On 04/10/2012 09:24 AM, Marco Borsani wrote:
> Very interesting.
>
> I don't understand french a lot are there the steps to follow for the
> optimization ?
>
Here they are:
1. Set "use_large_installation_tweaks=1" in your nagios.cfg
2. restart nagios.
Not exactly rocket science.
--
Andrea
I've just turned on this use_large_installation_tweaks option today. It
reduces the check latency significantly. Other than that, not so much.
I had tried using mod_gearman as well. It's a very nice addition to
distribute loads to other servers, but I had a hard time doing
configuration, deciding
Very interesting.
I don't understand french a lot are there the steps to follow for the
optimization ?
Regards
Marco
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Alexandre Bray [mailto:in...@opendoc.net]
Inviato: sabato 7 aprile 2012 18:50
A: Nagios Users List
Oggetto: Re: [Nagios-users] use_large_ins
On 04/07/2012 05:57 PM, Esteban Monge wrote:
>
>>
>> Try out merlin instead of NSCA. It's far more efficient at passing checks
>> between servers than NSCA.
>>
>
> Hello Andreas.
>
> I have one server with NSCA, for accepting passive checks from 80 hosts
> more or less.
>
> The next step is rep
>
> Try out merlin instead of NSCA. It's far more efficient at passing checks
> between servers than NSCA.
>
Hello Andreas.
I have one server with NSCA, for accepting passive checks from 80 hosts
more or less.
The next step is replicate the same configuration in another server, for
example for
On 04/05/2012 04:20 PM, Marco Borsani wrote:
> I am testing it on 3 different nagios systems.
>
> It seems very good regarding latency, nothing change in execution_time.
>
It's not supposed to change anything in execution time. What happens in
the plugins is not for Nagios core to control, even
I am testing it on 3 different nagios systems.
It seems very good regarding latency, nothing change in execution_time.
I wonder if configuring " use_large_installation_tweaks=1" I can find
problems in other part of the monitoring...
Regards
-Messaggio originale-
Da: C. Bensend [mailto:
On 04/05/2012 10:18 AM, Marco Borsani wrote:
> We don't use NDOutils.
>
> We have two kind of performance problem:
> 1) day-by-day - some Nagios servers have many services configured that can
> be heavy for the HW
> 2) trouble with main Nagios server - the other Nagios servers that send to
> the m
We don't use NDOutils.
We have two kind of performance problem:
1) day-by-day - some Nagios servers have many services configured that can
be heavy for the HW
2) trouble with main Nagios server - the other Nagios servers that send to
the main the passive results (via nsca) , due to the stop of the
