directory usually has the
.rrd and the .xml files.
Currently for the service tha
There is a default template available in the templates.dist directory.
Is this the one that you are talking about ?
Thanks
Jatin
On 3/30/2010 5:28 PM, Giorgio Zarrelli wrote:
Probably there arr no default templare to graph the values gathered by
that control.
Ciao,
Giorgio
Il giorno 30/mar
On 30 March 2010 12:36, Jatin Davey wrote:
> I am getting the following error:
>
> application/models/data.php [217]:
> The XML file not found.
I would check under /usr/local/nagios/share/perfdata/ in the directory
for the host in question and maybe delete the .rrd and .xml file and
let PNP recr
Probably there arr no default templare to graph the values gathered by
that control.
Ciao,
Giorgio
Il giorno 30/mar/2010, alle ore 13.36, Jatin Davey
ha scritto:
I am getting the following error:
application/models/data.php [217]:
The XML file not found.
Thanks
Jatin
On 3/30/2010 4:5
On 30 March 2010 12:28, Jatin Davey wrote:
> Hi
>
> I used the plugin check_snmp_int from the following site:
>
> http://nagios.manubulon.com/snmp_int.html
>
> The following command was executed on the nagios server:
>
> [r...@pc-fedora-1 libexec]# ./check_snmp_int -H x.x.x.x -C -n eth0
> -r
I am getting the following error:
application/models/data.php *[217]:
The XML file not found.
Thanks
Jatin*
On 3/30/2010 4:58 PM, Jatin Davey wrote:
Hi
I used the plugin check_snmp_int from the following site:
http://nagios.manubulon.com/snmp_int.html
The following command was executed on t
Hi
I used the plugin check_snmp_int from the following site:
http://nagios.manubulon.com/snmp_int.html
The following command was executed on the nagios server:
[r...@pc-fedora-1 libexec]# ./check_snmp_int -H x.x.x.x -C -n eth0
-r -fY -k -w 1000,1000 -c 1100,1100 -d 40
eth0:UP (7.5KBps/13
well, SNMP is a proper Nagios client.
With rocommunity and firewall rules, security isn't a big deal.
I'm using SNMP to actively issue checks when passive transport get stalled.
It tries to send the passive result, expecting good return code from
send_nsca (and could check for cron, try to determ
Hi,
If you just want to check if a host is alive, icmp is the protocol
that's always been used for this purpose.
I use snmp mostly for appliances, eg. Routers, firewall and switches,
wherr I can't install a proper Nagios client to rely on.
Ciao,
Giorgio
Il giorno 15/mar/2010, alle ore 23.0
Snmp can be secured using version 3 feautures and narrowing down the
ip range allowed to place an snmp poll.
Ciao,
Giorgio
Il giorno 15/mar/2010, alle ore 23.32, Jim Avery
ha scritto:
> On 15 March 2010 22:02, Eduardo Barreto wrote:
>> Hi All, Could anybody tell me what's better, checking
On 15 March 2010 22:02, Eduardo Barreto wrote:
> Hi All, Could anybody tell me what's better, checking hosts through icmp
> protocol or snmp? What are the risks or may set the network at all on a poor
> status?
In Nagios, you should check a host using ICMP (the Nagios host check
is only to see if
Hi All, Could anybody tell me what's better, checking hosts through icmp
protocol or snmp? What are the risks or may set the network at all on a poor
status?
Cheers
Eduardo Barreto
--
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Hello list,
I am having an issue trying to run...
./check_nt -H van-sql01 -p * -s * -v COUNTER -l
"\\SQLServer:Databases(DWH)\Log File(s) Size (KB)","Log file for DWH is: %.2f
Kb"
I get:
Log file for DWH is: 143352.00 Kb | 'Log file for DWH is: %.2f
Kb'=143352.00%;0.00;0.
Hi all
I have recently enabled process_performance_data in nagios.cfg and in
the templates and setup pnp. this seems to work, but nagios doesn't
seem to start loggin performance data until I force a check.
Restarting it doesn't help much. Is this intentional? I have 100+
hosts in nagios, a
Z P wrote:
> Hi
>
> Why performance data is not send by send_nsca
> I got several monitored machines and they are sending check results to
> master server,
> problem is that they are not sending performance data, on local machines
> everything looks ok
> Any ideas???
