-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24/01/08 05:13 PM, Frost, Mark {PBG} wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Thomas Guyot-Sionnest [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> I don't know how many people use OCP_Daemon but I had reports
>from a few
>>> people that greatly re
-Original Message-
>> From: Thomas Guyot-Sionnest [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 3:33 AM
>> To: Frost, Mark {PBG}
>> Cc: Nagios Users
>> Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Problem with high latencies after
>> going distributed
>>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Thomas Guyot-Sionnest [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 3:33 AM
>To: Frost, Mark {PBG}
>Cc: Nagios Users
>Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Problem with high latencies after
>going distributed
>
>-BEGIN PG
Thomas Guyot-Sionnest [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 10:24 PM
>> To: Frost, Mark {PBG}
>> Cc: Nagios Users
>> Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Problem with high latencies after
>> going distributed
> I don't think so. I remember an email fro
>-Original Message-
>From: Thomas Guyot-Sionnest [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 10:24 PM
>To: Frost, Mark {PBG}
>Cc: Nagios Users
>Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Problem with high latencies after
>going distributed
>
>-BEGIN PG
> Cc: Nagios Users
>> Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Problem with high latencies after
>> going distributed
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 22/01/08 09:13 PM, Frost, Mark {PBG} wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> -
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nagios-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frost, Mark {PBG}
> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 10:34 AM
> To: Nagios Users
> Subject: [Nagios-users] Problem with high latencies after going
> distribu
>-Original Message-
>From: Thomas Guyot-Sionnest [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 10:29 PM
>To: Frost, Mark {PBG}
>Cc: Nagios Users
>Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Problem with high latencies after
>going distributed
>
>-BEGIN PG
>> Subject: RE: [Nagios-users] Problem with high latencies after
>> going distributed
>>
>> We've just done exactly the same (Nagios 2.9), and we have a comparable
>> size of system (actually a bit larger - 713 hosts, 5834 services).
>> After going distributed,
> >>Active Service Latency: 0.000 / 7267.198 /
...
> >The only possible cause is the OCSP command slowing things
> >down somehow.
...
> But if the submit_check_result is running slowly, that would only
affect
> the service
> execution time wouldn't it? My understanding of check l
>-Original Message-
>From: Steve Shipway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 8:45 PM
>To: Frost, Mark {PBG}; Nagios Users
>Subject: RE: [Nagios-users] Problem with high latencies after
>going distributed
>
>> As I'd mentioned i
> As I'd mentioned in a previous message, I'm in the process of
converting
> from a centralized
> Nagios 2.10 setup all running on a single host to a distributed setup
> running on at least 3
> hosts (3 to start anyway). The centralized setup has 572 hosts and
2900
> services 99.9% of which are ac
As I'd mentioned in a previous message, I'm in the process of converting
from a centralized
Nagios 2.10 setup all running on a single host to a distributed setup
running on at least 3
hosts (3 to start anyway). The centralized setup has 572 hosts and 2900
services 99.9% of which are active check
13 matches
Mail list logo
