> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nagios-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas K. Rand
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 3:16 PM
> To: Kyle Sexton
> Cc: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Problems with FreeBSD
Doug> The following entry in /etc/libmap.conf has, for us, solved the issue
Doug> of run away Nagios processes.
Doug> [nagios]
Doug> libpthread.so.2 libthr.so.2
Doug> libpthread.so libthr.so
Doug> This is on FreeBSD 6.2.
Kyle> Was there a recompile or anything necessary?
No. You do have to st
On 19 Jun 2007 13:37:15 -0500, Douglas K. Rand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Michael> Skimming the (long) discussion thread, my first thought is to
Michael> try libthr instead of libkse. The discussion seems to be on
Michael> 5.x, I'd definitely try libthr on 6.x. Check libmap.conf for
Michael> d
Michael> Skimming the (long) discussion thread, my first thought is to
Michael> try libthr instead of libkse. The discussion seems to be on
Michael> 5.x, I'd definitely try libthr on 6.x. Check libmap.conf for
Michael> details.
The following entry in /etc/libmap.conf has, for us, solved the issu
On 6/19/07, Jonathan Call <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No.
I was forced to implement a distributed model and limit the service
checks to less than 1000 on a server. Even then I still have to run a
cron job that checks for nagios children than are spinning on the CPU as
a result of this fork issue
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nagios-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael W. Lucas
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 5:16 AM
> To: Kyle Sexton
> Cc: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Problems with FreeB
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 06:42:18PM -0500, Kyle Sexton wrote:
> On 12/14/06, Andreas Ericsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jonathan Call wrote:
> > >
> > > Given your ideas and some google work I seem to have found my problem:
> > >
> > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2005-Aug
On 12/14/06, Andreas Ericsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jonathan Call wrote:
> >
> > Given your ideas and some google work I seem to have found my problem:
> >
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2005-August/013247.ht
> > ml
> >
> > Not a pretty discussion. :(
> >
>
> Nope. De
Jonathan Call wrote:
>
> Given your ideas and some google work I seem to have found my problem:
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2005-August/013247.ht
> ml
>
> Not a pretty discussion. :(
>
Nope. Definitely not.
The problem for Nagios is that threading was added after t
onder
why they even bother maintaining it in ports?)
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Ericsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 2:26 AM
> To: Jonathan Call
> Cc: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Problems with FreeBSD and Na
Jonathan Call wrote:
> I scanned the mailing list trying to find a solution for this. I found a
> brief discussion where someone had the same problem but there was
> nothing really discussed what was potentially wrong.
>
> My system:
> Dual 2.8GHz P4 processors
> 4GB of RAM
> FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-
I scanned the mailing list trying to find a solution for this. I found a
brief discussion where someone had the same problem but there was
nothing really discussed what was potentially wrong.
My system:
Dual 2.8GHz P4 processors
4GB of RAM
FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p10
Running processes:
Nagios 2.6 (i
12 matches
Mail list logo