>
You've specified a bad ocs
Hi
Why performance data is not send by send_nsca
I got several monitored machines and they are sending check results to
master server,
problem is that they are not sending performance data, on local machines
everything looks ok
Any ideas???
--
Regards
zbipol
-
And yet again, I answer my own questions. Sorry for clogging up the list. I
have to supply the -f switch and all is well, it's dumps the performance
output as expected.
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Stephen Valdinger <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey list,
>
> I'm having a time with check_
I'm sorry, I meant the check_snmp_storage.pl plugin from the aforementioned
site. The check_snmp_win plugin does not in fact write performance data.
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Stephen Valdinger <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey list,
>
> I'm having a time with check_snmp_win.pl from
> h
Hey list,
I'm having a time with check_snmp_win.pl from
http://nagios.manubulon.com/snmp_windows.html. I'm running Nagios 2.10 with
1.4.11 plugins. I just recently go PNP up and running, and I must say I am
rather pleased with the results thus far. What I am wanting to do is graph
the performa
On Jun 5, 2008, at 9:11 AM, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 08:01:12AM -0500, Marc Powell wrote:
>> Until last year I was using Compaq DL360's (dual P3 1.4Ghz, 1G ram)
>> to
>> monitor 800+ services at 5 minute intervals + Cricket data collection
>> for 10's of thousands of int
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 08:01:12AM -0500, Marc Powell wrote:
> Until last year I was using Compaq DL360's (dual P3 1.4Ghz, 1G ram) to
> monitor 800+ services at 5 minute intervals + Cricket data collection
> for 10's of thousands of interfaces during that same interval.
You're talking, there,
On Jun 5, 2008, at 4:57 AM, Nicole Hähnel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running nagios 3.0.2 on a dell poweredge 2850 server with 2gb ram
> and a xeon 2.80GHz cpu.
> Also running on this server, ndo utils 1.47b, pnp, nagvis and
> nagiosla.(os is newest rhel5)
> Nagios checks 113 hosts and 660 services, mo
Hi,
I'm running nagios 3.0.2 on a dell poweredge 2850 server with 2gb ram
and a xeon 2.80GHz cpu.
Also running on this server, ndo utils 1.47b, pnp, nagvis and
nagiosla.(os is newest rhel5)
Nagios checks 113 hosts and 660 services, most of them every 3 minutes.
Server load is over 1.3 most of th
d SHOWALL option and that
> didn't work. Any ideas?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Izz
>
> -Original Message-
> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Tue, 20 May 2008 22:00:12 -0400
> *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Subject:* Re: [Nagios-users] Performance data for servi
OTECTED]Sent: Tue, 20 May 2008 22:00:12 -0400To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Performance data for serviceYou should be able to get this data through the Process performance counter object with the instance set to the process name (as long as you can map the process name to an actua
Memory usage of a process.
>
> Thanks,
> Izz
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tue, 20 May 2008 10:49:48 +0200
> > To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Performance data for service
>
nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Performance data for service
>
> Hi Izz,
>
> Izz Abdullah schrieb:
>> I have enabled performance data for my monitored Windows 2k3 server. I
>> am receiving performance data, not extremely clear, but receiving, for
>&g
Hi Izz,
Izz Abdullah schrieb:
> I have enabled performance data for my monitored Windows 2k3 server. I am
> receiving performance data, not extremely clear, but receiving, for the
> defaulted services. What I want is to see performance data on running
> processes as well (e.g. the Explorer.ex
I have enabled performance data for my monitored Windows 2k3 server. I am
receiving performance data, not extremely clear, but receiving, for the
defaulted services. What I want is to see performance data on running
processes as well (e.g. the Explorer.exe process has nothing in the performanc
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
>Of Oliver Hookins
>Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 11:57 PM
>To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Performance tuning a host
>returning resultsv
On Fri Mar 07, 2008 at 15:56:51 +1100, Oliver Hookins wrote:
>On Thu Mar 06, 2008 at 22:39:41 -0600, Marc Powell wrote:
>>
>>On Mar 6, 2008, at 8:17 PM, Oliver Hookins wrote:
>
>>I'd also check communication between the remote and central. Try
>>sending passive results manually from the command l
On Thu Mar 06, 2008 at 22:39:41 -0600, Marc Powell wrote:
>
>On Mar 6, 2008, at 8:17 PM, Oliver Hookins wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I guess performance is a constant problem for everyone but what I'm
>> seeing
>> doesn't seem to make sense. I have two servers running Nagios, one
>> that is
>> mor
On Mar 6, 2008, at 8:17 PM, Oliver Hookins wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I guess performance is a constant problem for everyone but what I'm
> seeing
> doesn't seem to make sense. I have two servers running Nagios, one
> that is
> more or less just a frontend and another doing the checks and
> retur
On Mar 6, 2008, at 8:17 PM, Oliver Hookins wrote:
>
> I'm interested to see anyone else's performance values on a system
> where
> they are using send_nsca.
I have 5 remote nagios systems sending passive results to 2 central
machines every 5 minutes. ~90% of my checks are check_icmp. I'm us
Hi all,
I guess performance is a constant problem for everyone but what I'm seeing
doesn't seem to make sense. I have two servers running Nagios, one that is
more or less just a frontend and another doing the checks and returning
results via send_nsca. Constantly I see the frontend light up with c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nathan Blackham wrote:
> I am wondering if anyone has done a performance comparison of NRPE vs.
> SNMP for simple things like CPU load and Disk Space? I want to know
> the performance impact for the machine being monitored.
Hi, Nathan.
- From the
Quick Question.
I am wondering if anyone has done a performance comparison of NRPE vs.
SNMP for simple things like CPU load and Disk Space? I want to know
the performance impact for the machine being monitored.
Thanks
Nathan
-
Hi!
On Tue, 02 Jan 2007, Daniel Meyer wrote:
> Program Running Time: 10d 21h 22m 42s
>
> So, for almost eleven days nagios runs smoothly now, no more
> latency problems. I'll try it again with EPN (but still without
> perlcache) now.
I've finally gotten around to recompile Nagio
Robert Hajime Lanning wrote:
>
>> Just rechecked. After 72 hours nagios still runs perfectly
>> with an average service check latency of 0.3 seconds, max.
>> 0.9 seconds.
>>
>> Memory usage is perfectly "flat" now, with epn and perlcache
>> it went from 140 mb (whole system) to about 900 mb within
Robert Hajime Lanning wrote:
> I have also been having performance issues with Nagios 2.5 on
> a Sun E220R with two 400MHz procs and 1GB ram.
>
> Sys stats are at http://lanning.cc/kipper.html
>
> The large dips in load and system CPU time are when I restart
> Nagios. (cron'd twice a week, but I
> Context is massive memory leak with ePN. Leak goes when ePN is
> removed.
I have a feeling it is more with the way plugin caching works.
> There should be added another major caveat to this: depending on
> your plugins you may have a bigger or smaller leak, however leak
> it will.
I have gone
Dear Sir,
I am writing to thank you for your letter and say,
> -Original Message-
> --
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 08:26:34 +0100 (CET)
> From: Daniel Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Performanc
Hi there, and happy new year :-)
Program Running Time: 10d 21h 22m 42s
So, for almost eleven days nagios runs smoothly now, no more latency
problems. I'll try it again with EPN (but still without perlcache) now.
Danny
--
Q: Gentoo is too hard to install =http://www
> On Mon, 25 Dec 2006, Robert Hajime Lanning wrote:
>> I have a few that use the output of the last check to see
>> differences in accumulators and the like. And I see that
>> the caching code caches a parsed version of the arguments.
>> This caching has no expirations just appending the new
>>
Hi!
On Mon, 25 Dec 2006, Robert Hajime Lanning wrote:
> > I think the two issues are independent (or at most correlated).
> > If switching off EPN/perlcache fixes the issues for me, too, I'd
> > guess it's either the embedded Perl or the cache. Finding out
> > which is a matter of simple experime
> I'm not using a single SNMP check, and I have the very same
> problem: so I'd say no.
Ok, seperate issues... :)
> I think the two issues are independent (or at most correlated).
> If switching off EPN/perlcache fixes the issues for me, too, I'd
> guess it's either the embedded Perl or the cac
Hi!
On Mon, 25 Dec 2006, Robert Hajime Lanning wrote:
>
>
> > Just rechecked. After 72 hours nagios still runs perfectly
> > with an average service check latency of 0.3 seconds, max.
> > 0.9 seconds.
> >
> > Memory usage is perfectly "flat" now, with epn and perlcache
> > it went from 140 mb
> Just rechecked. After 72 hours nagios still runs perfectly
> with an average service check latency of 0.3 seconds, max.
> 0.9 seconds.
>
> Memory usage is perfectly "flat" now, with epn and perlcache
> it went from 140 mb (whole system) to about 900 mb within 24h.
>
> The average system load is
On Sun, 24 Dec 2006, Joerg Linge wrote:
>> I have watched over the last hour the process grow from 124M
>> to 126M.
>>
>> I use ePN with caching. Most of my checks are SNMP requests
>> via ePN scripts (http://lanning.cc/custom_plugins/), with
>> p1.pl modified with:
>>
>> use SNMP 5.0;
>> SNM
Am Sonntag, 24. Dezember 2006 11:35 schrieb Robert Hajime Lanning:
> I have also been having performance issues with Nagios 2.5 on
> a Sun E220R with two 400MHz procs and 1GB ram.
[...]
> I have noticed the Nagios seems to have a memory leak. As,
> I have watched over the last hour the process gr
I have also been having performance issues with Nagios 2.5 on
a Sun E220R with two 400MHz procs and 1GB ram.
Sys stats are at http://lanning.cc/kipper.html
The large dips in load and system CPU time are when I restart
Nagios. (cron'd twice a week, but I have also been making
a lot of service upd
Hi!
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Daniel Meyer wrote:
> > I have the suspicion that our check latency might converge on 419
> > seconds - but I'd rather not test it, we'd be well beyond the
> > 300s-interval most of our checks are designed for.
>
> Why do you think of exactly 419 seconds?
>
> And btw, i
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> I have the suspicion that our check latency might converge on 419
> seconds - but I'd rather not test it, we'd be well beyond the
> 300s-interval most of our checks are designed for.
Why do you think of exactly 419 seconds?
And btw, if our problems
Hi!
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
> >>> SERVICE SCHEDULING INFORMATION
> >>> ---
> >>> Total services: 2836
> >>> Total scheduled services: 2836
> >>> Service inter-check delay method: SMART
> >>> Average service check int
Hi!
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Daniel Meyer wrote:
> - it is not triggered by any other software on the server
>(nagios and apache are the only things running there)
ACK.
> - its not triggered by hourly, daily or weekly cronjobs
With a lot of guessing and estimating, I can make a case for a
slig
Ok,
this is what i noticed on my performance issues during the last days:
- it is not triggered by any other software on the server
(nagios and apache are the only things running there)
- its not triggered by hourly, daily or weekly cronjobs
- the big service check latency goes away instantl
Hi!
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
> >>> ---
> >>> Total services: 2836
> >>> Total scheduled services: 2836
> >>> Service inter-check delay method: SMART
> >>> Average service check interval: 2225.56 sec
> >> This is,
Hi!
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Daniel Meyer wrote:
> >> You could lower this to 2 seconds. I've done so on any number of
> >> installations and it has no negative impact what so ever, but seems to
> >> make Nagios a bit more responsive.
> >
> > I'll give that a try.
>
> I've tried that but had some fa
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> I'm running 2.6 now but I had the troubles with 2.5 initially.
> OS is a Gentoo Linux, Kernel 2.6.15.5 initially, upgrade to
> 2.6.19 today.
Same here. Latency-Problems with both 2.5 and 2.6, but on CentOS 4.4 (good
that you use gentoo, saves me the
Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
>> Thanks for an excellently detailed problem report, missing only the
>> Nagios version and system type/version info. I've got some comments and
>> followup questions. See below.
>
> I'm running 2.6 now but I had t
Hi!
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
> Thanks for an excellently detailed problem report, missing only the
> Nagios version and system type/version info. I've got some comments and
> followup questions. See below.
I'm running 2.6 now but I had the troubles with 2.5 initially.
OS is
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
> Are the CPU's 64 bit ones running in 32-bit emulation mode? For intel
> cpu's, that causes up to 60% performance loss (yes, it really is that bad).
I just can answer for my setup (which is almost identical except for i
have "only" 1700 service check
Thanks for an excellently detailed problem report, missing only the
Nagios version and system type/version info. I've got some comments and
followup questions. See below.
Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Recently I have run into the very same performance issues
> as Daniel Meyer (or so it se
Hi!
Recently I have run into the very same performance issues
as Daniel Meyer (or so it seems). However, I'm not quite sure
about it. Here's the gist of it.
Currently, service check latency slowly creeps up. As it is now,
it starts out at a little over 1s and after about 12 hours it's
in the ar
Hello,
I am running nagios-2.3.1 (rpm from DAG repository) on enterprise Redhat
Enterprise Linux 2.4.
Nagios has been configured to write out performance data to a file. The
configuration works but sometime later, (I think when Nagios archives
nagios.log), the performance data file is truncate
On 7 Jul 2006, at 14:42, Chet Luther wrote:On 7/7/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I would like to know how to Improve Nagios 2.4 Performance. We monitor586 Host & 2326 Services thru Nagios with Active & Passive configurationusing Solaris OS & good Hardware & Network config( So
On 7/7/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to know how to Improve Nagios 2.4 Performance. We monitor
> 586 Host & 2326 Services thru Nagios with Active & Passive configuration
> using Solaris OS & good Hardware & Network config( Solaris 9 -- Active,
> Solaris 10- Pa
Title: Performance Problem on Nagios 2.4
Dear All,
I would like to know how to Improve Nagios 2.4 Performance. We monitor 586 Host & 2326 Services thru Nagios with Active & Passive configuration using Solaris OS & good Hardware & Network config( Solaris 9 -- Active, Solaris 10- Passive
Hi All,This is a resend of a mail, that appears not to have made it to the list.I am have recently upgraded my
nagios from 1.3 to 2.2, and am having trouble with nagiosgraph's
insert.pl ever since. If I set up my process-service-perfdata command
like so:define command{ command_name proce
ility for loss or damage, howsoever caused.
***
From: Terry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 April 2006 19:17
To: Deborah Martin
Cc: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Performance data in web interfa
Hi Deborah,
you just need to execute Plugins with performance data in their output.
AFAIK most of the Plugins out of the actual package (version 1.4.2 I
think) are dealing with perfdata.
Deborah Martin schrieb:
Hi,
I'm using Nagios 2.0 on Suse 9.3 which runs without any issues.
However,
In this case, that won't help. that just tells Nagios whether or not to
process perf data it receives from the plugins.
Not all plugins provide performance data, and it sounds like that's the
case here.
On Thu, 06 Apr 2006, Terry wrote:
> process_performance_data=1 in nagios.cfg?
>
> On 4/6/06
process_performance_data=1 in nagios.cfg?
On 4/6/06, Deborah Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using Nagios 2.0 on Suse 9.3 which runs without any issues.
>
> However, one thing i've been meaning to find out is why on the web
> interface, when you select a service check to view, the
Hi,
I'm using Nagios 2.0 on Suse 9.3 which runs without any issues.
However, one thing i've been meaning to find out is why on the web
interface, when you select a service check to view, the 'Performance Data'
field is empty under the 'Service State information'.
What do I need to configure
Mike Koponick wrote:
> Florian,
>
> I understand that perfparse stores it in a database, but I really don't
> want to maintain two databases, and/or yet another set of tables. It
> seems to me that you should be able to get performance data into the NDO
> tables and calculate from there.
>
> Mike
AM
To: Mike Koponick
Cc: Nagios Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] performance data reporting
Mike Koponick wrote:
> Florian,
>
> I understand that perfparse stores it in a database, but I really
don't
> want to maintain two databases, and/or yet another set of tabl
ED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 7:13 AM
> To: Mike Koponick
> Cc: Nagios Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] performance data reporting
>
> Mike Koponick wrote:
>
>>Florian,
>>
>>I understand that perfparse stores it in a database, but I rea
From: Florian Gleixner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 7:51 AM
To: Mike Koponick
Cc: Nagios Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] performance data reporting
Mike Koponick wrote:
> Terry,
>
> I know for me, I would like to see something like an output of MR
Mike Koponick wrote:
> Terry,
>
> I know for me, I would like to see something like an output of MRTG. I
> know I can integrate MRTG in some forms, but I would like to pull
> directly from the MySQL tables/columns, rather than using something like
> RRDTool, as I can get a better (longer) history
in many places.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 11:58 AM
To: Nagios Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] performance data reporting
moshe sharon wrote:
> Hello
>
> i can recomme
moshe sharon wrote:
Hello
i can recommend excellent tool called nagiosgraph. its pretty simple
to setup. and it can be expanded to to mysql logging.
url: http://sourceforge.net/projects/nagiosgraph/
Hope it Helped
Moshe Sharon
Graphs are pretty good but what other formats are people looking f
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
